Literature DB >> 20858918

Characterization of single-core magnetite nanoparticles for magnetic imaging by SQUID relaxometry.

Natalie L Adolphi1, Dale L Huber, Howard C Bryant, Todd C Monson, Danielle L Fegan, Jitkang Lim, Jason E Trujillo, Trace E Tessier, Debbie M Lovato, Kimberly S Butler, Paula P Provencio, Helen J Hathaway, Sara A Majetich, Richard S Larson, Edward R Flynn.   

Abstract

Optimizing the sensitivity of SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device) relaxometry for detecting cell-targeted magnetic nanoparticles for in vivo diagnostics requires nanoparticles with a narrow particle size distribution to ensure that the Néel relaxation times fall within the measurement timescale (50 ms-2 s, in this work). To determine the optimum particle size, single-core magnetite nanoparticles (with nominal average diameters 20, 25, 30 and 35 nm) were characterized by SQUID relaxometry, transmission electron microscopy, SQUID susceptometry, dynamic light scattering and zeta potential analysis. The SQUID relaxometry signal (detected magnetic moment/kg) from both the 25 nm and 30 nm particles was an improvement over previously studied multi-core particles. However, the detected moments were an order of magnitude lower than predicted based on a simple model that takes into account the measured size distributions (but neglects dipolar interactions and polydispersity of the anisotropy energy density), indicating that improved control of several different nanoparticle properties (size, shape and coating thickness) will be required to achieve the highest detection sensitivity. Antibody conjugation and cell incubation experiments show that single-core particles enable a higher detected moment per cell, but also demonstrate the need for improved surface treatments to mitigate aggregation and improve specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20858918      PMCID: PMC3883308          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/19/023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  Ultrasensitive magnetic biosensor for homogeneous immunoassay.

Authors:  Y R Chemla; H L Grossman; Y Poon; R McDermott; R Stevens; M D Alper; J Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Two Mechanisms and a Scaling Relation for Dynamics in Ferrofluids.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-07-08       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Influence of dipolar interaction on magnetic properties of ultrafine ferromagnetic particles

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-01-03       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Superparamagnetic relaxation of weakly interacting particles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-05-16       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  A biomagnetic system for in vivo cancer imaging.

Authors:  E R Flynn; H C Bryant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Determination of energy barrier distributions of magnetic nanoparticles by temperature dependent magnetorelaxometry.

Authors:  E Romanus; D V Berkov; S Prass; C Groß; W Weitschies; P Weber
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.874

7.  Characterization of magnetite nanoparticles for SQUID-relaxometry and magnetic needle biopsy.

Authors:  Natalie L Adolphi; Dale L Huber; Jason E Jaetao; Howard C Bryant; Debbie M Lovato; Danielle L Fegan; Eugene L Venturini; Todd C Monson; Trace E Tessier; Helen J Hathaway; Christian Bergemann; Richard S Larson; Edward R Flynn
Journal:  J Magn Magn Mater       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.993

8.  Development of a remanence measurement-based SQUID system with in-depth resolution for nanoparticle imaging.

Authors:  Song Ge; Xiangyang Shi; James R Baker; Mark M Banaszak Holl; Bradford G Orr
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Enhanced leukemia cell detection using a novel magnetic needle and nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jason E Jaetao; Kimberly S Butler; Natalie L Adolphi; Debbie M Lovato; Howard C Bryant; Ian Rabinowitz; Stuart S Winter; Trace E Tessier; Helen J Hathaway; Christian Bergemann; Edward R Flynn; Richard S Larson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Optimizing magnetic nanoparticle design for nanothermotherapy.

Authors:  Florence Gazeau; Michael Lévy; Claire Wilhelm
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.307

View more
  12 in total

1.  Magnetic Relaxometry with an Atomic Magnetometer and SQUID Sensors on Targeted Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Cort Johnson; Natalie L Adolphi; Kimberly L Butler; Lovato Debbie M; Richard Larson; Peter D D Schwindt; Edward R Flynn
Journal:  J Magn Magn Mater       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.993

2.  Imaging of Her2-targeted magnetic nanoparticles for breast cancer detection: comparison of SQUID-detected magnetic relaxometry and MRI.

Authors:  Natalie L Adolphi; Kimberly S Butler; Debbie M Lovato; T E Tessier; Jason E Trujillo; Helen J Hathaway; Danielle L Fegan; Todd C Monson; Tyler E Stevens; Dale L Huber; Jaivijay Ramu; Michelle L Milne; Stephen A Altobelli; Howard C Bryant; Richard S Larson; Edward R Flynn
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Pulsed Excitation in Magnetic Particle Imaging.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel Hensley; Jie Ma; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Bo Zheng; Patrick Goodwill; Steven Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Development of a magnetic nanoparticle susceptibility magnitude imaging array.

Authors:  Bradley W Ficko; Priyanka M Nadar; P Jack Hoopes; Solomon G Diamond
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Spectroscopic AC Susceptibility Imaging (sASI) of Magnetic Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Bradley W Ficko; Priyanka M Nadar; Solomon G Diamond
Journal:  J Magn Magn Mater       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.993

6.  Magnetic particle detection (MPD) for in-vitro dosimetry.

Authors:  Kevin R Minard; Matthew H Littke; Wei Wang; Yijia Xiong; Justin G Teeguarden; Brian D Thrall
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 10.618

7.  Detection of breast cancer cells using targeted magnetic nanoparticles and ultra-sensitive magnetic field sensors.

Authors:  Helen J Hathaway; Kimberly S Butler; Natalie L Adolphi; Debbie M Lovato; Robert Belfon; Danielle Fegan; Todd C Monson; Jason E Trujillo; Trace E Tessier; Howard C Bryant; Dale L Huber; Richard S Larson; Edward R Flynn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Characterization of magnetic nanoparticle by dynamic light scattering.

Authors:  Jitkang Lim; Swee Pin Yeap; Hui Xin Che; Siew Chun Low
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.703

Review 9.  Nanopharmaceuticals (part 2): products in the pipeline.

Authors:  Volkmar Weissig; Diana Guzman-Villanueva
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-02-11

10.  Quantification of nanoparticle dose and vesicular inheritance in proliferating cells.

Authors:  Huw D Summers; Martyn R Brown; Mark D Holton; James A Tonkin; Nicole Hondow; Andrew P Brown; Rik Brydson; Paul Rees
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.