Literature DB >> 20879562

Hybrid x-ray/optical luminescence imaging: characterization of experimental conditions.

C M Carpenter1, C Sun, G Pratx, R Rao, L Xing.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The feasibility of x-ray luminescence imaging is investigated using a dual-modality imaging system that merges x-ray and optical imaging. This modality utilizes x-ray activated nanophosphors that luminesce when excited by ionizing photons. By doping phosphors with lanthanides, which emit light in the visible and near infrared range, the luminescence is suitable for biological applications. This study examines practical aspects of this new modality including phosphor concentration, light emission linearity, detector damage, and spectral emission characteristics. Finally, the contrast produced by these phosphors is compared to that of x-ray fluoroscopy.
METHODS: Gadolinium and lanthanum oxysulfide phosphors doped with terbium (green emission) or europium (red emission) were studied. The light emission was imaged in a clinical x-ray scanner with a cooled CCD camera and a spectrophotometer; dose measurements were determined with a calibrated dosimeter. Using these properties, in addition to luminescence efficiency values found in the literature for a similar phosphor, minimum concentration calculations are performed. Finally, a 2.5 cm agar phantom with a 1 cm diameter cylindrical phosphor-filled inclusion (diluted at 10 mg/ml) is imaged to compare x-ray luminescence contrast with x-ray fluoroscopic contrast at a superficial location.
RESULTS: Dose to the CCD camera in the chosen imaging geometry was measured at less than 0.02 cGy/s. Emitted light was found to be linear with dose (R(2)= 1) and concentration (R(2)= 1). Emission peaks for clinical x-ray energies are less than 3 nm full width at half maximum, as expected from lanthanide dopants. The minimum practical concentration necessary to detect luminescent phosphors is dependent on dose; it is estimated that subpicomolar concentrations are detectable at the surface of the tissue with typical mammographic doses, with the minimum detectable concentration increasing with depth and decreasing with dose. In a reflection geometry, x-ray luminescence had nearly a 430-fold greater contrast to background than x-ray fluoroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: X-ray luminescence has the potential to be a promising new modality for enabling molecular imaging within x-ray scanners. Although much work needs to be done to ensure biocompatibility of x-ray exciting phosphors, the benefits of this modality, highlighted in this work, encourage further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20879562      PMCID: PMC2917453          DOI: 10.1118/1.3457332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Assessment of the gain transfer function of phosphors for application in medical imaging radiation detectors.

Authors:  D Cavouras; I Kandarakis; T Maris; G S Panayiotakis; C D Nomicos
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Shedding light onto live molecular targets.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Tomographic optical breast imaging guided by three-dimensional mammography.

Authors:  Ang Li; Eric L Miller; Misha E Kilmer; Thomas J Brukilacchio; Tina Chaves; Jonathan Stott; Quan Zhang; Tao Wu; MaryAnn Chorlton; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; David A Boas
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 4.  Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Contrast-detail analysis characterizing diffuse optical fluorescence tomography image reconstruction.

Authors:  Scott C Davis; Brian W Pogue; Hamid Dehghani; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 6.  Molecular imaging in the clinical arena.

Authors:  Farouc A Jaffer; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  X-ray induced luminescence and spatial resolution of La2O2S:Tb phosphor screens.

Authors:  I Kandarakis; D Cavouras; G Panayiotakis; T Agelis; C Nomicos; G Giakoumakis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  New concepts in therapeutic photomedicine: photochemistry, optical targeting and the therapeutic window.

Authors:  J A Parrish
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Intraoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer: technical notes.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Giovanna Gatti; Alberto Luini; Mattia Intra; Roberto Orecchia; Patrick Borgen; Michael Zelefsky; Beryl McCormick; Virgilio Sacchini
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Transillumination fluorescence imaging in mice using biocompatible upconverting nanoparticles.

Authors:  Claudio Vinegoni; Daniel Razansky; Scott A Hilderbrand; Fangwei Shao; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.776

View more
  31 in total

1.  Collimator Width Optimization in X-Ray Luminescent Computed Tomography (XLCT) with Selective Excitation Scheme.

Authors:  S Mishra; R Kappiyoor
Journal:  J Med Imaging Health Inform       Date:  2014-10

2.  Spectrally resolving and scattering-compensated x-ray luminescence/fluorescence computed tomography.

Authors:  Wenxiang Cong; Haiou Shen; Ge Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Sensitivity evaluation and selective plane imaging geometry for x-ray-induced luminescence imaging.

Authors:  Bryan P Quigley; Corey D Smith; Shih-Hsun Cheng; Jeffrey S Souris; Charles A Pelizzari; Chin-Tu Chen; Leu-Wei Lo; Chester S Reft; Rodney D Wiersma; Patrick J La Riviere
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Monitoring external beam radiotherapy using real-time beam visualization.

Authors:  Cesare H Jenkins; Dominik J Naczynski; Shu-Jung S Yu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Sensitivity study of x-ray luminescence computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael C Lun; Wei Zhang; Changqing Li
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 6.  Optical and x-ray technology synergies enabling diagnostic and therapeutic applications in medicine.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  X-ray acoustic computed tomography with pulsed x-ray beam from a medical linear accelerator.

Authors:  Liangzhong Xiang; Bin Han; Colin Carpenter; Guillem Pratx; Yu Kuang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Numerical simulation of x-ray luminescence optical tomography for small-animal imaging.

Authors:  Changqing Li; Arnulfo Martínez-Dávalos; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Cone Beam X-ray Luminescence Computed Tomography Based on Bayesian Method.

Authors:  Guanglei Zhang; Fei Liu; Jie Liu; Jianwen Luo; Yaoqin Xie; Jing Bai; Lei Xing
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  Nanotechnologies for noninvasive measurement of drug release.

Authors:  Thomas Moore; Hongyu Chen; Rachel Morrison; Fenglin Wang; Jeffrey N Anker; Frank Alexis
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.