Literature DB >> 20858361

Noise in a laboratory animal facility from the human and mouse perspectives.

Randall P Reynolds1, Will L Kinard, Jesse J Degraff, Ned Leverage, John N Norton.   

Abstract

The current study was performed to understand the level of sound produced by ventilated racks, animal transfer stations, and construction equipment that mice in ventilated cages hear relative to what humans would hear in the same environment. Although the ventilated rack and animal transfer station both produced sound pressure levels above the ambient level within the human hearing range, the sound pressure levels within the mouse hearing range did not increase above ambient noise from either noise source. When various types of construction equipment were used 3 ft from the ventilated rack, the sound pressure level within the mouse hearing range was increased but to a lesser degree for each implement than were the sound pressure levels within the human hearing range. At more distant locations within the animal facility, sound pressure levels from the large jackhammer within the mouse hearing range decreased much more rapidly than did those in the human hearing range, indicating that less of the sound is perceived by mice than by humans. The relatively high proportion of low-frequency sound produced by the shot blaster, used without the metal shot that it normally uses to clean concrete, increased the sound pressure level above the ambient level for humans but did not increase sound pressure levels above ambient noise for mice at locations greater than 3 ft from inside of the cage, where sound was measured. This study demonstrates that sound clearly audible to humans in the animal facility may be perceived to a lesser degree or not at all by mice, because of the frequency content of the sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20858361      PMCID: PMC2949429     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  9 in total

1.  Warning! Nearby construction can profoundly affect your experiments.

Authors:  M F Dallman; S F Akana; M E Bell; S Bhatnagar; S Choi; A Chu; F Gomez; K Laugero; L Soriano; V Viau
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Hearing in laboratory animals: strain differences and nonauditory effects of noise.

Authors:  Jeremy G Turner; Jennifer L Parrish; Larry F Hughes; Linda A Toth; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 3.  Hearing ranges of laboratory animals.

Authors:  Henry E Heffner; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Noise in animal facilities: why it matters.

Authors:  Jeremy G Turner; Carol A Bauer; Leonard P Rybak
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Environmental ultrasound in laboratories and animal houses: a possible cause for concern in the welfare and use of laboratory animals.

Authors:  G D Sales; K J Wilson; K E Spencer; S R Milligan
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  The effects of noise level and elevated ambient temperatures upon selected reproductive traits in female Swiss-Webster mice.

Authors:  H B Zakem; C W Alliston
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1974-06

7.  Sound levels in rooms housing laboratory animals: an uncontrolled daily variable.

Authors:  S R Milligan; G D Sales; K Khirnykh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1993-06

8.  Construction noise decreases reproductive efficiency in mice.

Authors:  Skye Rasmussen; Gary Glickman; Rada Norinsky; Fred W Quimby; Ravi J Tolwani
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Embryotoxicity of broadband high-frequency noise in the CD-1 mouse.

Authors:  P S Nawrot; R O Cook; C W Hamm
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug
  9 in total
  21 in total

1.  Comparative vibration levels perceived among species in a laboratory animal facility.

Authors:  John N Norton; Will L Kinard; Randall P Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Mortality and morbidity in African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) associated with construction noise and vibrations.

Authors:  Stephen A Felt; Andrea M Cowan; Richard Luong; Sherril L Green
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Assessing ototoxicity due to chronic lead and cadmium intake with and without noise exposure in the mature mouse.

Authors:  Krystin Carlson; Jochen Schacht; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2018-09-21

4.  Noise and Vibration in the Vivarium: Recommendations for Developing a Measurement Plan.

Authors:  Jeremy G Turner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Effect of Nearby Construction Activity on Endothelial Function, Sensitivity to Nitric Oxide, and Potassium Channel Activity in the Middle Cerebral Arteries of Rats.

Authors:  Maia N Terashvili; Kaleigh N Kozak; Debebe Gebremedhin; Linda A Allen; Alison L Gifford; Kenneth P Allen; Joseph D Thulin; Julian H Lombard
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  An assessment of ambient noise and other environmental variables in a nonhuman primate housing facility.

Authors:  Alexander R McLeod; Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 9.667

7.  Mutation of the ATP-gated P2X(2) receptor leads to progressive hearing loss and increased susceptibility to noise.

Authors:  Denise Yan; Yan Zhu; Tom Walsh; Dinghua Xie; Huijun Yuan; Asli Sirmaci; Taro Fujikawa; Ann Chi Yan Wong; Tze L Loh; Lilin Du; M'hamed Grati; Srdjan M Vlajkovic; Susan Blanton; Allen F Ryan; Zheng-Yi Chen; Peter R Thorne; Bechara Kachar; Mustafa Tekin; Hong-Bo Zhao; Gary D Housley; Mary-Claire King; Xue Z Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Characteristics of Vibration that Alter Cardiovascular Parameters in Mice.

Authors:  Yao Li; Karyne N Rabey; Daniel Schmitt; John N Norton; Randall P Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Characterization of Train-Induced Vibration and its Effect on Fecal Corticosterone Metabolites in Mice.

Authors:  Nicholas A Atanasov; Jennifer L Sargent; John P Parmigiani; Rupert Palme; Helen E Diggs
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Sonothermogenetics for noninvasive and cell-type specific deep brain neuromodulation.

Authors:  Yaoheng Yang; Christopher Pham Pacia; Dezhuang Ye; Lifei Zhu; Hongchae Baek; Yimei Yue; Jinyun Yuan; Mark J Miller; Jianmin Cui; Joseph P Culver; Michael R Bruchas; Hong Chen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.