Literature DB >> 22810410

Adverse outcomes in hip arthroplasty: long-term trends.

Brian R Wolf1, Xin Lu, Yue Li, John J Callaghan, Peter Cram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure, but little is known about longitudinal trends in associated adverse outcomes. Our objective was to describe long-term trends in demographics, comorbidities, and adverse outcomes for older patients who underwent primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: We identified a retrospective, observational cohort of 1,405,379 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty and 337,874 who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty between 1991 and 2008. The primary outcome was a composite representing the occurrence of one or more of the following adverse outcomes during the index admission or during readmission within ninety days after discharge: death, hemorrhage, infection, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, deep venous thrombosis, and myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included each of these outcomes assessed individually.
RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2008, the mean age and the mean comorbidity burden increased for all total hip arthroplasty patients. The length of hospital stay after primary and revision total hip arthroplasty declined by approximately 50% over the study period. However, the rate of readmission for any cause has recently increased and has surpassed 10% for primary total hip arthroplasty and 20% for revision total hip arthroplasty. The composite rate of adverse outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty declined from 4% to 3.4% over the study period, whereas the composite adverse outcome rate after revision total hip arthroplasty slowly increased from 7% to 10.9%. We observed a steady decline in the rates of most individual adverse outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty over the majority of the study period. Many of these rates stabilized or began to increase slightly near the end of the study period. In contrast, an increase in the rates of many adverse outcomes was observed in the revision total hip arthroplasty population even after accounting for changes in patient complexity. Postoperative hemorrhage has gradually increased after both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing primary and revision total hip arthroplasty are becoming more complex. Despite this increasing complexity, patient outcomes for primary total hip arthroplasty improved markedly before stabilizing in recent years. In contrast, patient outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty have gradually worsened, likely reflecting the increase in the medical comorbidities and surgical complexity of these patients. Length of hospital stay has demonstrated a substantial decline, which has recently been coupled with an increased readmission rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22810410      PMCID: PMC3392201          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  48 in total

1.  Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision.

Authors:  Steven T Woolson; Christopher S Mow; Jose Fernando Syquia; John V Lannin; David J Schurman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. A series of three cases.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; J Bohannon Mason
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Fionna Mowat; Kevin Ong; Nathan Chan; Edmund Lau; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Using Medicare claims for outcomes research.

Authors:  J B Mitchell; T Bubolz; J E Paul; C L Pashos; J J Escarce; L H Muhlbaier; J M Wiesman; W W Young; R S Epstein; J C Javitt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; S M Foley; J Daley; J Hughes; E S Fisher; T Heeren
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8,467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999.

Authors:  Anna-Katriina Himanen; Eero Belt; Juha Nevalainen; Martti Hämäläinen; Matti U K Lehto
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery.

Authors:  F Birrell; O Johnell; A Silman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Early failures of total hip replacement: effect of surgeon volume.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Jane Barrett; Nizar N Mahomed; John A Baron; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-04

10.  Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Jane Barrett; Nizar N Mahomed; John A Baron; R John Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  45 in total

1.  Myocardial ischaemia after hip and knee arthroplasty: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Anne Ruth Bass; Tomás Rodriguez; Gina Hyun; Francisco Gerardo Santiago; Jacqueline Ilji Kim; Scott Christopher Woller; Brian Foster Gage
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Are There Modifiable Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a US Healthcare System?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Jasvinder A Singh; Rebecca Love; Stefano A Bini; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Impact of body mass index on risk of acute kidney injury and mortality in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  A B Pedersen; H Gammelager; J Kahlert; H T Sørensen; C F Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Short-term complications have more effect on cost-effectiveness of THA than implant longevity.

Authors:  David W Shearer; Jiwon Youm; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in France?

Authors:  Christian Delaunay; Moussa Hamadouche; Julien Girard; Alain Duhamel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Disparities in Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: an Observational Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Clinical Registry.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Gillian Hawker; John Matelski; Bheeshma Ravi; Andrew Pugely; Rajiv Gandhi; Timothy Jackson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-03-24

Review 7.  Current Approaches in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Gülen Güler; Şebnem Atıcı; Ercan Kurt; Saffet Karaca; Aysun Yılmazlar
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-02-16

8.  Polymeric nanofiber coating with tunable combinatorial antibiotic delivery prevents biofilm-associated infection in vivo.

Authors:  Alyssa G Ashbaugh; Xuesong Jiang; Jesse Zheng; Andrew S Tsai; Woo-Shin Kim; John M Thompson; Robert J Miller; Jonathan H Shahbazian; Yu Wang; Carly A Dillen; Alvaro A Ordonez; Yong S Chang; Sanjay K Jain; Lynne C Jones; Robert S Sterling; Hai-Quan Mao; Lloyd S Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Accelerating sequences in the presence of metal by exploiting the spatial distribution of off-resonance.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; Nathan S Artz; Kevin M Koch; Alexey Samsonov; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Readmission rates in the state of Florida: a reflection of quality?

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Jesus M Villa; David A Iacobelli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.