Literature DB >> 24571396

Likelihood-based analysis of longitudinal data from outcome-related sampling designs.

John M Neuhaus1, Alastair J Scott, Christopher J Wild, Yannan Jiang, Charles E McCulloch, Ross Boylan.   

Abstract

Investigators commonly gather longitudinal data to assess changes in responses over time and to relate these changes to within-subject changes in predictors. With rare or expensive outcomes such as uncommon diseases and costly radiologic measurements, outcome-dependent, and more generally outcome-related, sampling plans can improve estimation efficiency and reduce cost. Longitudinal follow up of subjects gathered in an initial outcome-related sample can then be used to study the trajectories of responses over time and to assess the association of changes in predictors within subjects with change in response. In this article, we develop two likelihood-based approaches for fitting generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to longitudinal data from a wide variety of outcome-related sampling designs. The first is an extension of the semi-parametric maximum likelihood approach developed in Neuhaus, Scott and Wild (2002, Biometrika 89, 23-37) and Neuhaus, Scott and Wild (2006, Biometrics 62, 488-494) and applies quite generally. The second approach is an adaptation of standard conditional likelihood methods and is limited to random intercept models with a canonical link. Data from a study of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children motivates the work and illustrates the findings.
© 2013, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditional likelihood; Retrospective sampling; Subject-specific models

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24571396      PMCID: PMC3954410          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  5 in total

1.  The effect of retrospective sampling on binary regression models for clustered data.

Authors:  J M Neuhaus; N P Jewell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Family-specific approaches to the analysis of case-control family data.

Authors:  J M Neuhaus; A J Scott; C J Wild
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Sex differences in young children who meet criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Cynthia M Hartung; Erik G Willcutt; Benjamin B Lahey; William E Pelham; Jan Loney; Mark A Stein; Kate Keenan
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2002-12

4.  The effect of misspecification of random effects distributions in clustered data settings with outcome-dependent sampling.

Authors:  John M Neuhaus; Charles E McCulloch
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 0.875

5.  Longitudinal studies of binary response data following case-control and stratified case-control sampling: design and analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Schildcrout; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Outcome-dependent sampling in cluster-correlated data settings with application to hospital profiling.

Authors:  Glen McGee; Jonathan Schildcrout; Sharon-Lise Normand; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.175

2.  BIASED SAMPLING DESIGNS TO IMPROVE RESEARCH EFFICIENCY: FACTORS INFLUENCING PULMONARY FUNCTION OVER TIME IN CHILDREN WITH ASTHMA.

Authors:  Jonathan S Schildcrout; Paul J Rathouz; Leila R Zelnick; Shawn P Garbett; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Small-sample inference for cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling schemes in resource-limited settings: Investigating low birthweight in Rwanda.

Authors:  Sara Sauer; Bethany Hedt-Gauthier; Claudia Rivera-Rodriguez; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 1.701

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.