Literature DB >> 24277978

Non-random brood mixing suggests adoption in a colonial cichlid.

Franziska C Schaedelin1, Wouter F D van Dongen, Richard H Wagner.   

Abstract

Parental care of unrelated offspring is widespread but not well understood. We used 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci to investigate the relatedness of fry and parentally caring adults in a 118-nest colony of the socially and genetically monogamous cichlid fish Neolamprologus caudopunctatus in Lake Tanganyika. There was a high proportion of brood mixing, with 59% of 32 broods containing fry unrelated to both parents, and 18% of all 291 sampled fry being unrelated to the breeding pair. There was no evidence of kin selection for adoption because the genetic and foster parents were not more related than expected by chance. Parentage was assigned to 12 adopted fry from 10 broods. Distances traversed by fry varied markedly, from less than one to over 40 meters. The larger distances suggest that at least some brood mixing was instigated by parents transporting portions of their broods in their mouths, as occurs in some cichlids. Further evidence of non-random brood mixing was that foreign fry did not differ in size from their foster siblings within broods, even though they were significantly larger than fry produced by the tending pairs within the colony. These findings suggest that at least some foreign fry had dispersed non-randomly and were adopted by their foster parents. Enlarged broods are known to provide reduced per capita predation, making it potentially adaptive for breeders to adopt unrelated offspring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adoption; brood farming out; brood mixing; cichlid; microsatellite analysis; parental care; parental investment

Year:  2013        PMID: 24277978      PMCID: PMC3837205          DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol        ISSN: 1045-2249            Impact factor:   2.671


  13 in total

Review 1.  Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function.

Authors:  Simon C Griffith; Ian P F Owens; Katherine A Thuman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Brood mixing and reduced polyandry in a maternally mouthbrooding cichlid with elevated among-breeder relatedness.

Authors:  Kristina M Sefc; Caroline M Hermann; Barbara Taborsky; Stephan Koblmüller
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment.

Authors:  Steven T Kalinowski; Mark L Taper; Tristan C Marshall
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kilner; Naomi E Langmore
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-01-12

5.  A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Clayton M Small; Kimberly A Paczolt; Nicholas L Ratterman
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  COMMUNAL CARE AND KIDNAPPING OF YOUNG BY PARENTAL CICHLIDS.

Authors:  Kenneth R McKaye; N M McKaye
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Ostriches recognise their own eggs and discard others.

Authors:  B C Bertram
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Adoption of chicks and the level of relatedness in common gull, Larus canus, colonies: DNA fingerprinting analyses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  The evolution of cooperative breeding in the African cichlid fish, Neolamprologus pulcher.

Authors:  Marian Wong; Sigal Balshine
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2010-09-17

10.  Evolutionary conservation of microsatellite flanking regions and their use in resolving the phylogeny of cichlid fishes (Pisces: Perciformes).

Authors:  R Zardoya; D M Vollmer; C Craddock; J T Streelman; S Karl; A Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sex biases in kin shoaling and dispersal in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Wouter F D van Dongen; Richard H Wagner; Yoshan Moodley; Franziska C Schaedelin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mate choice and genetic monogamy in a biparental, colonial fish.

Authors:  Franziska C Schaedelin; Wouter F D van Dongen; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Genetic evidence for prevalence of alloparental care in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish, Perissodus microlepis, from Lake Tanganyika supports the "selfish shepherd effect" hypothesis.

Authors:  Hyuk Je Lee; Valentin Heim; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.