BACKGROUND: Structures in intensive care medicine comprise human as well as material resources, organization, and management and may be related to processes thereby affecting patients' outcomes. Utilizing a unique data base we evaluated structures of German intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: The study was carried out by the German Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet). Data were prospectively collected on a cross-sectional basis in a representative random sample of German hospitals utilizing a questionnaire. Structures were related to ICU outcome of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. The sample was subdivided in 5 strata according to hospital size. RESULTS: A total of 454 ICUs cared for 3877 patients including 415 patients (11%) with severe sepsis or septic shock. The mean number of beds per ICU was 10.4, the ratio of ICU to hospital beds 1:27, both with significant differences depending on hospital size. 81% of the ICUs provided around the clock physician presence (range: 66-98% across hospital strata, p < 0.001). Shift-wise, one nurse was responsible for a mean number of 2.7 patients (morning 1:2.3, afternoon 1:2.6, night 1:3.3 patients) with significant variation according to hospital size (smaller hospitals 1:2.9, university hospitals 1:2.1, p < 0.001). More than half of all German ICUs are lead by anesthesiologists. Neither physician nor nurse staffing was associated with mortality in the subset of patients with sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: In a representative, nationwide sample of German ICUs key elements of structures varied considerably with respect to hospital size. This has to be considered when proposing standards, reimbursement strategies, or quality assessment.
BACKGROUND: Structures in intensive care medicine comprise human as well as material resources, organization, and management and may be related to processes thereby affecting patients' outcomes. Utilizing a unique data base we evaluated structures of German intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: The study was carried out by the German Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet). Data were prospectively collected on a cross-sectional basis in a representative random sample of German hospitals utilizing a questionnaire. Structures were related to ICU outcome of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. The sample was subdivided in 5 strata according to hospital size. RESULTS: A total of 454 ICUs cared for 3877 patients including 415 patients (11%) with severe sepsis or septic shock. The mean number of beds per ICU was 10.4, the ratio of ICU to hospital beds 1:27, both with significant differences depending on hospital size. 81% of the ICUs provided around the clock physician presence (range: 66-98% across hospital strata, p < 0.001). Shift-wise, one nurse was responsible for a mean number of 2.7 patients (morning 1:2.3, afternoon 1:2.6, night 1:3.3 patients) with significant variation according to hospital size (smaller hospitals 1:2.9, university hospitals 1:2.1, p < 0.001). More than half of all German ICUs are lead by anesthesiologists. Neither physician nor nurse staffing was associated with mortality in the subset of patients with sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: In a representative, nationwide sample of German ICUs key elements of structures varied considerably with respect to hospital size. This has to be considered when proposing standards, reimbursement strategies, or quality assessment.
Authors: Jeremy M Kahn; Christopher H Goss; Patrick J Heagerty; Andrew A Kramer; Chelsea R O'Brien; Gordon D Rubenfeld Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christoph Engel; Frank M Brunkhorst; Hans-Georg Bone; Reinhard Brunkhorst; Herwig Gerlach; Stefan Grond; Matthias Gruendling; Guenter Huhle; Ulrich Jaschinski; Stefan John; Konstantin Mayer; Michael Oppert; Derk Olthoff; Michael Quintel; Max Ragaller; Rolf Rossaint; Frank Stuber; Norbert Weiler; Tobias Welte; Holger Bogatsch; Christiane Hartog; Markus Loeffler; Konrad Reinhart Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-02-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Hannah Wunsch; Derek C Angus; David A Harrison; Olivier Collange; Robert Fowler; Eric A J Hoste; Nicolette F de Keizer; Alexander Kersten; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Alberto Sandiumenge; Kathryn M Rowan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marilyn T Haupt; Carolyn E Bekes; Richard J Brilli; Linda C Carl; Anthony W Gray; Michael S Jastremski; Douglas F Naylor; Maria Rudis PharmD; Antoinette Spevetz Md; Suzanne K Wedel; Mathilda Horst Md Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: D C Richter; A Heininger; T Brenner; M Hochreiter; M Bernhard; J Briegel; S Dubler; B Grabein; A Hecker; W A Kruger; K Mayer; M W Pletz; D Storzinger; N Pinder; T Hoppe-Tichy; S Weiterer; S Zimmermann; A Brinkmann; M A Weigand; C Lichtenstern Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: D C Richter; A Heininger; T Brenner; M Hochreiter; M Bernhard; J Briegel; S Dubler; B Grabein; A Hecker; W A Krüger; K Mayer; M W Pletz; D Störzinger; N Pinder; T Hoppe-Tichy; S Weiterer; S Zimmermann; A Brinkmann; M A Weigand; Christoph Lichtenstern Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Anna Lee; Yip Sing Leo Cheung; Gavin Matthew Joynt; Czarina Chi Hung Leung; Wai-Tat Wong; Charles David Gomersall Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Christine Schlömmer; Gregor A Schittek; Jens Meier; Walter Hasibeder; Andreas Valentin; Martin W Dünser Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 2.275