Literature DB >> 23242490

Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy with epidural vs. general anesthesia.

Sharona B Ross1, Devanand Mangar, Rachel Karlnoski, Enrico Camporesi, Katheryne Downes, Kenneth Luberice, Krista Haines, Alexander S Rosemurgy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery involves a single umbilical incision, lending itself to epidural anesthesia. This prospective, randomized study was undertaken to evaluate epidural anesthesia for patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy, to assess the feasibility, and to analyze all intraoperative and postoperative complications. The secondary objectives were to determine differences in postoperative pain and time until PACU discharge-to-home readiness between patients.
METHODS: With institutional review board approval, 20 patients with chronic cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and/or biliary dyskinesia were randomized to receive spinal epidural anesthesia (n = 10) or general anesthesia (n = 10). Postoperative pain at rest was recorded in the PACU every 10 min, and at rest and walking at discharge using the visual analog scale (VAS). Operative time and time until PACU discharge-to-home readiness were recorded. Results are expressed as mean ± SD.
RESULTS: Patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and body mass index were similar. There were no additional ports/incisions, conversions to "open" operations, or conversions to general anesthesia. There were no differences in operative duration. Time until postanesthesia care unit discharge-to-home ready was not significantly different. The most common postoperative adverse event was urinary retention (1 epidural and 3 general anesthesia patients). Resting postoperative VAS pain score at discharge was 4.7 ± 2.5 vs. 2.2 ± 1.6 (p = 0.02, general versus epidural anesthesia respectively); the stressed VAS pain score at discharge was 6.1 ± 2.3 vs. 3.1 ± 2.8 (p = 0.02, general versus epidural anesthesia respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: LESS cholecystectomy with epidural anesthesia was completed with no operative or anesthetic conversions, and less postoperative pain at discharge. Epidural anesthesia appears to be a preferable alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23242490     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2667-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

Review 1.  Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention--effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review.

Authors:  Peter Jensen; Trine Mikkelsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Steven E Hodgett; Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona B Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: a study of 3492 patients.

Authors:  Rajeev Sinha; A K Gurwara; S C Gupta
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  The cardiocirculatory effects of upper thoracic epidural analgesia.

Authors:  P E Otton; E J Wilson
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1966-11

5.  The effect of intraperitoneal ropivacaine on pain after laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yong Hee Park; Hyun Kang; Young Cheol Woo; Sun Gyoo Park; Chong Wha Baek; Yong Hun Jung; Jin Yun Kim; Gill Hoi Koo; Seong Deok Kim; Jun Seok Park
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  The effect of epidural versus general anesthesia on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Y Shir; S N Raja; S M Frank
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Modifications to the postanesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  J A Aldrete
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.084

8.  Stress responses in three different anesthetic techniques for carbon dioxide laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H Aono; A Takeda; S D Tarver; H Goto
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.452

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Yunus Nadi Yuksek; Arif Zeki Akat; Ugur Gozalan; Gul Daglar; Yasar Pala; Mehmet Canturk; Tanju Tutuncu; Nuri Aydin Kama
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients.

Authors:  Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Pros and Cons.

Authors:  P Marco Fisichella; Steven R DeMeester; Eric Hungness; Silvana Perretta; Nathaniel J Soper; Alexander Rosemurgy; Alfonso Torquati; Ajit K Sachdeva; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under epidural anesthesia: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ranendra Hajong; Peter Daniel S Khariong; Arup J Baruah; Madhur Anand; Donkupar Khongwar
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11

3.  Laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal conditions under spinal anaesthesia: Towards a multidisciplinary minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Diego Raimondo; Giulia Borghese; Manuela Mastronardi; Mohamed Mabrouk; Paolo Salucci; Agnese Lambertini; Paolo Casadio; Claudia Tonini; Maria Cristina Meriggiola; Alessandro Arena; Giulia Tarozzi; Renato Seracchioli
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-05-16

4.  Comparison of Postoperative Events between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xian-Xue Wang; Quan Zhou; Dao-Bo Pan; Hui-Wei Deng; Ai-Guo Zhou; Hua-Jing Guo; Fu-Rong Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.