Literature DB >> 18293308

Q-Dock: Low-resolution flexible ligand docking with pocket-specific threading restraints.

Michal Brylinski1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

The rapidly growing number of theoretically predicted protein structures requires robust methods that can utilize low-quality receptor structures as targets for ligand docking. Typically, docking accuracy falls off dramatically when apo or modeled receptors are used in docking experiments. Low-resolution ligand docking techniques have been developed to deal with structural inaccuracies in predicted receptor models. In this spirit, we describe the development and optimization of a knowledge-based potential implemented in Q-Dock, a low-resolution flexible ligand docking approach. Self-docking experiments using crystal structures reveals satisfactory accuracy, comparable with all-atom docking. All-atom models reconstructed from Q-Dock's low-resolution models can be further refined by even a simple all-atom energy minimization. In decoy-docking against distorted receptor models with a root-mean-square deviation, RMSD, from native of approximately 3 A, Q-Dock recovers on average 15-20% more specific contacts and 25-35% more binding residues than all-atom methods. To further improve docking accuracy against low-quality protein models, we propose a pocket-specific protein-ligand interaction potential derived from weakly homologous threading holo-templates. The success rate of Q-Dock employing a pocket-specific potential is 6.3 times higher than that previously reported for the Dolores method, another low-resolution docking approach. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18293308      PMCID: PMC2726574          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  50 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.

Authors:  Esther Kellenberger; Jordi Rodrigo; Pascal Muller; Didier Rognan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-01

5.  Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking.

Authors:  Badry D Bursulaya; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ferrari; Binqing Q Wei; Luca Costantino; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round 6.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Burkhard Rost; Tim Hubbard; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

8.  TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Adrian K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

9.  Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.

Authors:  Andreas Evers; Gerhard Hessler; Hans Matter; Thomas Klabunde
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  27 in total

1.  Functional implications of structural predictions for alternative splice proteins expressed in Her2/neu-induced breast cancers.

Authors:  Rajasree Menon; Ambrish Roy; Srayanta Mukherjee; Saveliy Belkin; Yang Zhang; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 2.  FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction.

Authors:  Ambrish Roy; Alper Kucukural; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Are predicted protein structures of any value for binding site prediction and virtual ligand screening?

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Mu Gao
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Status of GPCR modeling and docking as reflected by community-wide GPCR Dock 2010 assessment.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva; Manuel Rueda; Vsevolod Katritch; Raymond C Stevens; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  FINDSITEcomb2.0: A New Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening of Proteins and Virtual Target Screening of Biomolecules.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Hongnan Cao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Assessing the similarity of ligand binding conformations with the Contact Mode Score.

Authors:  Yun Ding; Ye Fang; Juana Moreno; J Ramanujam; Mark Jarrell; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  FINDSITE(comb): a threading/structure-based, proteomic-scale virtual ligand screening approach.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Accuracy of protein-protein binding sites in high-throughput template-based modeling.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Protein structure prediction: when is it useful?

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.