BACKGROUND: Infection by Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted infection (STI) world wide. The most frequently used diagnostic test for CT is a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), which is highly sensitive and specific. To further shorten time delay until diagnosis has been made, in order to prevent CT spread, the use of point-of-care (POC) tests may be the way forward. OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic performance of three POC tests, Handilab-C, Biorapid CHLAMYDIA Ag test and QuickVue Chlamydia test, was evaluated and compared with NAAT. METHODS: All women, above the age of 16 years, attending for a consultation at an STI clinic between September 2007 and April 2008, were asked to participate. Women were asked to complete a short questionnaire and to collect six self-taken vaginal swabs (SVS). SVS 2 was used for NAAT and SVS 3 to 5 were randomised for the different POC tests. SVS 1 and 6 were used for determining quantitative CT load to validate the use of successive SVS. All POC tests were performed without knowledge of NAAT results. NAAT was used as the 'gold standard'. RESULTS: 772 women were included. CT prevalence was 11% in our population. Sensitivities of the Biorapid CHLAMYDIA Ag test, QuickVue Chlamydia and Handilab-C test were 17%, 27% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated POC tests, owing to their very low sensitivities, are not ready for widespread use. These results underline the need for good-quality assurance of POC tests, especially in view of the increased availability of these tests on the internet.
BACKGROUND:Infection by Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted infection (STI) world wide. The most frequently used diagnostic test for CT is a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), which is highly sensitive and specific. To further shorten time delay until diagnosis has been made, in order to prevent CT spread, the use of point-of-care (POC) tests may be the way forward. OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic performance of three POC tests, Handilab-C, Biorapid CHLAMYDIA Ag test and QuickVue Chlamydia test, was evaluated and compared with NAAT. METHODS: All women, above the age of 16 years, attending for a consultation at an STI clinic between September 2007 and April 2008, were asked to participate. Women were asked to complete a short questionnaire and to collect six self-taken vaginal swabs (SVS). SVS 2 was used for NAAT and SVS 3 to 5 were randomised for the different POC tests. SVS 1 and 6 were used for determining quantitative CT load to validate the use of successive SVS. All POC tests were performed without knowledge of NAAT results. NAAT was used as the 'gold standard'. RESULTS: 772 women were included. CT prevalence was 11% in our population. Sensitivities of the Biorapid CHLAMYDIA Ag test, QuickVue Chlamydia and Handilab-C test were 17%, 27% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated POC tests, owing to their very low sensitivities, are not ready for widespread use. These results underline the need for good-quality assurance of POC tests, especially in view of the increased availability of these tests on the internet.
Authors: Elain Fu; Tinny Liang; Jared Houghtaling; Sujatha Ramachandran; Stephen A Ramsey; Barry Lutz; Paul Yager Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Martine H P Ickenroth; Janaica E J Grispen; Gaby Ronda; Marloes Tacken; Geert-Jan Dinant; Nanne K de Vries; Trudy van der Weijden Journal: Health Expect Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Sepehr N Tabrizi; Magnus Unemo; Daniel Golparian; Jimmy Twin; Athena E Limnios; Monica Lahra; Rebecca Guy Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Joany Jackman; Manny Uy; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Anne Rompalo; Terry Hogan; Jill Huppert; Mary Jett-Goheen; Charlotte Gaydos Journal: Point Care Date: 2012-06