Literature DB >> 22919287

Minding the Gap: An approach to determine critical drivers in the development of Point of Care diagnostics.

Joany Jackman1, Manny Uy, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Anne Rompalo, Terry Hogan, Jill Huppert, Mary Jett-Goheen, Charlotte Gaydos.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A point of care test (POCT) for Chlamydia trachomatis detection is an urgent public health need. Technology advances in diagnostics have made solutions possible. Yet no reliable POCT exist. Our goal was to address the gap between chlamydia POCT needs and successful POCT development by determining which characteristics of POCT tests are most critical and if any flexibility in the attributes assigned those characteristics exist between technology developer and end user.
METHODS: We employed a process known as WALEX (Warfare Analysis Laboratory Exercise) in combination with Design of Experiment (DOE) methodology using discrete choice experiments (DCE), to describe the attributes of the most realistic, rather than the most ideal POCT. The WALEX was conducted as interactive oral and simultaneous electronic discussion among experts with differing expertise, but linked by a common interest in development of a chlamydia POCT.
RESULTS: Our studies demonstrated which features of the ideal chlamydia POCT were considered critical to test acceptance by users and which were open to negotiation. In particular, end users were more lenient on the requirement for the fastest ideal test and the lowest one time instrument costs, if the requirement for higher throughput, lowest cost and vaginal sample source collection were preserved. DOE methods used in forced choice question design provided confirmation of opinions derived from oral and electronic WALEX comments
CONCLUSIONS: The WALEX in combination with DCE helped us achieve our goal in identifying the gaps in the chlamydia POCT and determining the most realistic solutions to bridge those gaps.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22919287      PMCID: PMC3423323          DOI: 10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a25fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Point Care        ISSN: 1533-029X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Rapid tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs): the way forward.

Authors:  R W Peeling; K K Holmes; D Mabey; A Ronald
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Alarmingly poor performance in Chlamydia trachomatis point-of-care testing.

Authors:  Laura van Dommelen; Frank H van Tiel; Sander Ouburg; Elfi E H G Brouwers; Peter H W Terporten; Paul H M Savelkoul; Servaas A Morré; Cathrien A Bruggeman; Christian J P A Hoebe
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Acceptability of self-testing for trichomoniasis increases with experience.

Authors:  Jill S Huppert; Elizabeth A Hesse; Molly A Bernard; Yang Xiao; Bin Huang; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  What's the Point? How Point-of-Care STI Tests Can Impact Infected Patients.

Authors:  Jill Huppert; Elizabeth Hesse; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences.

Authors:  M Ryan; A Bate; C J Eastmond; A Ludbrook
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

6.  Perceptions of an ideal point-of-care test for sexually transmitted infections--a qualitative study of focus group discussions with medical providers.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; M Terry Hogan; Mathilda Barnes; Mary Jett-Goheen; Jill Huppert; Anne M Rompalo; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Verity Watson; Andrew Carnon; Mandy Ryan; Derek Cox
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.341

8.  What qualities are most important to making a point of care test desirable for clinicians and others offering sexually transmitted infection testing?

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Charlotte A Gaydos; M Terry Hogan; O Manuel Uy; Joany Jackman; Mary Jett-Goheen; Ariel Albertie; Derek T Dangerfield; Celia R Neustadt; Zachary S Wiener; Anne M Rompalo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Point-of-Care Technology Research Network: Advancing Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Penny Ford Carleton; Steven Schachter; John A Parrish; John M Collins; J Benjamin Crocker; Ronald F Dixon; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Kent B Lewandrowski; James E Stahl; Catherine Klapperich; Mario Cabodi; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anne M Rompalo; Yukari Manabe; Tza-Huei Wang; Richard Rothman; Chris D Geddes; Lea Widdice; Joany Jackman; Rishi A Mathura; Tiffani Bailey Lash
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  "It's not a time spent issue, it's a 'what have you spent your time doing?' issue…" A qualitative study of UK patient opinions and expectations for implementation of Point of Care Tests for sexually transmitted infections and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Sebastian S Fuller; Agata Pacho; Claire E Broad; Achyuta V Nori; Emma M Harding-Esch; Syed Tariq Sadiq
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Diagnosing sexually transmitted infections in resource-constrained settings: challenges and ways forward.

Authors:  Teodora Ec Wi; Francis J Ndowa; Cecilia Ferreyra; Cassandra Kelly-Cirino; Melanie M Taylor; Igor Toskin; James Kiarie; Nancy Santesso; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.396

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.