Literature DB >> 20878518

Can artificial urinary sphincter be an effective salvage option in women following failed anti-incontinence surgery?

Eric Chung1, Anojan Navaratnam, Ross A Cartmill.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The role of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) as salvage option following failed anti-incontinence surgery is unclear.
METHODS: Database review and telephone survey were conducted to review patient satisfaction, surgical outcomes, device failure and revision rates.
RESULTS: A total of 29 female patients received AUS following failed anti-incontinence surgeries. Five (17%) AUS devices were explanted due to AUS erosion or infection. Thirteen AUS revisions were made and device malfunction accounted for 95% of the cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed more than 90% of AUS malfunction occurred less than 100 months from the time of implant. There was a significant decrease in pad use (3.6 to 0.2 pads per day; p < 0.01). The continence rate with no pad use was 70% and this increases to 83% in patients wearing one precautionary pad.
CONCLUSION: AUS is a safe, durable and effective salvage option for females with previous failed anti-incontinent surgeries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20878518     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1268-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  11 in total

1.  Outcome of the artificial urinary sphincter in female patients.

Authors:  K Thomas; S N Venn; A R Mundy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Use of the artificial urinary sphincter in women.

Authors:  J J Kowalczyk; J J Mulcahy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2000-06

3.  The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters.

Authors:  S N Venn; T J Greenwell; A R Mundy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  25-year experience in the outcome of artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Ross A Cartmill
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Stress urinary incontinence and the future of urology.

Authors:  Bart L H Bemelmans
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  The artificial urinary sphincter in the female: indications for use, surgical approach and results.

Authors:  D S Elliott; D M Barrett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

7.  The use of an artificial urinary sphincter in women with type III incontinence and a negative Marshall test.

Authors:  P Costa; N Mottet; B Rabut; R Thuret; K Ben Naoum; L Wagner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Comparison of the efficacy of Burch colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, and tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  S W Bai; W H Sohn; D J Chung; J H Park; S K Kim
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Comparison of the long-term outcomes between incontinent men and women treated with artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors:  Virgilio G Petero; Ananias C Diokno
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up.

Authors:  K L Ward; P Hilton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Outcome measures for stress urinary incontinence treatment: can we minimally agree?

Authors:  Véronique Phé; Philippe Zimmern; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  A systematic review of the treatment for female stress urinary incontinence by ACT® balloon placement (Uromedica, Irvine, CA, USA).

Authors:  Véronique Phé; Kien Nguyen; Morgan Rouprêt; Vincent Cardot; Jérôme Parra; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Artificial urinary sphincter surgery in the special populations: neurological, revision, concurrent penile prosthesis and female stress urinary incontinence groups.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.