Literature DB >> 12615419

Ecotoxicological study of Lithuanian and Estonian wastewaters: selection of the biotests, and correspondence between toxicity and chemical-based indices.

L Manusadzianas1, L Balkelyte, K Sadauskas, I Blinova, L Põllumaa, A Kahru.   

Abstract

The toxicity of industrial and urban wastewater (WW) samples collected in Lithuania and Estonia was evaluated by using a suite of biological tests comprising the Algaltoxkit F with Selenastrum capricornutum, the Charatox with Nitellopsis obtusa, Daphtoxkit F with Daphnia magna, Thamnotoxkit F with Thamnocephalus platyurus, Protoxkit F with Tetrahymena thermophila and the Microtox with Vibrio fischeri. The Charatox and Thamnotoxkit F tests showed highest relative sensitivity, responding to 80-90% of samples, respectively, and both expressed good discrimination capacity between samples. Principal Component and pairwise correlation analysis allowed to select test-battery consisting of Charatox, Thamnotoxkit and Microtox. The WW toxicity was evaluated by means of cumulative indices such as average toxicity (AvTx) and two indices derived from the PEEP-index (Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 8 (1993) 115). In addition to these integrated evaluations of test-battery response, WW toxicity was evaluated according to the most sensitive test (MST) in the battery. The linear regression analysis between cumulative toxicity indices and chemical-based indices (derived from comparison of WW chemical concentrations and their respective maximum allowable concentration) revealed positive linear relationships (r(2)=0.7-0.8), while toxicity evaluation based on the MST was less positively related with chemical analysis data (r(2)=0.5-0.6). Although better coincidence between the toxicity and chemical-based assessments was achieved when information from all tests in the battery was assembled, the prediction of toxicity from chemical data was still limited. In search of suitable test-battery for the screening of certain type of WWs, a preliminary study comprising excessive suite of tests might be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12615419     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-445x(02)00132-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  8 in total

1.  Chlorination in a wastewater treatment plant: acute toxicity effects of the effluent and of the recipient water body.

Authors:  Cristina Pignata; Elisabetta Fea; Renato Rovere; Raffaella Degan; Eugenio Lorenzi; Margherita de Ceglia; Tiziana Schilirò; Giorgio Gilli
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The relationship between whole effluent toxicity (WET) and chemical-based effluent quality assessment in Vojvodina (Serbia).

Authors:  Ivana Teodorović; Milena Becelić; Ivana Planojević; Ivana Ivancev-Tumbas; Bozo Dalmacija
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Efficiency of a cleanup technology to remove mercury from natural waters by means of rice husk biowaste: ecotoxicological and chemical approach.

Authors:  Luciana S Rocha; I Lopes; Cláudia B Lopes; Bruno Henriques; Amadeu M V M Soares; Armando C Duarte; Eduarda Pereira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Evaluation of psychiatric hospital wastewater toxicity: what is its impact on aquatic organisms?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Mazzitelli; Hélène Budzinski; Jérôme Cachot; Olivier Geffard; Pierre Marty; Axelle Chiffre; Adeline François; Elsa Bonnafe; Florence Geret
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  An assessment of the potential of the microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA) for ecotoxicological testing.

Authors:  Patricia Bi Fai; Alastair Grant
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  LuxCDABE--transformed constitutively bioluminescent Escherichia coli for toxicity screening: comparison with naturally luminous Vibrio fischeri.

Authors:  Imbi Kurvet; Angela Ivask; Olesja Bondarenko; Mariliis Sihtmäe; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Comparison of Substance-Based and Whole-Effluent Toxicity of Produced Water Discharges from Norwegian Offshore Oil and Gas Installations.

Authors:  Pepijn de Vries; Robbert G Jak; Tone K Frost
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.218

8.  Application of a battery of biotests for the determination of leachate toxicity to bacteria and invertebrates from sewage sludge-amended soil.

Authors:  Anna Malara; Patryk Oleszczuk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.