Literature DB >> 16407005

Comparison of the long-term outcomes between incontinent men and women treated with artificial urinary sphincter.

Virgilio G Petero1, Ananias C Diokno.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the long-term outcome of AUS between men and women who received the device for the management of stress urinary incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1983 and January 2004, 126 consecutive patients received the AUS AMS 800 at our center placed by the senior author (ACD). Of these patients 108 (53 men, 55 women) and 168 devices (88 in men, 80 in women) were available for review. Outcome measures include complications, duration and etiology of AUS failure, and satisfactory continence.
RESULTS: Mean followup was 8.1 +/- 5.6 years. Of the 108 patients 18 (40%) men and 31 (56%) women had no complications (p = 0.09). Of the 168 devices 76 (45%) eventually failed (44 or 50% in men, 32 or 40% in women, p = 0.19). The incidences of failed device classified as mechanical, nonmechanical or iatrogenic were not significantly different (p = 0.07). Median device durations were 6.9 and 11.2 years in men and women, respectively (p = 0.002). Satisfactory continence was achieved in 82% of patients, in 43 (81%) men and in 46 (84%) women (p = 0.73), including 5 (9%) men and 35 (64%) women who were dry (0 pads, p = 0.01), 28 (53%) men and 4 (7%) women who wear 1 pad (p = 0.01), and 10 (19%) men and 7 (13%) women who use 2 pads per day.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in overall satisfactory continence and device failure rates. However, women have a higher dry rate (0 pad use) and longer functioning device duration compared to their male counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16407005     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00243-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

1.  [Reconstructive urology in transition. From its origin into the all too near future].

Authors:  K-D Sievert; J Seibold; D Schultheiss; G Feil; H Sperling; M Fisch; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Can artificial urinary sphincter be an effective salvage option in women following failed anti-incontinence surgery?

Authors:  Eric Chung; Anojan Navaratnam; Ross A Cartmill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence: preliminary comparison of robot-assisted and open approaches.

Authors:  Benoit Peyronnet; Sébastien Vincendeau; Lauranne Tondut; Karim Bensalah; Mireille Damphousse; Andréa Manunta
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  [Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R M Bauer; M E Mayer; C Gratzke; I Soljanik; P J Bastian; C G Stief; C Gozzi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter in female with neurological stress urinary incontinence: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Thibault Tricard; A Schirmann; P Munier; A Schroeder; C Saussine
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Outcome measures for stress urinary incontinence treatment: can we minimally agree?

Authors:  Véronique Phé; Philippe Zimmern; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Is the implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter with a large cuff in women with severe urinary incontinence associated with worse perioperative complications and functional outcomes than usual?

Authors:  Aurélie Revaux; Morgan Rouprêt; Elise Seringe; Vincent Misraï; Florence Cour; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  [Treatment of female and male stress urinary incontinence. Current aspects].

Authors:  B Amend; C Reisenauer; A Stenzl; K-D Sievert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  [Management of female stress urinary incontinence. Endoscopic extraperitoneal artificial urinary sphincter--early experience].

Authors:  M R Hoda; A Gauruder-Burmester; C Kümmel; T Nitzke; G Popken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  A systematic review of the treatment for female stress urinary incontinence by ACT® balloon placement (Uromedica, Irvine, CA, USA).

Authors:  Véronique Phé; Kien Nguyen; Morgan Rouprêt; Vincent Cardot; Jérôme Parra; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.