Literature DB >> 20872019

Analysis of standard multiport versus single-site access for laparoscopic skills training.

Daniel R Cox1, Wenjing Zeng, Margaret M Frisella, L Michael Brunt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-site-access (SSA) laparoscopy is more challenging to perform than multiport (MP) laparoscopy. This study examined the effect of MP versus SSA skills training on laparoscopic performance using surgically naive medical students.
METHODS: For the study, 40 medical students at the end of their first year were randomized into two groups. Both groups were trained in four basic laparoscopic drills (peg, rope, bean drop, pattern cutting) using a standard MP setup (group 1) and an SSA approach (group 2). The time and number of repetitions required to attain proficiency were recorded. Each group then crossed over to the alternate approach and repeated the sequence. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and statistical analysis was performed using the two-tailed, unpaired t test.
RESULTS: The total times required to attain proficiency for the SSA and MP approaches were not significantly different between the MP-trained group (234.0 ± 114.9 min) and the SSA-trained group (216.4 ± 106.5 min) (p = 0.67). The MP-trained group required less time to reach proficiency on the standard MP setup than the group using the SSA approach (119.1 ± 69.7 vs. 178.0 ± 93.4 min; p = 0.058) and significantly fewer repetitions (77.6 ± 42.6 vs. 118.8 ± 54.3; p = 0.027). The SSA-trained group required significantly less time to reach proficiency on the MP setup than the standard MP-trained group (38.4 ± 29.4 vs. 119.1 ± 69.7 min; p = 0.0013) and needed only a mean of 26.9 repetitions. When the standard MP trainees crossed over to the SSA setup, they required significantly less time to reach proficiency with the SSA approach than the SSA-trained group (114.8 ± 50.5 vs. 178.0 ± 93.4 min; p = 0.026) but required more repetitions than with the MP approach (86.2 ± 35.2 vs. 77.6 ± 42.6; nonsignificant difference).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic SSA skills training results in longer times and more repetitions to achieve proficiency than MP training, but the skills acquired transfer well to the MP approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20872019      PMCID: PMC4443802          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1349-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

1.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Single incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases.

Authors:  Umut Barbaros; Ahmet Dinççağ
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Single incision total extraperitoneal (one SITE) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a single access port device.

Authors:  B P Jacob; W Tong; M Reiner; A Vine; L B Katz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  The new ACS/APDS Skills Curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room.

Authors:  Daniel J Scott; Gary L Dunnington
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Navarra; E Pozza; S Occhionorelli; P Carcoforo; I Donini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-02

7.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  Arthur Rawlings; Steven E Hodgett; Brent D Matthews; Steven M Strasberg; Mary Quasebarth; L Michael Brunt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.

Authors:  David Canes; Andre Berger; Monish Aron; Ricardo Brandina; David A Goldfarb; Daniel Shoskes; Mihir M Desai; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Byong Chang Jeong; Yong Hyun Park; Deok Hyun Han; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Johnathan Slone; Kevin Reavis
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.734

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does previous laparoscopic experience improve ability to perform single-incision laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  Trystan Lewis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Richard Kwasnicki; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Laparoscopic single port surgery : Is structured training necessary?].

Authors:  K Krajinovic; C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between single-site access (SSA) devices and an independent-port SSA approach.

Authors:  Matthew R Schill; J Esteban Varela; Margaret M Frisella; L Michael Brunt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparative Performance in Single-Port Versus Multiport Minimally Invasive Surgery, and Small Versus Large Operative Working Spaces: A Preclinical Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Carlo A Seneci; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Thomas P Cundy; Dipankar Nandi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  The influence of prior laparoscopic experience on learning laparoendoscopic single site surgery: a prospective comparative preliminary study using cystorraphy in a live porcine model.

Authors:  U-Syn Ha; Kyu Won Lee; Sun Wook Kim; Seung Hyun Jeon; Tae Gyun Kwon; Hyung Keun Park; Sung-Hoo Hong
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.