Literature DB >> 12913682

Evaluation of proprostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer in men with a total prostate specific antigen range of 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml.

Masood A Khan1, Alan W Partin, Harry G Rittenhouse, Stephen D Mikolajczyk, Lori J Sokoll, Daniel W Chan, Robert W Veltri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In contemporary screening populations a major drawback of prostate specific antigen (PSA) is its relative lack of specificity, especially in the range of 4 to 10 ng/ml, where prostate cancer is found 25% of the time. ProPSA is a derivative of free PSA (fPSA) consisting of the truncated forms (eg [-2]proPSA, [-4]proPSA or the full-length [-7]proPSA). There is increasing evidence that proPSA is associated preferentially with prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether proPSA can influence the detection of early prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Archival serum samples obtained from 93 men who underwent a systematic 12-core prostate biopsy (total PSA range 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml) were assayed for percent free PSA, total PSA and the 3 forms of proPSA (Hybritech Tandem Assays Beckman Coulter Access, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, California). Free PSA, the cumulative sum of individual proPSA forms ([-2], [-4] and [-7], or sum-proPSA) and derivatives were determined. Of the 93 men assessed 41 (44%) had evidence of prostate cancer (76% Gleason 5/6, 19% Gleason 7 and 5% Gleason 8). Prostate volume was measured at systematic 12-core biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer. Results were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression (LR) nonparametric statistical methods.
RESULTS: Using univariate LR, fPSA, percent fPSA (%fPSA), percent sum-proPSA and prostate volume significantly (p <0.05) differentiated men with prostate cancer from those with benign disease. However, applying stepwise backward multivariate LR, total PSA, %fPSA and sum-proPSA were retained and generated a receiver operator characteristic curve with an area under the curve of 76.6%. At 90% sensitivity these 3 variables collectively achieved a specificity of 44% for the detection of prostate cancer. Individually, the 3 retained variables had a specificity of 23% (total PSA), 33% (%fPSA) and 13% (sum-proPSA).
CONCLUSIONS: Sum-proPSA, total PSA and %fPSA in combination improve the specificity of early prostate cancer detection in men with a total PSA of 4 to 10 ng/ml compared with the results of individual PSA molecular forms measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913682     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086940.10392.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

1.  [Diagnostic validity of rectal touch].

Authors:  F Bobé-Armant
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 2.  Recent advances in the field of urology.

Authors:  Chester J Koh; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Lori J Sokoll; Martin G Sanda; Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Isaac A Mizrahi; Dennis L Broyles; Alan W Partin; Sudhir Srivastava; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Association of [-2]proPSA with biopsy reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb; Zhaoyong Feng; Sumit Isharwal; Patricia Landis; Debra J Elliot; Robert Veltri; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Bruce Trock; Lori J Sokoll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Prostate cancer: diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Nigel Borley; Mark R Feneley
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Stability of [-2]Pro-PSA in whole blood and serum: analysis for optimal measurement conditions.

Authors:  Tsukasa Igawa; Kosuke Takehara; Toru Onita; Kazuto Ito; Hideki Sakai
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Pro-prostate-specific antigen measurements in serum and tissue are associated with treatment necessity among men enrolled in expectant management for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Sumit Isharwal; Lori J Sokoll; Patricia Landis; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Screening for prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 9.  PSA, PSA derivatives, proPSA and prostate health index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sema Nur Ayyıldız; Ali Ayyıldız
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-06

10.  Newer potential biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Paul H Lange
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.