Literature DB >> 2085642

The effect of retrospective sampling on binary regression models for clustered data.

J M Neuhaus1, N P Jewell.   

Abstract

Recently a great deal of attention has been given to binary regression models for clustered or correlated observations. The data of interest are of the form of a binary dependent or response variable, together with independent variables X1,...., Xk, where sets of observations are grouped together into clusters. A number of models and methods of analysis have been suggested to study such data. Many of these are extensions in some way of the familiar logistic regression model for binary data that are not grouped (i.e., each cluster is of size 1). In general, the analyses of these clustered data models proceed by assuming that the observed clusters are a simple random sample of clusters selected from a population of clusters. In this paper, we consider the application of these procedures to the case where the clusters are selected randomly in a manner that depends on the pattern of responses in the cluster. For example, we show that ignoring the retrospective nature of the sample design, by fitting standard logistic regression models for clustered binary data, may result in misleading estimates of the effects of covariates and the precision of estimated regression coefficients.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2085642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

Review 1.  Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity?

Authors:  John Fieberg; Jason Matthiopoulos; Mark Hebblewhite; Mark S Boyce; Jacqueline L Frair
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  On the validity of within-nuclear-family genetic association analysis in samples of extended families.

Authors:  Alexandre Bureau; Thierry Duchesne
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2015-12

3.  On outcome-dependent sampling designs for longitudinal binary response data with time-varying covariates.

Authors:  Jonathan S Schildcrout; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  On the analysis of two-phase designs in cluster-correlated data settings.

Authors:  C Rivera-Rodriguez; D Spiegelman; S Haneuse
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Approaches to retrospective sampling for longitudinal transition regression models.

Authors:  Sally Hunsberger; Paul S Albert; Marie Thoma
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.582

6.  Using Retrospective Sampling to Estimate Models of Relationship Status in Large Longitudinal Social Networks.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Sudeshna Paul
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Distinct Gene Profiles for Tumor and Non-Tumor Tissue in the Head and Neck: An Analytical Approach.

Authors:  Mei Lu; Josena K Stephen; Kang Mei Chen; Shaleta Havard; Maria J Worsham
Journal:  J Cancer Sci Ther       Date:  2011-12-07

8.  An evolutionary framework for association testing in resequencing studies.

Authors:  C Ryan King; Paul J Rathouz; Dan L Nicolae
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Likelihood-based analysis of longitudinal data from outcome-related sampling designs.

Authors:  John M Neuhaus; Alastair J Scott; Christopher J Wild; Yannan Jiang; Charles E McCulloch; Ross Boylan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The effect of misspecification of random effects distributions in clustered data settings with outcome-dependent sampling.

Authors:  John M Neuhaus; Charles E McCulloch
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 0.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.