Literature DB >> 17055745

Hamstring antagonist moment estimation using clinically applicable models: Muscle dependency and synergy effects.

Eleftherios Kellis1, Athanasios Katis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether prediction of antagonist moment (M(flx)) of the hamstrings using clinically applicable models depends on the muscles examined. Nine healthy males performed maximal isometric knee extension and flexion contractions at 0 degrees , 45 degrees and 90 degrees angles. Calibration knee flexion efforts were also performed at different levels of intensity. The resulting electromyographic (EMG) - moment curves were fitted using polynomial equations which were then used to estimate M(flx) from the antagonist EMG. Analysis of variance designs showed that the M(flx) predicted using the biceps femoris EMG was not significantly different compared with those predicted using the semitendinosus EMG data (p>0.05). Further, prediction of M(flx) using the EMG of both muscles or a combination of EMGs and architectural properties reduced estimation error but did not provide significantly different predicted values compared with the simpler single-muscle EMG - moment models (p<0.05). It appears that M(flx) prediction using the present EMG - moment model is not muscle specific. Prediction using models which combine EMG data and anatomic parameters of the hamstring muscle components yielded more accurate estimates and therefore their use to examine co-contraction levels is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17055745     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  9 in total

1.  Modeling nonlinear errors in surface electromyography due to baseline noise: a new methodology.

Authors:  Laura Frey Law; Chandramouli Krishnan; Keith Avin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Error associated with antagonist muscle activity in isometric knee strength testing.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Hamstrings activity during knee extensor strength testing: effects of burst superimposition.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2008

4.  Is co-contraction responsible for the decline in maximal knee joint torque in older males?

Authors:  Maxime Billot; Julien Duclay; Emilie M Simoneau-Buessinger; Yves Ballay; Alain Martin
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-01-21

5.  Anatomical and neuromuscular variables strongly predict maximum knee extension torque in healthy men.

Authors:  J Trezise; N Collier; A J Blazevich
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  A practical strategy for sEMG-based knee joint moment estimation during gait and its validation in individuals with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Suncheol Kwon; Hyung-Soon Park; Christopher J Stanley; Jung Kim; Jonghyun Kim; Diane L Damiano
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Factors explaining chronic knee extensor strength deficits after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Effects of hip flexion angle on surface electromyographic activity of the biceps femoris and semitendinosus during isokinetic knee flexion.

Authors:  Eleftherios Kellis; Nikiforos Galanis; Nikolaos Kofotolis; Anastasia Hatzi
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-09-18

Review 9.  Hamstrings force-length relationships and their implications for angle-specific joint torques: a narrative review.

Authors:  Eleftherios Kellis; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.