| Literature DB >> 20849608 |
Sherine George1, Siddharth V Bhalerao, Erich A Lidstone, Irfan S Ahmad, Atiya Abbasi, Brian T Cunningham, Kenneth L Watkin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There has been a long standing interest in the identification of medicinal plants and derived natural products for developing cancer therapeutics. Our study focuses upon pancreatic cancer, due to its high mortality rate, that is attributed in part to the lack of an effective chemotherapeutic agent. Previous reports on the use of medicinal plant extracts either alone or alongside conventional anticancer agents in the treatment of this cancer have shown promising results. This work aims to investigate the therapeutic properties of a library of medicinal plants from Bangladesh.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20849608 PMCID: PMC2954938 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-10-52
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
The names of the 56 plant extracts screened in this study.
| 2 | Amaranthaceae | Pet-ether fraction of MeOH extract | 0.43 ± 0.14 | |
| 3 | Amaranthaceae | MeOH residue of MeOH extract | 1.63 ± 0.41 | |
| 5 | Meliaceae | Pet-ether partitionate of MeOH extract | 0.36 ± 0.17 | |
| 7 | Meliaceae | EtOAc partitionate of MeOH extract | 2.38 ± 0.35 | |
| 9 | Meliaceae | Pet-ether extract | 0.10 ± 0.02 | |
| 10 | Meliaceae | MeOH extract | 0.79 ± 0.18 | |
| 11 | Dipterocarpaceae | MeOH extract | 3.18 ± 0.18 | |
| 12 | Combretaceae | EtOH extract | 0.18 ± 0.06 | |
| 13 | Solanaceae | MeOH extract | 0.79 ± 0.14 | |
| 14 | Solanaceae | MeOH extract | 1.46 ± 0.27 | |
| 15 | Anacardiaceae | MeOH extract | 0.23 ± 0.11 | |
| 18 | Meliaceae | MeOH extract | 0.21 ± 0.11 | |
| 19 | Lauraceae | MeOH extract | 0.59 ± 0.15 | |
| 21 | Combretaceae | CHCl3 partitionate of acidified MeOH extract | 0.35 ± 0.12 | |
| 22 | Combretaceae | MeOH extract | 1.15 ± 0.23 | |
| 23 | Asteraceae | MeOH extract | 0.50 ± 0.03 | |
| 24 | Sapindaceae | MeOH extract | 0.93 ± 0.03 | |
| 25 | Moraceae | MeOH extract | 0.57 ± 0.08 | |
| 26 | Burseraceae | MeOH extract | 0.60 ± 0.19 | |
| 27 | Papilionaceae | EtOH extract | 0.77 ± 0.26 | |
| 28 | Anacardiaceae | MeOH extract | 2.44 ± 0.15 | |
| 29 | Sapindaceae | MeOH extract | 0.27 ± 0.11 | |
| 30 | Sapindaceae | MeOH extract | 0.75 ± 0.19 | |
| 31 | Solanaceae | MeOH extract | 0.10 ± 0.02 | |
| 32 | Solanaceae | MeOH extract | 1.26 ± 0.29 | |
| 33 | Solanaceae | MeOH extract | 0.66 ± 0.22 | |
| 35 | Solanaceae | MeOH extract | 0.46 ± 0.16 | |
| 38 | Euphorbiaceae | Hexane fraction of CH2Cl2 extract | 0.60 ± 0.26 | |
| 39 | Euphorbiaceae | Acidified CHCl3 fraction of aqueous extract | 1.25 ± 0.31 | |
| 40 | Euphorbiaceae | Acetone extract | 1.36 ± 0.21 | |
| 42 | Leguminosea | MeOH extract | 0.14 ± 0.07 | |
| 43 | Burseraceae | MeOH extract | 1.65 ± 0.12 | |
| 44 | Sterculiaceae | MeOH extract | 0.59 ± 0.06 | |
| 45 | Combretaceae | Pet-ether extract | 1.19 ± 0.31 | |
| 46 | Combretaceae | MeOH extract | 1.07 ± 0.24 | |
| 47 | Sapindaceae | MeOH extract | 1.57 ± 0.18 | |
| 48 | Anacardiaceae | MeOH extract | 2.10 ± 0.05 | |
| 49 | Dipterocarpaceae | EtOH extract | 0.48 ± 0.16 | |
| 52 | Anacardiaceae | MeOH extract | 1.83 ± 0.14 | |
| 53 | Anacardiaceae | MeOH extract | 2.92 ± 0.17 | |
| 54 | Combretaceae | MeOH extract | 0.22 ± 0.05 | |
| 55 | Combretaceae | MeOH extract | 1.64 ± 0.26 | |
| 56 | Umbelliferae | EtOH extract | 1.04 ± 0.18 | |
| 57 | Rutaceae | MeOH residue of MeOH extract | 0.55 ± 0.05 | |
| 59 | Meliaceae | n-Hexane partitionate of MeOH extract | 1.12 ± 0.05 | |
| 60 | Meliaceae | MeOH residue of MeOH extract | 0.62 ± 0.18 | |
| 61 | Rhamnaceae | MeOH extract | 0.90 ± 0.19 |
The last column presents the anti-proliferative activity of each extract and the top nine cytotoxic extracts are in bold*.
*The PC biosensor was used to screen this library for extracts with anti-proliferative properties and the results are presented as the fraction of Panc-1 (human pancreatic cancer) cell survival relative to untreated controls after exposure to the plant extract. A testing concentration of 100 μg/mL and exposure time of 24 hours was used. Mean ± S.D. values of three replicates are reported here.
Figure 1PWV shift images in false color with shift scale bars indicating the magnitude of wavelength shifts in nanometers. Pixels with higher PWV displayed in brighter colors, indicate locations where Panc-1 cell attachment has occurred. The five image sets represent the following (a) untreated control, (b) positive control (DOX), (c) positive control (Curcumin), (d) extract that induced 100% cell death (P. punctata, No. 34), (e) extract that enhanced proliferation (A. glabra, No. 11). In each image set, the top image was taken before exposure and the bottom image was taken after the 24 hour exposure period with a plant extract or positive control at 100 μg/mL. Scale bar (white) = 300 μm.
Figure 256 plant extracts were screened for their ability to induce Panc-1 cell death using the PC biosensor assay to determine the fractions of cell surviving after 24 h exposure to the extract. Dox and Curcumin are the positive controls. Nine extracts induced > 80% cell death. Data represents mean ± S.D. values of three replicates.
Figure 3Subsequent MTT cell viability tests on two additional pancreatic cancer cell lines revealed that four plant extracts (Nos. 4, 6, 34, and 41) were able to suppress proliferation in all three strains. Reported mean ± S.D. values are from a representative trial out of two or more trials.
Figure 4Growth inhibitory effects of (A) . Proliferation suppression appears to be dose dependant. Reported mean ± S.D. values are from a representative trial out of two or more trials.
IC50 values of P. punctata (Extract No. 34), A. sessilis (No. 4) and A. chittagonga (No. 6) for human pancreatic cancer and human foreskin fibroblast cell lines.
| Cell line | IC50 (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Panc-1 | 20.34 ± 13.99 | 27.19 ± 3.01 | 48.60 ± 4.59 |
| MIA | 24.97 ± 4.59 | 13.08 ± 10.40 | 42.79 ± 5.88 |
| Capan-1 | 31.39 ± 2.91 | 34.92 ± 2.20 | 49.82 ± 11.60 |
| Hs68 | 25.81 ± 0.44 | 32.82 ± 10.74 | > 100 |
Mean ± S.D. values of two or more independent trials are reported below.
Figure 5(A) Caspase-3 activity of Panc-1 cells treated with 100 μg/ml of . (B) Caspase-3 activity of lysates from untreated, 34-treated, and Staurosporine treated Panc-1 cells in the absence and presence of a caspase-3 inhibitor (Ac-DEVD-CHO). Treatment period lasted three hours.