Literature DB >> 20844106

Rapid online correction is selectively suppressed during movement with a visuomotor transformation.

V Gritsenko1, J F Kalaska.   

Abstract

Reaching movements to visual targets are under fast feedback control, which can rapidly correct an ongoing movement for errors. This study investigates how this online correction is affected by the application of a new visuomotor transformation. Thirty-two subjects made planar pointing movements to visual targets. Vision of the arm was prevented, and hand position was represented by a cursor displayed in the movement plane. In some trials, the target abruptly changed location at the onset of arm movement, which required a rapid correction of movement direction. After performing baseline trials, some subjects were required to adapt to a mirror-image transformation that inverted the visual feedback of their hand position across the body midline, whereas others were not familiarized with the transformation. Afterward, subjects' online correction was tested with target jumps in the presence of the mirror transformation. Results show that after short-term motor adaptation to the mirror transformation there was a selective suppression of the rapid non-mirror correction in the direction of visual target displacement but no mirror reversal. The suppression occurred within the first few trials after the introduction of the mirror transformation, and it was strongest for the movements in which the transformation caused the largest dissociation between the target location and hand movement. Finally, whether or not the short-latency non-mirror correction was suppressed in a given trial, the mirror correction occurred at the same latency as the onset time of voluntary correction in subjects who had not experienced the mirror transformation.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20844106     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00909.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

Review 1.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adapting to inversion of the visual field: a new twist on an old problem.

Authors:  Timothy P Lillicrap; Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Rosalinda Diaz; Douglas B Tweed; Nikolaus F Troje; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Computations underlying sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Did We Get Sensorimotor Adaptation Wrong? Implicit Adaptation as Direct Policy Updating Rather than Forward-Model-Based Learning.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; John W Krakauer; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual Feedback Processing of the Limb Involves Two Distinct Phases.

Authors:  Kevin P Cross; Tyler Cluff; Tomohiko Takei; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Rapid Visuomotor Corrective Responses during Transport of Hand-Held Objects Incorporate Novel Object Dynamics.

Authors:  Jonathan S Diamond; Joseph Y Nashed; Roland S Johansson; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Human hyolaryngeal movements show adaptive motor learning during swallowing.

Authors:  Ianessa A Humbert; Heather Christopherson; Akshay Lokhande; Rebecca German; Marlis Gonzalez-Fernandez; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Learning feedback and feedforward control in a mirror-reversed visual environment.

Authors:  Shoko Kasuga; Sebastian Telgen; Junichi Ushiba; Daichi Nozaki; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  New directions for understanding neural control in swallowing: the potential and promise of motor learning.

Authors:  Ianessa A Humbert; Rebecca Z German
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Learning course adjustments during arm movements with reversed sensitivity derivatives.

Authors:  Mohamed N Abdelghani; Douglas B Tweed
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.