Literature DB >> 22425449

Determinants of adverse events in vascular surgery.

Tina Hernandez-Boussard1, Kathryn M McDonald, John M Morton, Ronald L Dalman, Fritz R Bech.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a national priority. Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) monitor potential adverse events during hospital stays. Surgical specialty PSI benchmarks do not exist, and are needed to account for differences in the range of procedures performed, reasons for the procedure, and differences in patient characteristics. A comprehensive profile of adverse events in vascular surgery was created. STUDY
DESIGN: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for 8 vascular procedures using ICD-9-CM codes from 2005 to 2009. Factors associated with PSI development were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 1,412,703 patients underwent a vascular procedure and a PSI developed in 5.2%. PSIs were more frequent in female, nonwhite patients with public payers (p < 0.01). Patients at mid and low-volume hospitals had greater odds of developing a PSI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.23 and OR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.53-1.87). Amputations had highest PSI risk-adjusted rate and carotid endarterectomy and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair had lower risk-adjusted rate (p < 0.0001). PSI risk-adjusted rate increased linearly by severity of patient indication: claudicants (OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.35-0.46), rest pain patients (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90), ulcer (OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34), and gangrene patients (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.66-2.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient safety events in vascular surgery were high and varied by procedure, with amputations and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair having considerably more potential adverse events. PSIs were associated with black race, public payer, and procedure indication. It is important to note the overall higher rates of PSIs occurring in vascular patients and to adjust benchmarks for this surgical specialty appropriately.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425449      PMCID: PMC4890555          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.01.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  20 in total

1.  Evaluating preventable adverse safety events after elective lower extremity procedures.

Authors:  Todd R Vogel; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Paul B Haser; Alan M Graham
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Methodology for antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy guideline development: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Deborah Cook; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Racial disparity in surgical complications in New York State.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks; Sean Meldrum; Steven Barnett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Identifying complications of care using administrative data.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; J Daley; T Heeren; S M Foley; E S Fisher; C Duncan; J S Hughes; G A Coffman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Relationship between patient safety and hospital surgical volume.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; John R Downey; Kathryn McDonald; John M Morton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery.

Authors:  Peter L Schilling; Justin B Dimick; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Clinical validation of the AHRQ postoperative venous thromboembolism patient safety indicator.

Authors:  Katherine E Henderson; Angela j Recktenwald; Richard M Reichley; Thomas C Bailey; Brian M Waterman; Rebecca L Diekemper; Patricia E Storey; Belinda K Ireland; Wm Claiborne Dunagan
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2009-07

8.  How often are potential patient safety events present on admission?

Authors:  Robert L Houchens; Anne Elixhauser; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-03

9.  Do the AHRQ patient safety indicators flag conditions that are present at the time of hospital admission?

Authors:  Vinita Bahl; Maureen A Thompson; Tsui-Ying Kau; Hsou Mei Hu; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after different elective or urgent surgical procedures.

Authors:  Richard H White; Hong Zhou; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  5 in total

1.  The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Kerrin Palazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; David C Chang; Sonia L Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of Patient Safety Indicators on readmission after abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan Bath; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  J Vasc Nurs       Date:  2018-10-02

3.  Patient safety in plastic surgery: identifying areas for quality improvement efforts.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Kathryn M McDonald; Kim F Rhoads; Catherine M Curtin
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Hospitalization rates and post-operative mortality for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Italy over the period 2000-2011.

Authors:  Luigi Sensi; Dario Tedesco; Stefano Mimmi; Paola Rucci; Emilio Pisano; Luciano Pedrini; Kathryn M McDonald; Maria Pia Fantini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hemodialysis-associated endovascular device infection.

Authors:  Edward A Ross; Jennifer L Paugh-Miller; Robert W Nappo
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2014-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.