Literature DB >> 20850544

The utility of geometrical and chemical restraint information extracted from predicted ligand-binding sites in protein structure refinement.

Michal Brylinski1, Seung Yup Lee, Hongyi Zhou, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

Exhaustive exploration of molecular interactions at the level of complete proteomes requires efficient and reliable computational approaches to protein function inference. Ligand docking and ranking techniques show considerable promise in their ability to quantify the interactions between proteins and small molecules. Despite the advances in the development of docking approaches and scoring functions, the genome-wide application of many ligand docking/screening algorithms is limited by the quality of the binding sites in theoretical receptor models constructed by protein structure prediction. In this study, we describe a new template-based method for the local refinement of ligand-binding regions in protein models using remotely related templates identified by threading. We designed a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model that selects correct binding site geometries in a large ensemble of multiple receptor conformations. The SVR model employs several scoring functions that impose geometrical restraints on the Cα positions, account for the specific chemical environment within a binding site and optimize the interactions with putative ligands. The SVR score is well correlated with the RMSD from the native structure; in 47% (70%) of the cases, the Pearson's correlation coefficient is >0.5 (>0.3). When applied to weakly homologous models, the average heavy atom, local RMSD from the native structure of the top-ranked (best of top five) binding site geometries is 3.1Å (2.9Å) for roughly half of the targets; this represents a 0.1 (0.3)Å average improvement over the original predicted structure. Focusing on the subset of strongly conserved residues, the average heavy atom RMSD is 2.6Å (2.3Å). Furthermore, we estimate the upper bound of template-based binding site refinement using only weakly related proteins to be ∼2.6Å RMSD. This value also corresponds to the plasticity of the ligand-binding regions in distant homologues. The Binding Site Refinement (BSR) approach is available to the scientific community as a web server that can be accessed at http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/bsr/.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20850544      PMCID: PMC3036769          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  86 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Systems biology in drug discovery.

Authors:  Eugene C Butcher; Ellen L Berg; Eric J Kunkel
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

4.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Improving homology models for protein-ligand binding sites.

Authors:  Chris Kauffman; Huzefa Rangwala; George Karypis
Journal:  Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf       Date:  2008

6.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.

Authors:  J Liang; H Edelsbrunner; C Woodward
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 7.  Protein folding: the endgame.

Authors:  M Levitt; M Gerstein; E Huang; S Subbiah; J Tsai
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 23.643

8.  Small Molecule Subgraph Detector (SMSD) toolkit.

Authors:  Syed Asad Rahman; Matthew Bashton; Gemma L Holliday; Rainer Schrader; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  Q-Dock: Low-resolution flexible ligand docking with pocket-specific threading restraints.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Are predicted protein structures of any value for binding site prediction and virtual ligand screening?

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Mu Gao
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  In-silico analysis of caspase-3 and -7 proteases from blood-parasitic Schistosoma species (Trematoda) and their human host.

Authors:  Shakti Kumar; Devendra Kumar Biswal; Veena Tandon
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2013-05-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.