Literature DB >> 20875089

Pathological results and rates of treatment failure in high-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.

Jochen Walz1, Steven Joniau1, Felix K Chun1, Hendrik Isbarn1, Claudio Jeldres1, Ofer Yossepowitch1, Hsu Chao-Yu1, Eric A Klein1, Peter T Scardino1, Alwyn Reuther1, Hein Van Poppel1, Markus Graefen1, Hartwig Huland1, Pierre I Karakiewicz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To investigate the pathological characteristics and the rates of biochemical recurrence (BCR) -free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with high-risk prostate cancer.
METHODS: • Of 4760 patients treated with RP for prostate cancer at three institutions, 293 patients (6.2%) had clinical stage T3, 269 (5.7%) had a biopsy Gleason sum ≥ 8, 370 (7.8%) had preoperative PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL and 887 (18.6%) were considered high-risk according to the D'Amico classification (clinical stage ≥ T2c or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 20 ng/mL or biopsy Gleason sum ≥ 8). • Actuarial BCR-free survival probabilities after RP and the rate of favourable pathology (organ-confined cancer, negative surgical margin and Gleason ≤ 7) were assessed.
RESULTS: • Median follow up was 2.4 years and 1179 (24.8%) patients had follow up beyond 5 years. • The rate of favourable pathology increased in the following order: clinical stage T3 (13.7%), biopsy Gleason ≥ 8 (16.4%), the D'Amico high-risk group (21.4%) and PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL (21.6%). • The 5-year BCR-free survival probabilities were 35.4% for Gleason ≥ 8, 39.8% for PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL, 47.4% for D'Amico high-risk group and 51.6% for clinical stage T3. • Patients with only one risk factor had the most favourable 5-year BCR-free survival (50.3%), relative to patients with two or more risk factors (27.5%)
CONCLUSIONS:Men with clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer do not have a uniformly poor prognosis after RP. • The rate of favourable pathology and of BCR-free survival may vary substantially, depending on the definition used. • RP should be considered a valid treatment modality for high-risk prostate cancer patients, as many can be surgically down-staged.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875089     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09594.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  45 in total

1.  Safe-R: a novel score, accounting for oncological safe nerve-sparing at radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Carolina Coelius; Meike Adam; Pierre Tennstedt; Luis Kluth; Thomas Steuber; Hans Heinzer; Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm; Uwe Michl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Impact of stage migration and practice changes on high-risk prostate cancer: results from patients treated with radical prostatectomy over the last two decades.

Authors:  Nicola Fossati; Niccolò M Passoni; Marco Moschini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Alessandro Larcher; Massimo Freschi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  [Radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  P Mandel; D Tilki; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Surgery for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan Schmitges; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jochen Walz; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-08

5.  Heterogeneous oncologic outcomes according to surgical pathology in high-risk prostate cancer: implications for better risk stratification and preoperative prediction of oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Seung-Kwon Choi; Myungsun Shim; Myong Kim; Myungchan Park; Sangmi Lee; Cheryn Song; Hyung-Lae Lee; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Older patients with low Charlson score and high-risk prostate cancer benefit from radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Sivaraman; G Ordaz Jurado; X Cathelineau; Eric Barret; P Dell'Oglio; S Joniau; M Bianchi; A Briganti; M Spahn; P Bastian; J Chun; P Chlosta; P Gontero; M Graefen; R Jeffrey Karnes; G Marchioro; B Tombal; L Tosco; H Henk van der Poel; R Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Is radical prostatectomy a useful therapeutic option for high-risk prostate cancer in older men?

Authors:  Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012

8.  Predicting prostate cancer-specific outcome after radical prostatectomy among men with very high-risk cT3b/4 PCa: a multi-institutional outcome study of 266 patients.

Authors:  F Moltzahn; J Karnes; P Gontero; B Kneitz; B Tombal; P Bader; A Briganti; F Montorsi; H Van Poppel; S Joniau; M Spahn
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 9.  The evolving role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elan Diamond; María del Carmen Garcias; Beerinder Karir; Scott T Tagawa
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 10.  The very-high-risk prostate cancer: a contemporary update.

Authors:  R Mano; J Eastham; O Yossepowitch
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.