Literature DB >> 20874846

Sex-specific effects of inbreeding in wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster under benign and stressful conditions.

L S Enders1, L Nunney.   

Abstract

In animal populations, sib mating is often the primary source of inbreeding depression (ID). We used recently wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to test whether such ID is amplified by environmental stress and, in males, by sexual selection. We also investigated whether increased ID because of stress (increased larval competition) persisted beyond the stressed stage and whether the effects of stress and sexual selection interacted. Sib mating resulted in substantial cumulative fitness losses (egg to adult reproduction) of 50% (benign) and 73% (stressed). Stress increased ID during the larval period (23% vs. 63%), but not during post-stress reproductive stages (36% vs. 31%), indicating larval stress may have purged some adult genetic load (although ID was uncorrelated across stages). Sexual selection exacerbated inbreeding depression, with inbred male offspring suffering a higher reproductive cost than females, independent of stress (57% vs. 14% benign, 49% vs. 11% stress).
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20874846     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02085.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  11 in total

1.  Reduction in the cumulative effect of stress-induced inbreeding depression due to intragenerational purging in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L S Enders; L Nunney
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Recessive Z-linked lethals and the retention of haplotype diversity in a captive butterfly population.

Authors:  Ilik J Saccheri; Samuel Whiteford; Carl J Yung; Arjen E Van't Hof
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Seasonal stress drives predictable changes in inbreeding depression in field-tested captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laramy S Enders; Leonard Nunney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  High genetic load in an old isolated butterfly population.

Authors:  Anniina L K Mattila; Anne Duplouy; Malla Kirjokangas; Rainer Lehtonen; Pasi Rastas; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Differential allocation in a lekking bird: females lay larger eggs and are more likely to have male chicks when they mate with less related males.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sardell; Emily H DuVal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sex-biased mortality associated with inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stephen P Robinson; Leigh W Simmons; W Jason Kennington
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Intrinsic differences between males and females determine sex-specific consequences of inbreeding.

Authors:  Emily R Ebel; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Sustained positive consequences of genetic rescue of fitness and behavioural traits in inbred populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel Bang Jørgensen; Michael Ørsted; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.516

9.  Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Outi Ala-Honkola; David J Hosken; Mollie K Manier; Stefan Lüpold; Elizabeth M Droge-Young; Kirstin S Berben; William F Collins; John M Belote; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Inbreeding depression does not increase after exposure to a stressful environment: a test using compensatory growth.

Authors:  Regina Vega-Trejo; Megan L Head; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.