Literature DB >> 20869268

Validity of selected Patient Safety Indicators: opportunities and concerns.

Haytham M A Kaafarani1, Ann M Borzecki, Kamal M F Itani, Susan Loveland, Hillary J Mull, Kathleen Hickson, Sally Macdonald, Marlena Shin, Amy K Rosen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) recently designed the Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) to detect potential safety-related adverse events. The National Quality Forum has endorsed several of these ICD-9-CM-based indicators as quality-of-care measures. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of 3 surgical PSIs: postoperative pulmonary embolus and deep vein thrombosis (pPE/DVT), iatrogenic pneumothorax (iPTX), and accidental puncture and laceration (APL). STUDY
DESIGN: We applied the AHRQ PSI software (v.3.1a) to fiscal year 2003 to 2007 Veterans Health Administration (VA) administrative data to identify (flag) patients suspected of having a pPE/DVT, iPTX, or APL. Two trained nurse abstractors reviewed a sample of 336 flagged medical records (112 records per PSI) using a standardized instrument. Inter-rater reliability was assessed.
RESULTS: Of 2,343,088 admissions, 6,080 were flagged for pPE/DVT (0.26%), 1,402 for iPTX (0.06%), and 7,203 for APL (0.31%). For pPE/DVT, the PPV was 43% (95% CI, 34% to 53%); 21% of cases had inaccurate coding (eg, arterial not venous thrombosis); and 36% featured thromboembolism present on admission or preoperatively. For iPTX, the PPV was 73% (95% CI, 64% to 81%); 18% had inaccurate coding (eg, spontaneous pneumothorax), and 9% were pneumothoraces present on admission. For APL, the PPV was 85% (95% CI, 77% to 91%); 10% of cases had coding inaccuracies and 5% indicated injuries present on admission. However, 27% of true APLs were minor injuries requiring no surgical repair (eg, small serosal bowel tear). Inter-rater reliability was >90% for all 3 PSIs.
CONCLUSIONS: Until coding revisions are implemented, these PSIs, especially pPE/DVT, should be used primarily for screening and case-finding. Their utility for public reporting and pay-for-performance needs to be reassessed. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20869268     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  23 in total

1.  Predictors of Short-Term Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Rajesh Ramanathan; Travis Mason; Luke G Wolfe; Brian J Kaplan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard E Nelson; Kwame A Nyarko; Lisa C Richardson; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Improving and sustaining a reduction in iatrogenic pneumothorax through a multifaceted quality-improvement approach.

Authors:  Lisa Shieh; Minjoung Go; Daniel Gessner; Jonathan H Chen; Joseph Hopkins; Paul Maggio
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 4.  [The validity of routine data on quality assurance: A qualitative systematic review].

Authors:  E Hanisch; T F Weigel; A Buia; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Determinants of adverse events in vascular surgery.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Kathryn M McDonald; John M Morton; Ronald L Dalman; Fritz R Bech
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Adverse outcomes in hip arthroplasty: long-term trends.

Authors:  Brian R Wolf; Xin Lu; Yue Li; John J Callaghan; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Using estimated true safety event rates versus flagged safety event rates: does it change hospital profiling and payment?

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Qi Chen; Ann M Borzecki; Marlena Shin; Kamal M F Itani; Michael Shwartz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Navigating a ship with a broken compass: evaluating standard algorithms to measure patient safety.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hefner; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Barbara Barash; Tina Latimer; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Kerrin Palazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; David C Chang; Sonia L Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Impact of including readmissions for qualifying events in the patient safety indicators.

Authors:  Sheryl M Davies; Olga Saynina; Laurence C Baker; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.