Literature DB >> 11117454

An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity.

K R Daffner1, M M Mesulam, L F Scinto, V Calvo, R Faust, P J Holcomb.   

Abstract

This study investigated the functional significance of the N2 response to novel stimuli. In one condition, background, target, and deviant stimuli were simple geometric figures. In a second condition, all stimulus types were unfamiliar/unusual figures. In a third condition, background and target stimuli were unusual figures and deviant stimuli were simple shapes. Unusual figures, whether they were deviant, target, or background stimuli, evoked larger N2 responses than their simple, familiar counterparts. N2 elicited by an unusual background stimulus was larger than that evoked by simple, deviant stimuli, a pattern opposite that exhibited by the subsequent P3. Deviance from immediate context had limited influence over N2 amplitude. The results suggest that novelty N2 and novelty P3 reflect the processing of different aspects of "novel" visual stimuli. The novelty P3 is particularly sensitive to deviation from immediate context. In contrast, the novelty N2 is sensitive to deviation from long-term context that renders a stimulus unfamiliar and difficult to encode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  25 in total

1.  Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; José A Hinojosa; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Francisco Mercado; Manuel Tapia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten; Scott A Rose
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Compensatory neural activity distinguishes different patterns of normal cognitive aging.

Authors:  Jenna L Riis; Hyemi Chong; Katherine K Ryan; David A Wolk; Dorene M Rentz; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Cognitive status impacts age-related changes in attention to novel and target events in normal adults.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Hyemi Chong; Jenna Riis; Dorene M Rentz; David A Wolk; Andrew E Budson; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  J Schomaker; M Meeter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention.

Authors:  Elise C Tarbi; Xue Sun; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Sensitivity to monetary reward is most severely compromised in recently abstaining cocaine addicted individuals: a cross-sectional ERP study.

Authors:  Muhammad A Parvaz; Thomas Maloney; Scott J Moeller; Patricia A Woicik; Nelly Alia-Klein; Frank Telang; Gene-Jack Wang; Nancy K Squires; Nora D Volkow; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  Detecting novelty and significance.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Margaret M Bradley; Maurizio Codispoti; Peter J Lang
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.