Literature DB >> 20882341

An assessment of the potential of the microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA) for ecotoxicological testing.

Patricia Bi Fai1, Alastair Grant.   

Abstract

Rapid microscale toxicity tests make it possible to screen large numbers of compounds and greatly simplify toxicity identification evaluation and other effect directed chemical analyses of effluents or environmental samples. Tests using Vibrio fischeri (such as Microtox®) detect toxicants that cause non-specific narcosis, but are insensitive to other important classes of contaminants. The microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA) is a 24 h multi-species test that seeks to address this problem by using a battery of ten bacteria and a fungus. But there has been little independent evaluation of this test, and there is no published information on its sensitivity to pesticides. Here, we assess the performance of MARA using a range of toxicants including reference chemicals, fungicides and environmental samples. Mean MARA microbial toxic concentrations and IC(20)s (20% Inhibitory concentrations) indicate the toxicant concentrations affecting the more sensitive micro-organisms, while the mean IC(50) (50% Inhibitory concentration) was found to be the concentration that was toxic to most MARA species. For the two fungicides tested, the yeast (Pichia anomalia) was the most sensitive of the ten MARA species, and was more sensitive than the nine other yeasts tested. The test may be particularly valuable for work with fungicides. Mean MARA IC(50)s were comparable to values for nine other yeast species and the lowest individual IC(50)s for each toxicant were comparable to reported IC(50)s for Daphnia magna, Selenastrum capricornutum and Microtox® bioassays. MARA organisms exhibited more variable sensitivities, with the most sensitive organism being different for different samples, enhancing the likelihood of toxicity detection and giving a toxicity "fingerprint" that may help identify toxicants. The test, therefore, has great potential and would be valuable for ecotoxicological testing of pollutants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882341     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-010-0548-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  16 in total

1.  Ecotoxicological study of Lithuanian and Estonian wastewaters: selection of the biotests, and correspondence between toxicity and chemical-based indices.

Authors:  L Manusadzianas; L Balkelyte; K Sadauskas; I Blinova; L Põllumaa; A Kahru
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Toxicity of pesticides to aquatic microorganisms: a review.

Authors:  M E DeLorenzo; G I Scott; P E Ross
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 3.  [Modes of action of agrochemicals against plant pathogenic organisms].

Authors:  Pierre Leroux
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.583

Review 4.  Effect-directed analysis: a promising tool for the identification of organic toxicants in complex mixtures?

Authors:  Werner Brack
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Intra-laboratory evaluation of Microbial Assay for Risk Assessment (MARA) for potential application in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD).

Authors:  Kirit Wadhia; Terry Dando; K Clive Thompson
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2007-07-05

6.  ISTA13--international interlaboratory comparative evaluation of microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA).

Authors:  K Wadhia
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.119

7.  Yeasts as a model for assessing the toxicity of the fungicides Penconazol, Cymoxanil and Dichlofluanid.

Authors:  I C Ribeiro; I Veríssimo; L Moniz; H Cardoso; M J Sousa; A M Soares; C Leão
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  A comparative study of Saccharomyces cerevisiae sensitivity against eight yeast species sensitivities to a range of toxicants.

Authors:  Patricia Bi Fai; Alastair Grant
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Effects of a heterogeneous set of xenobiotics on growth and plasma membranes of mammalian and fungal cell cultures.

Authors:  I Cascorbi; H Bittrich; J Ricklinkat; W Voss; A Seyfarth; M Forêt
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.291

10.  A rapid resazurin bioassay for assessing the toxicity of fungicides.

Authors:  Patricia Bi Fai; Alastair Grant
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  7 in total

1.  Potential of the microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA) for assessing ecotoxicological effects of herbicides to non-target organisms.

Authors:  Patricia Bi Asanga Fai; Mpoame Mbida; Jean Marc Demefack; Cedric Yamssi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Evaluation of usefulness of Microbial Assay for Risk Assessment (MARA) in the cyanobacterial toxicity estimation.

Authors:  Anna Sieroslawska
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The ECOTOXicology Knowledgebase: A Curated Database of Ecologically Relevant Toxicity Tests to Support Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jennifer H Olker; Colleen M Elonen; Anne Pilli; Arne Anderson; Brian Kinziger; Stephen Erickson; Michael Skopinski; Anita Pomplun; Carlie A LaLone; Christine L Russom; Dale Hoff
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.218

4.  Application of Multi-Species Microbial Bioassay to Assess the Effects of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Aquatic Environment: Potential of a Luminous Microbial Array for Toxicity Risk Assessment (LumiMARA) on Testing for Surface-Coated Silver Nanoparticles.

Authors:  YounJung Jung; Chang-Beom Park; Youngjun Kim; Sanghun Kim; Stephan Pflugmacher; Seungyun Baik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Impact of an Engineered Copper-Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposite and Parent Substrates on the Bacteria Viability, Antioxidant Enzymes and Fatty Acid Profiling.

Authors:  Oliwia Metryka; Daniel Wasilkowski; Anna Nowak; Małgorzata Adamczyk-Habrajska; Agnieszka Mrozik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Assessment of Biodegradation Efficiency of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) in Soil Using Three Individual Bacterial Strains and Their Mixed Culture.

Authors:  Teresa Steliga; Katarzyna Wojtowicz; Piotr Kapusta; Joanna Brzeszcz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Assessment of the Suitability of Melilotus officinalis for Phytoremediation of Soil Contaminated with Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH and PAH), Zn, Pb and Cd Based on Toxicological Tests.

Authors:  Teresa Steliga; Dorota Kluk
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-06-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.