Literature DB >> 20849492

The evolution of cooperative breeding in the African cichlid fish, Neolamprologus pulcher.

Marian Wong1, Sigal Balshine.   

Abstract

The conundrum of why subordinate individuals assist dominants at the expense of their own direct reproduction has received much theoretical and empirical attention over the last 50 years. During this time, birds and mammals have taken centre stage as model vertebrate systems for exploring why helpers help. However, fish have great potential for enhancing our understanding of the generality and adaptiveness of helping behaviour because of the ease with which they can be experimentally manipulated under controlled laboratory and field conditions. In particular, the freshwater African cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher, has emerged as a promising model species for investigating the evolution of cooperative breeding, with 64 papers published on this species over the past 27 years. Here we clarify current knowledge pertaining to the costs and benefits of helping in N. pulcher by critically assessing the existing empirical evidence. We then provide a comprehensive examination of the evidence pertaining to four key hypotheses for why helpers might help: (1) kin selection; (2) pay-to-stay; (3) signals of prestige; and (4) group augmentation. For each hypothesis, we outline the underlying theory, address the appropriateness of N. pulcher as a model species and describe the key predictions and associated empirical tests. For N. pulcher, we demonstrate that the kin selection and group augmentation hypotheses have received partial support. One of the key predictions of the pay-to-stay hypothesis has failed to receive any support despite numerous laboratory and field studies; thus as it stands, the evidence for this hypothesis is weak. There have been no empirical investigations addressing the key predictions of the signals of prestige hypothesis. By outlining the key predictions of the various hypotheses, and highlighting how many of these remain to be tested explicitly, our review can be regarded as a roadmap in which potential paths for future empirical research into the evolution of cooperative breeding are proposed. Overall, we clarify what is currently known about cooperative breeding in N. pulcher, address discrepancies among studies, caution against incorrect inferences that have been drawn over the years and suggest promising avenues for future research in fishes and other taxonomic groups.
© 2010 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20849492     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00158.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  29 in total

1.  First- and second-order sociality determine survival and reproduction in cooperative cichlids.

Authors:  Arne Jungwirth; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Kinship reduces alloparental care in cooperative cichlids where helpers pay-to-stay.

Authors:  Markus Zöttl; Dik Heg; Noémie Chervet; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Group-size-dependent punishment of idle subordinates in a cooperative breeder where helpers pay to stay.

Authors:  Stefan Fischer; Markus Zöttl; Frank Groenewoud; Barbara Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A comparative study of an innate immune response in Lamprologine cichlid fishes.

Authors:  Constance M O'Connor; Adam R Reddon; Susan E Marsh-Rollo; Jennifer K Hellmann; Isaac Y Ligocki; Ian M Hamilton; Sigal Balshine
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-08-19

5.  Reverse audience effects on helping in cooperatively breeding marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  R K Brügger; T Kappeler-Schmalzriedt; J M Burkart
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Social buffering of stress in a group-living fish.

Authors:  Brett M Culbert; Kathleen M Gilmour; Sigal Balshine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Reproductive sharing in relation to group and colony-level attributes in a cooperative breeding fish.

Authors:  Jennifer K Hellmann; Isaac Y Ligocki; Constance M O'Connor; Adam R Reddon; Kelly A Garvy; Susan E Marsh-Rollo; H Lisle Gibbs; Sigal Balshine; Ian M Hamilton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Group size adjustment to ecological demand in a cooperative breeder.

Authors:  Markus Zöttl; Joachim G Frommen; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Non-random brood mixing suggests adoption in a colonial cichlid.

Authors:  Franziska C Schaedelin; Wouter F D van Dongen; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  A three-dimensional stereotaxic MRI brain atlas of the cichlid fish Oreochromis mossambicus.

Authors:  José M Simões; Magda C Teles; Rui F Oliveira; Annemie Van der Linden; Marleen Verhoye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.