Literature DB >> 20876972

In vivo transcranial cavitation threshold detection during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice.

Yao-Sheng Tung1, Fotios Vlachos, James J Choi, Thomas Deffieux, Kirsten Selert, Elisa E Konofagou.   

Abstract

The in vivo cavitation response associated with blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening as induced by transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) in conjunction with microbubbles was studied in order to better identify the underlying mechanism in its noninvasive application. A cylindrically focused hydrophone, confocal with the FUS transducer, was used as a passive cavitation detector (PCD) to identify the threshold of inertial cavitation (IC) in the presence of Definity® microbubbles (mean diameter range: 1.1-3.3 µm, Lantheus Medical Imaging, MA, USA). A vessel phantom was first used to determine the reliability of the PCD prior to in vivo use. A cerebral blood vessel was simulated by generating a cylindrical channel of 610 µm in diameter inside a polyacrylamide gel and by saturating its volume with microbubbles. The microbubbles were sonicated through an excised mouse skull. Second, the same PCD setup was employed for in vivo noninvasive (i.e. transdermal and transcranial) cavitation detection during BBB opening. After the intravenous administration of Definity® microbubbles, pulsed FUS was applied (frequency: 1.525 or 1.5 MHz, peak-rarefactional pressure: 0.15-0.60 MPa, duty cycle: 20%, PRF: 10 Hz, duration: 1 min with a 30 s interval) to the right hippocampus of twenty-six (n = 26) mice in vivo through intact scalp and skull. T1 and T2-weighted MR images were used to verify the BBB opening. A spectrogram was generated at each pressure in order to detect the IC onset and duration. The threshold of BBB opening was found to be at a 0.30 MPa peak-rarefactional pressure in vivo. Both the phantom and in vivo studies indicated that the IC pressure threshold had a peak-rarefactional amplitude of 0.45 MPa. This indicated that BBB opening may not require IC at or near the threshold. Histological analysis showed that BBB opening could be induced without any cellular damage at 0.30 and 0.45 MPa. In conclusion, the cavitation response could be detected without craniotomy in mice and IC may not be required for BBB opening at relatively low pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20876972      PMCID: PMC4005785          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  35 in total

1.  Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review.

Authors:  W L Nyborg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Resonance frequency of microbubbles in small blood vessels: a numerical study.

Authors:  E Sassaroli; K Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  High-frequency dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Dustin E Kruse; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Inertial cavitation dose produced in ex vivo rabbit ear arteries with Optison by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Juan Tu; Thomas J Matula; Andrew A Brayman; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective.

Authors:  M W Miller; D L Miller; A A Brayman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Cavitation microjets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in ESWL.

Authors:  L A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A precise technique for the measurement of acoustic cavitation thresholds and some preliminary results.

Authors:  R A Roy; A A Atchley; L A Crum; J B Fowlkes; J J Reidy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  MRI-guided targeted blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound: histological findings in rabbits.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Scott Raymond; Ferenc A Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits.

Authors:  K Hynynen; N McDannold; N Vykhodtseva; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Numerical study of a simple transcranial focused ultrasound system applied to blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Thomas Deffieux; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  98 in total

1.  Blood-brain barrier: real-time feedback-controlled focused ultrasound disruption by using an acoustic emissions-based controller.

Authors:  Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Ultrasound enhanced drug delivery to the brain and central nervous system.

Authors:  Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.914

3.  Neuronavigation-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: a preliminary study in swine.

Authors:  K-C Wei; H-C Tsai; Y-J Lu; H-W Yang; M-Y Hua; M-F Wu; P-Y Chen; C-Y Huang; T-C Yen; H-L Liu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Promising approaches to circumvent the blood-brain barrier: progress, pitfalls and clinical prospects in brain cancer.

Authors:  Iason T Papademetriou; Tyrone Porter
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2015-08-25

5.  Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Evaluating the safety profile of focused ultrasound and microbubble-mediated treatments to increase blood-brain barrier permeability.

Authors:  Dallan McMahon; Charissa Poon; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 6.648

7.  Transcranial cavitation detection in primates during blood-brain barrier opening--a performance assessment study.

Authors:  Shih-Ying Wu; Yao-Sheng Tung; Fabrice Marquet; Matthew Downs; Carlos Sanchez; Cherry Chen; Vincent Ferrera; Elisa Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Targeted drug delivery with focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening using acoustically-activated nanodroplets.

Authors:  Cherry C Chen; Paul S Sheeran; Shih-Ying Wu; Oluyemi O Olumolade; Paul A Dayton; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Costas D Arvanitis; Phillip M Alexander; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.