Literature DB >> 20847824

Role of Breast Ultrasound for the Detection and Differentiation of Breast Lesions.

Helmut Madjar1.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of breast cancer has been widely improved since the development of high-resolution ultrasound equipment. In the past, ultrasound was only considered useful for the diagnosis of cysts. Meanwhile, it improves the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, local preoperative staging and guided interventional diagnosis. In dense breasts, mammography has limited sensitivity. Furthermore, women with dense parenchyma have a highly increased risk of breast cancer development. Ultrasound is useful to examine dense breast tissue. Recent studies have shown that the detection of small cancers with high-resolution ultrasound is increased by 3-4 cancers per 1,000 women without clinical or mammographic abnormalities. Furthermore, stage distribution is similar between mammographically and sonographically detected carcinomas. Ultrasound is routinely used for curative diagnosis, to overcome the limitations of mammography. However, within the mammographic screening in Germany, breast density is not considered as important. Ultrasound is only used if a suspicious lesion is detected by mammography. Interestingly, 2 years ago, a screening project started in Austria in which ultrasound is always added in cases of dense breasts. Preliminary data show that the detection of additional carcinomas is increased in the same order as shown in previous studies. Therefore, an improved cancer detection and differentiation can be expected with high-resolution ultrasound.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20847824      PMCID: PMC2931046          DOI: 10.1159/000297775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  35 in total

1.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  H M Zonderland; E G Coerkamp; J Hermans; M J van de Vijver; A E van Voorthuisen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  W A Berg; P L Gilbreath
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population?

Authors:  H A Moss; P D Britton; C D Flower; A H Freeman; D J Lomas; R M Warren
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review.

Authors:  P B Gordon; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Likelihood of malignancy in breast lesions characterised by ultrasound with a combined diagnostic score.

Authors:  E Baez; K Strathmann; M Vetter; H Madjar; B-J Hackelöer
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.

Authors:  W Buchberger; P DeKoekkoek-Doll; P Springer; P Obrist; M Dünser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Mammographically occult breast cancer. A pathologic and radiologic study.

Authors:  R Holland; J H Hendriks; M Mravunac
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall; C M Powell; M G Hochman; L J Solin; B L Fowble; M H Torosian; E F Rosato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  How can additional ultrasonography screening improve the detection of occult breast cancer in women with dense breasts?

Authors:  Parisa Pishdad; Ameneh Moosavi; Reza Jalli; Fariba Zarei; Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam; Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-13

3.  Breast Cancer in Nepal: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Mohan Giri; Mamata Giri; Rabin Jung Thapa; Bibhuti Upreti; Bijay Pariyar
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-02-05

4.  Can acoustic structural quantification be used to characterize the ultrasound echotexture of the peripheral zone of breast lesions?

Authors:  Annika Bach; Clarissa Hameister; Torsten Slowinski; Ernst Michael Jung; Anke Thomas; Thomas Fischer
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  All-reflective ring illumination system for photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Suhail Salem Alshahrani; Yan Yan; Naser Alijabbari; Alexander Pattyn; Ivan Avrutsky; Eugene Malyarenko; Joemini Poudel; Mark Anastasio; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  A Simple Ultrasound Based Classification Algorithm Allows Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions by Using Only Quantitative Parameters.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Ramona Woitek; Paola Clauser; Maria Bernathova; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Advancing translational research with next-generation protein microarrays.

Authors:  Xiaobo Yu; Brianne Petritis; Joshua LaBaer
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  Photoacoustic Tomography with a Ring Ultrasound Transducer: A Comparison of Different Illumination Strategies.

Authors:  Naser Alijabbari; Suhail S Alshahrani; Alexander Pattyn; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.679

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.