Literature DB >> 20869716

Modeling nonlinear errors in surface electromyography due to baseline noise: a new methodology.

Laura Frey Law1, Chandramouli Krishnan, Keith Avin.   

Abstract

The surface electromyographic (EMG) signal is often contaminated by some degree of baseline noise. It is customary for scientists to subtract baseline noise from the measured EMG signal prior to further analyses based on the assumption that baseline noise adds linearly to the observed EMG signal. The stochastic nature of both the baseline and EMG signal, however, may invalidate this assumption. Alternately, "true" EMG signals may be either minimally or nonlinearly affected by baseline noise. This information is particularly relevant at low contraction intensities when signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) may be lowest. Thus, the purpose of this simulation study was to investigate the influence of varying levels of baseline noise (approximately 2-40% maximum EMG amplitude) on mean EMG burst amplitude and to assess the best means to account for signal noise. The simulations indicated baseline noise had minimal effects on mean EMG activity for maximum contractions, but increased nonlinearly with increasing noise levels and decreasing signal amplitudes. Thus, the simple baseline noise subtraction resulted in substantial error when estimating mean activity during low intensity EMG bursts. Conversely, correcting EMG signal as a nonlinear function of both baseline and measured signal amplitude provided highly accurate estimates of EMG amplitude. This novel nonlinear error modeling approach has potential implications for EMG signal processing, particularly when assessing co-activation of antagonist muscles or small amplitude contractions where the SNR can be low.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20869716      PMCID: PMC3003745          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  15 in total

Review 1.  Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography.

Authors:  E A Clancy; E L Morin; R Merletti
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Investigation into the origin of the noise of surface electrodes.

Authors:  E Huigen; A Peper; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The effects of the antagonist muscle force on intersegmental loading during isokinetic efforts of the knee extensors.

Authors:  E Kellis; V Baltzopoulos
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Error associated with antagonist muscle activity in isometric knee strength testing.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effects of surface EMG rectification on power and coherence analyses: an EEG and MEG study.

Authors:  Bing Yao; Stephen Salenius; Guang H Yue; Robert W Brown; Jing Z Liu
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Hamstring antagonist moment estimation using clinically applicable models: Muscle dependency and synergy effects.

Authors:  Eleftherios Kellis; Athanasios Katis
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Sex differences in quadriceps and hamstrings EMG-moment relationships.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination.

Authors:  Carlo J De Luca; L Donald Gilmore; Mikhail Kuznetsov; Serge H Roy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Voltage fluctuations of metal-electrolyte interfaces in electrophysiology.

Authors:  A H Flasterstein
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1966-11

10.  Changes in intra-abdominal pressure during postural and respiratory activation of the human diaphragm.

Authors:  P W Hodges; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2000-09
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  How to improve the muscle synergy analysis methodology?

Authors:  Nicolas A Turpin; Stéphane Uriac; Georges Dalleau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A New Projected Active Set Conjugate Gradient Approach for Taylor-Type Model Predictive Control: Application to Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robots With Passive and Active Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Tian Shi; Yantao Tian; Zhongbo Sun; Bangcheng Zhang; Zaixiang Pang; Junzhi Yu; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  The association between antagonist hamstring coactivation and episodes of knee joint shifting and buckling.

Authors:  N A Segal; M C Nevitt; R D Welborn; U-S D T Nguyen; J Niu; C E Lewis; D T Felson; L Frey-Law
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Muscle coactivation: a generalized or localized motor control strategy?

Authors:  Laura A Frey-Law; Keith G Avin
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.