Literature DB >> 15817614

Prostate cancer risk and DNA damage: translational significance of selenium supplementation in a canine model.

David J Waters1, Shuren Shen, Lawrence T Glickman, Dawn M Cooley, David G Bostwick, Junqi Qian, Gerald F Combs, J Steven Morris.   

Abstract

Daily supplementation with the essential trace mineral selenium significantly reduced prostate cancer risk in men in the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial. However, the optimal intake of selenium for prostate cancer prevention is unknown. We hypothesized that selenium significantly regulates the extent of genotoxic damage within the aging prostate and that the relationship between dietary selenium intake and DNA damage is non-linear, i.e. more selenium is not necessarily better. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a randomized feeding trial in which 49 elderly beagle dogs (physiologically equivalent to 62-69-year-old men) received nutritionally adequate or supranutritional levels of selenium for 7 months, in order to mimic the range of dietary selenium intake of men in the United States. Our results demonstrate an intriguing U-shaped dose-response relationship between selenium status (toenail selenium concentration) and the extent of DNA damage (alkaline Comet assay) within the prostate. Further, we demonstrate that the concentration of selenium that minimizes DNA damage in the aging dog prostate remarkably parallels the selenium concentration in men that minimizes prostate cancer risk. By studying elderly dogs, the only non-human animal model of spontaneous prostate cancer, we have established a new approach to bridge the gap between laboratory and human studies that can be used to select the appropriate dose of anticancer agents for large-scale human cancer prevention trials. From the U-shaped dose-response, it follows that not all men will necessarily benefit from increasing their selenium intake and that measurement of baseline nutrient status should be required for all individuals in prevention trials to avoid oversupplementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15817614     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  28 in total

1.  Low doses of selenium specifically stimulate the repair of oxidative DNA damage in LNCaP prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Viviana de Rosa; Pinar Erkekoğlu; Anne Forestier; Alain Favier; Filiz Hincal; Alan M Diamond; Thierry Douki; Walid Rachidi
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2012-01-25

2.  Selenomethionine and alpha-tocopherol do not inhibit prostate carcinogenesis in the testosterone plus estradiol-treated NBL rat model.

Authors:  Nur Ozten; Lori Horton; Salamia Lasano; Maarten C Bosland
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-02-23

3.  Defining the Optimal Selenium Dose for Prostate Cancer Risk Reduction: Insights from the U-Shaped Relationship between Selenium Status, DNA Damage, and Apoptosis.

Authors:  Emily C Chiang; Shuren Shen; Seema S Kengeri; Huiping Xu; Gerald F Combs; J Steven Morris; David G Bostwick; David J Waters
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 4.  Selenium at the redox interface of the genome, metabolome and exposome.

Authors:  Jolyn Fernandes; Xin Hu; M Ryan Smith; Young-Mi Go; Dean P Jones
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  Imbalance in Protein Thiol Redox Regulation and Cancer-Preventive Efficacy of Selenium.

Authors:  Rayudu Gopalakrishna; Usha Gundimeda; Sarah Zhou; Kristen Zung; Kaitlyn Forell; Arne Holmgren
Journal:  React Oxyg Species (Apex)       Date:  2016-05-25

6.  Selenium: its role as antioxidant in human health.

Authors:  Ujang Tinggi
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 7.  Devising a new dialogue for nutrition science: how life course perspective, U-shaped thinking, whole organism thinking, and language precision contribute to our understanding of biological heterogeneity and forge a fresh advance toward precision medicine.

Authors:  David J Waters
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Toward understanding success and failures in the use of selenium for cancer prevention.

Authors:  Holger Steinbrenner; Bodo Speckmann; Helmut Sies
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  Prevention of mutation, cancer, and other age-associated diseases by optimizing micronutrient intake.

Authors:  Bruce N Ames
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-09-22

Review 10.  Does a role for selenium in DNA damage repair explain apparent controversies in its use in chemoprevention?

Authors:  Soumen Bera; Viviana De Rosa; Walid Rachidi; Alan M Diamond
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.