Literature DB >> 20881517

Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone with bioactive cement augmentation using simulated in vivo multicomponent loading.

Theodore J Choma1, Wesley F Frevert, William L Carson, Nicole P Waters, Ferris M Pfeiffer.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Biomechanical analysis of bioactive cements augmenting pedicle screw resistance to loosening in osteoporotic synthetic bone.
OBJECTIVE: To simulate in vivo loading-loosening of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae; and to compare biomechanical efficacy of the following bioactive cements: calcium phosphate (CP), calcium sulfate (CS), and proprietary mixture (M). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw instrumentation in osteoporotic spines is limited by poor bone-screw interface strength, resulting in screw loosening fixation failure. Previous in vivo studies evaluated augmented pedicle screw resistance to pure pullout, not simulating in vivo loading/failure.
METHODS: A pedicle screw-instrumented osteoporotic thoracic vertebra subjected to combined pullout, transverse, moment loading was simulated. Unconstrained 3-dimensional screw motion relative to vertebra was optically measured during quasi-static, and dynamic loading.
RESULTS: Augmented groups (CP, CS, M) produced (P < 8.0E-07) higher quasi-static failure initiation force (61.2,45.6, 40.3 N) than those by the nonaugmented group (21.0 N), with no significant difference in small screw displacement up to these loads. Nonaugmented screw motion after failure initiation was primarily rotation (toggle-migration) with minimal pullout until the screw tip contacted the superior endplate, followed by more prominent screw pullout. Augmented screw motion (with cement remaining intact on screw) was similar, but with eventual bone fracture anterior to the pedicle region. Dynamic loading produced similar failure initiation force and screw motion.
CONCLUSION: We believe our test protocol produced screw loosening failure similar to that observed clinically, and that it has the ability to detect differences in failure initiation force and failure modes to compare short-term efficacy of screw augmentation techniques. All cements improved screw resistance to failure. The CP > CS > M failure initiation force (P < 0.006) was because of differences in cement distribution. Animal studies may be required to characterize the remodeling activity of bioactive cements and their longer term efficacies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20881517     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d449ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  [S2-Ala-iliac screws for extended pelvic fixation in longer lumbar instrumentations : Description of a freehand technique].

Authors:  F Lattig; S Weckbach
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Pullout strength after expandable polymethylmethacrylate transpedicular screw augmentation for pedicle screw loosening.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Yong Jun Cho; Young-Baeg Kim; Seung Won Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-04-24

3.  Effect of surgical factors on the augmentation of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation by a novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite.

Authors:  Haolin Sun; Chun Liu; Shunlun Chen; Yanjie Bai; Huilin Yang; Chunde Li; Lei Yang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Aichmair; M Moser; M R Bauer; E Bachmann; J G Snedeker; M Betz; M Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical Analysis of Capsular Repair Versus Arthrex TFCC Ulnar Tunnel Repair for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears.

Authors:  Jayson C Johnson; Ferris M Pfeiffer; Jill E Jouret; David M Brogan
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-01-11

6.  [Augmented posterior instrumentation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures].

Authors:  D Krappinger; T J Kastenberger; R Schmid
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Lennart Viezens; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing.

Authors:  Rebecca A Kueny; Jan P Kolb; Wolfgang Lehmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation in treatment of senile thoracolumbar tuberculosis combined with severe osteoporosis].

Authors:  Qingda Li; Hao Chen; Tuanjiang Liu; Limin He; Peng Liu; Yuanting Zhao; Jinpeng Du; Peng Zou; Zhengping Zhang; Baorong He; Junsong Yang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-15

10.  Surgical strategies to improve fixation in the osteoporotic spine: the effects of tapping, cement augmentation, and screw trajectory.

Authors:  Craig A Kuhns; Michael Reiter; Ferris Pfeiffer; Theodore J Choma
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2013-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.