Literature DB >> 3230874

Environmental ultrasound in laboratories and animal houses: a possible cause for concern in the welfare and use of laboratory animals.

G D Sales1, K J Wilson, K E Spencer, S R Milligan.   

Abstract

Many laboratory animals are known to be sensitive to sounds (ultrasounds) beyond the nominal upper limit (20 kHz) of the human hearing range. Sources of sound in laboratories and animal houses were examined to determine the extent of ambient ultrasound. Of 39 sources monitored, 24 were found to emit ultrasonic sounds. Many of these (e.g. cage washers and hoses) also produced sound in the audible range. Running taps, squeaky chairs and rotating glass stoppers created particularly high sound pressure levels and contained frequencies to over 100 kHz. The oscilloscopes and visual display units investigated provided particular cause for concern as they emitted sounds that were entirely ultrasonic and therefore were apparently silent. Ambient ultrasound therefore appears to be common in laboratories and animal houses. It is suggested that its effect on laboratory animals should be investigated and guidelines on acceptable levels be formulated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3230874     DOI: 10.1258/002367788780746188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  9 in total

Review 1.  Hearing in laboratory animals: strain differences and nonauditory effects of noise.

Authors:  Jeremy G Turner; Jennifer L Parrish; Larry F Hughes; Linda A Toth; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Genetic reduction of group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors alters select behaviors in a mouse model for fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Alexia M Thomas; Nghiem Bui; Deanna Graham; Jennifer R Perkins; Lisa A Yuva-Paylor; Richard Paylor
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Noise and Vibration in the Vivarium: Recommendations for Developing a Measurement Plan.

Authors:  Jeremy G Turner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Vacuum-cleaner noise and acute stress responses in female C57BL/6 mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Kelly Jensen; Nina E Hahn; Rupert Palme; Katherine Saxton; Darlene D Francis
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Noise in a laboratory animal facility from the human and mouse perspectives.

Authors:  Randall P Reynolds; Will L Kinard; Jesse J Degraff; Ned Leverage; John N Norton
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Analysis of environmental sound levels in modern rodent housing rooms.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Bradford J May; Ziwei Judy Hao; Julie Watson
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.625

7.  Decreased blastocyst production in mice exposed to increased rack noise.

Authors:  Bernadette M Zamora; Meisheng Jiang; Ying Wang; Minghua Chai; P Timothy Lawson; Gregory W Lawson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Effect of population heterogenization on the reproducibility of mouse behavior: a multi-laboratory study.

Authors:  S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner; Benjamin Zipser; Lars Lewejohann; Norbert Sachser; Chadi Touma; Britta Schindler; Sabine Chourbaji; Christiane Brandwein; Peter Gass; Niek van Stipdonk; Johanneke van der Harst; Berry Spruijt; Vootele Võikar; David P Wolfer; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Roadbumps at the Crossroads of Integrating Behavioral and In Vitro Approaches for Neurotoxicity Assessment.

Authors:  G Jean Harry; Sandra McBride; Shannah K Witchey; Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja; Alain Trembleau; Matthew Bridge; Anna Bencsik
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.