Literature DB >> 28703922

Sensitivity evaluation and selective plane imaging geometry for x-ray-induced luminescence imaging.

Bryan P Quigley1, Corey D Smith1, Shih-Hsun Cheng1, Jeffrey S Souris1, Charles A Pelizzari2, Chin-Tu Chen1, Leu-Wei Lo1, Chester S Reft2, Rodney D Wiersma2, Patrick J La Riviere1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: X-ray-induced luminescence (XIL) is a hybrid x-ray/optical imaging modality that employs nanophosphors that luminescence in response to x-ray irradiation. X-ray-activated phosphorescent nanoparticles have potential applications in radiation therapy as theranostics, nanodosimeters, or radiosensitizers. Extracting clinically relevant information from the luminescent signal requires the development of a robust imaging model that can determine nanophosphor distributions at depth in an optically scattering environment from surface radiance measurements. The applications of XIL in radiotherapy will be limited by the dose-dependent sensitivity at depth in tissue. We propose a novel geometry called selective plane XIL (SPXIL), and apply it to experimental measurements in optical gel phantoms and sensitivity simulations.
METHODS: An imaging model is presented based on the selective plane geometry which can determine the detected diffuse optical signal for a given x-ray dose and nanophosphor distribution at depth in a semi-infinite, optically homogenous material. The surface radiance in the model is calculated using an analytical solution to the extrapolated boundary condition. Y2 O3 :Eu3+ nanoparticles are synthesized and inserted into various optical phantom in order to measure the luminescent output per unit dose for a given concentration of nanophosphors and calibrate an imaging model for XIL sensitivity simulations. SPXIL imaging with a dual-source optical gel phantom is performed, and an iterative Richardson-Lucy deconvolution using a shifted Poisson noise model is applied to the measurements in order to reconstruct the nanophosphor distribution.
RESULTS: Nanophosphor characterizations showed a peak emission at 611 nm, a linear luminescent response to tube current and nanoparticle concentration, and a quadratic luminescent response to tube voltage. The luminescent efficiency calculation accomplished with calibrated bioluminescence mouse phantoms determines 1.06 photons were emitted per keV of x-ray radiation absorbed per g/mL of nanophosphor concentration. Sensitivity simulations determined that XIL could detect a concentration of 1 mg/mL of nanophosphors with a dose of 1 cGy at a depth ranging from 2 to 4 cm, depending on the optical parameters of the homogeneous diffuse optical environment. The deconvolution applied to the SPXIL measurements could resolve two sources 1 cm apart up to a depth of 1.75 cm in the diffuse phantom.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a novel imaging geometry for XIL in a homogenous, diffuse optical environment. Basic characterization of Y2 O3 :Eu3+ nanophosphors are presented along with XIL/SPXIL measurements in optical gel phantoms. The diffuse optical imaging model is validated using these measurements and then calibrated in order to execute initial sensitivity simulations for the dose-depth limitations of XIL imaging. The SPXIL imaging model is used to perform a deconvolution on a dual-source phantom, which successfully reconstructs the nanophosphor distributions.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deconvolution; luminescence; nanoparticles; optical imaging; x-rays

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28703922      PMCID: PMC5646227          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  Tomographic molecular imaging of x-ray-excitable nanoparticles.

Authors:  Guillem Pratx; Colin M Carpenter; Conroy Sun; Ravi P Rao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Performance dependence of hybrid x-ray computed tomography/fluorescence molecular tomography on the optical forward problem.

Authors:  Damon Hyde; Ralf Schulz; Dana Brooks; Eric Miller; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  The two-photon excitation of SiO(2)-coated Y(2)O(3):Eu(3+) nanoparticles by a near-infrared femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Qiang Lü; Aihua Li; Fengyun Guo; Liang Sun; Liancheng Zhao
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.874

Review 4.  Optical properties of biological tissues: a review.

Authors:  Steven L Jacques
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer.

Authors:  R C Haskell; L O Svaasand; T T Tsay; T C Feng; M S McAdams; B J Tromberg
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  A solid tissue phantom for photon migration studies.

Authors:  R Cubeddu; A Pifferi; P Taroni; A Torricelli; G Valentini
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Time-gated Cherenkov emission spectroscopy from linear accelerator irradiation of tissue phantoms.

Authors:  Adam K Glaser; Rongxiao Zhang; Scott C Davis; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Beam and tissue factors affecting Cherenkov image intensity for quantitative entrance and exit dosimetry on human tissue.

Authors:  Rongxiao Zhang; Adam K Glaser; Jacqueline Andreozzi; Shudong Jiang; Lesley A Jarvis; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.207

9.  X-ray luminescence optical tomography imaging: experimental studies.

Authors:  Changqing Li; Kun Di; Julien Bec; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.776

10.  Nanoscale metal-organic framework for highly effective photodynamic therapy of resistant head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Kuangda Lu; Chunbai He; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  1 in total

1.  Background luminescence in x-ray luminescence computed tomography (XLCT) imaging.

Authors:  Michael C Lun; Changqing Li
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.980

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.