M Rudes1, F Schwan2, F Klass3, H G Gassner4. 1. The Finesse Center for Facial Plastic Surgery/ENT, Froehliche-Tuerkenstraße 8, 93047, Regensburg, Germany. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Schwandorf, Germany. 4. The Finesse Center for Facial Plastic Surgery/ENT, Froehliche-Tuerkenstraße 8, 93047, Regensburg, Germany. gassner.holger@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Turbinate surgery is an important adjunct to functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. Many studies have analyzed the effects of various mucosal-sparing techniques, such as radiofrequency, laser, shaver, and others. These techniques, however, result in the destruction of the submucosal tissue of the turbinate. The goal of this study was to determine whether excellent functional outcome could be achieved with techniques sparing both the mucosa and submucosa from destruction when addressing the turbinates in rhinoplasty surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective single-surgeon clinical study analyzing submucous resection of turbinate bone without destruction of the submucosa or mucosa in patients undergoing functional-esthetic rhinoplasty was performed. In all, 122 patients (47 men, 75 women, average age: 32.1 years, range: 16-69 years) were eligible for the study. The functional outcome was measured prospectively using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score. Occurrence of complications was documented. RESULTS: Of over 1000 surgical patients, 307 candidates fulfilled multiple selection criteria and were entered in a rhinoplasty database. The surveys sufficient for the present study were completed by 122 of 307 patients (39.7%), of whom 91 patients reported improvement, 14 patients reported no subjective change, and 12 patients reported minimal worsening of nasal breathing. Overall, postoperative function was excellent (preoperative vs. postoperative NOSE score 47.5 vs. 20.1, p < 0.001). A large proportion of patients reporting worsening of symptoms (50%) were diagnosed with decongestant nasal spray abuse. Specific complications such as bleeding, foul drainage, dryness, and crusting were not reported. CONCLUSION: All function-bearing structures of the inferior nasal turbinates, mucosa, and submucosa can be fully preserved without impairment of functional outcome during rhinoplasty. The technique of selective submucous bone resection is as an excellent alternative for patients undergoing rhinoplasty for concomitant treatment or prevention of nasal obstruction.
BACKGROUND: Turbinate surgery is an important adjunct to functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. Many studies have analyzed the effects of various mucosal-sparing techniques, such as radiofrequency, laser, shaver, and others. These techniques, however, result in the destruction of the submucosal tissue of the turbinate. The goal of this study was to determine whether excellent functional outcome could be achieved with techniques sparing both the mucosa and submucosa from destruction when addressing the turbinates in rhinoplasty surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective single-surgeon clinical study analyzing submucous resection of turbinate bone without destruction of the submucosa or mucosa in patients undergoing functional-esthetic rhinoplasty was performed. In all, 122 patients (47 men, 75 women, average age: 32.1 years, range: 16-69 years) were eligible for the study. The functional outcome was measured prospectively using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score. Occurrence of complications was documented. RESULTS: Of over 1000 surgical patients, 307 candidates fulfilled multiple selection criteria and were entered in a rhinoplasty database. The surveys sufficient for the present study were completed by 122 of 307 patients (39.7%), of whom 91 patients reported improvement, 14 patients reported no subjective change, and 12 patients reported minimal worsening of nasal breathing. Overall, postoperative function was excellent (preoperative vs. postoperative NOSE score 47.5 vs. 20.1, p < 0.001). A large proportion of patients reporting worsening of symptoms (50%) were diagnosed with decongestant nasal spray abuse. Specific complications such as bleeding, foul drainage, dryness, and crusting were not reported. CONCLUSION: All function-bearing structures of the inferior nasal turbinates, mucosa, and submucosa can be fully preserved without impairment of functional outcome during rhinoplasty. The technique of selective submucous bone resection is as an excellent alternative for patients undergoing rhinoplasty for concomitant treatment or prevention of nasal obstruction.
Authors: Michael G Stewart; David L Witsell; Timothy L Smith; Edward M Weaver; Bevan Yueh; Maureen T Hannley Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Bozena B Wrobel; Alexander G Bien; Eric H Holbrook; George E Meyer; Neil A Bratney; Jane Meza; Donald A Leopold Journal: Am J Rhinol Date: 2006 May-Jun