| Literature DB >> 2084207 |
T J Stein1, J F Corcoran, R M Zillich.
Abstract
There have been conflicting reports on the accuracy of electronic devices used for determining working length. The influence of the major and minor diameters on electronic probe measurements were evaluated to ascertain whether anatomical features of the apical portion of the canal might be responsible for these discrepancies. Forty-seven nonrestorable teeth selected from 22 patients were studied. Conventional access was made. A Kerr file was placed to a position 0.5 mm from the major foramen as registered by the Neosono-D apex locator. The electronic probe length was then measured. After the tooth was extracted, the file was fixed with autopolymerizing composite in the canal. A Buehler Isomet lapadary saw was used to prepare specimens to a thickness of 500 microns. A Bioquant II Image Analysis System was used to measure and record distances. It was found that as the width of the major foramen increased, the discrepancy between the electronic probe tip length induction and the actual position of the major foramen increased.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1990 PMID: 2084207 DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(07)80213-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endod ISSN: 0099-2399 Impact factor: 4.171