Literature DB >> 11257664

The use of an artificial urinary sphincter in women with type III incontinence and a negative Marshall test.

P Costa1, N Mottet, B Rabut, R Thuret, K Ben Naoum, L Wagner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluate the efficacy of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter in women with type III incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 207 women with genuine stress incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Primary inclusion criterion was a negative Marshall test. A modified surgical procedure was used to implant the AMS 800 through an abdominal approach, with placement of the cuff around the bladder neck between the periurethral fascia and vagina. Followup data were available for 206 women, including 179 with nonneurogenic and 27 with neurogenic bladders (mean followup 3.9 years).
RESULTS: There were 12 (5.9%) explantations due to the prosthesis either through an erosion, extrusion or both that were necessary. The only significant risk factor for explantation was perioperative injury. This injury resulted in 8 explantations in 49 patients compared with 4 in 155 who did not have such injuries (p = 0.0016). Of the 190 patients with working devices continence was achieved in 88.7% (49 of 168) and 81.8% (18 of 22) of those with nonneurogenic and neurogenic bladders, respectively. Social continence (slight leakage but no pad use) was reported by 7.7% (13 of 168) and 9.1% (2 of 22) of patients in the nonneurogenic and neurogenic groups, respectively. The remaining patients reported leakage and pad use.
CONCLUSIONS: The AMS 800 can be used successfully to treat women with genuine stress incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency. The modified surgical approach resulted in fewer perioperative injuries and, consequently, a low explantation rate. Women with genuine stress incontinence, a low urethral closure pressure and negative Marshall test indicating severe intrinsic sphincter deficiency are potential candidates for artificial urinary sphincter implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11257664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  Transurethral injection of bulking agent for treatment of failed mid-urethral sling procedures.

Authors:  Ha Na Lee; Young-Suk Lee; Ji-Yeon Han; Jae Yong Jeong; Myung-Soo Choo; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Can artificial urinary sphincter be an effective salvage option in women following failed anti-incontinence surgery?

Authors:  Eric Chung; Anojan Navaratnam; Ross A Cartmill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Treatment options for intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

Authors:  Sovrin M Shah; Geoffrey S Gaunay
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Management of failed stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Lara S MacLachlan; Eric S Rovner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Joint report on the terminology for surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Outcome measures for stress urinary incontinence treatment: can we minimally agree?

Authors:  Véronique Phé; Philippe Zimmern; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Is the implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter with a large cuff in women with severe urinary incontinence associated with worse perioperative complications and functional outcomes than usual?

Authors:  Aurélie Revaux; Morgan Rouprêt; Elise Seringe; Vincent Misraï; Florence Cour; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  [Therapy of persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence].

Authors:  A Soave; O Engel; M Rink; M Fisch; R Dahlem
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Treatment of female and male stress urinary incontinence. Current aspects].

Authors:  B Amend; C Reisenauer; A Stenzl; K-D Sievert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  [Management of female stress urinary incontinence. Endoscopic extraperitoneal artificial urinary sphincter--early experience].

Authors:  M R Hoda; A Gauruder-Burmester; C Kümmel; T Nitzke; G Popken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.