Literature DB >> 15890494

Cortical correlates of false expectations during pain intensity judgments--a possible manifestation of placebo/nocebo cognitions.

Jürgen Lorenz1, Michael Hauck, Robert C Paur, Yoko Nakamura, Roger Zimmermann, Burkhart Bromm, Andreas K Engel.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of expectation on intensity ratings and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and electrical potentials following painful infrared laser stimuli in six healthy subjects. The stimulus series contained trials preceded by different auditory cues which either contained valid, invalid or no information about the upcoming laser intensity. High and low intensities occurred equally probable across cue types. High intensity stimuli induced greater pain than low intensity across all cue types. Furthermore, laser intensity significantly interacted with cue validity: high intensity stimuli were perceived less painful and low intensity stimuli more painful following invalid compared to valid cues. The amplitude of the evoked magnetic field localized within the contralateral secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) at about 165 ms after laser stimuli varied also both with stimulus intensity and cue validity. The evoked electric potential peaked at about 300 ms after laser stimuli and yielded a single dipole source within a region encompassing the caudal anterior cingulate cortex and posterior cingulate cortex. Its amplitude also varied with stimulus intensity, but failed to show any cue validity effects. This result suggests a priming of early cortical nociceptive sensitivity by cues signaling pain severity. A possible contribution of the SII cortex to the manifestation of nocebo/placebo cognitions is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890494     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2005.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Immun        ISSN: 0889-1591            Impact factor:   7.217


  38 in total

1.  Getting the pain you expect: mechanisms of placebo, nocebo and reappraisal effects in humans.

Authors:  Irene Tracey
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  The placebo effect: From concepts to genes.

Authors:  B Colagiuri; L A Schenk; M D Kessler; S G Dorsey; L Colloca
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Placebo effects in laser-evoked pain potentials.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Dagfinn Matre; Kenneth L Casey
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 7.217

4.  [Laser acupuncture for chronic back pain. A double-blind clinical study].

Authors:  M Ruth; M Weber; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  Pain and suicidality: insights from reward and addiction neuroscience.

Authors:  Igor Elman; David Borsook; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  Placebo expectations and the detection of somatic information.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Justin A Wellman; Stephanie L Fowler; Heather M Rasinski; Suzanne G Helfer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-11-03

Review 7.  Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Anna von Lilienfeld-Toal; Imis Dogan; Franziska Schreiber; Stefan G Hofmann; Arthur J Barsky; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  How Is Pain Influenced by Cognition? Neuroimaging Weighs In.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-01

9.  Predicting individual differences in placebo analgesia: contributions of brain activity during anticipation and pain experience.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas; Lauren A Leotti; James K Rilling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Pain and the context.

Authors:  Elisa Carlino; Elisa Frisaldi; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 20.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.