Literature DB >> 20838965

The ups and downs of structure-activity landscapes.

Rajarshi Guha1.   

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss the landscape view of structure-activity relationships (SARs). The motivation for such a view is that SARs come in a variety of forms, such as those where small changes in structure lead to small changes in activity or where small structural lead to significant changes in activity (also termed activity cliffs). Thus, an SAR dataset is viewed as a landscape comprised of smooth plains, rolling hills, and jagged gorges. We review the history of this view and early quantitative approaches that attempted to encode the landscape. We then discuss some recent developments that directly characterize structure-activity landscapes, in one case with the goal of highlighting activity cliffs while the other allows one to resolve different types of SAR that may be present in a dataset. We highlight some applications of these approaches, such as predictive model development and SAR elucidation, to SAR datasets obtained from the literature. Finally, we conclude with a summary of the landscape approach and why it provides an intuitive and rigorous alternative to standard views of structure-activity data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20838965      PMCID: PMC3159128          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  14 in total

1.  Rapid evaluation of synthetic and molecular complexity for in silico chemistry.

Authors:  Tharun Kumar Allu; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  On outliers and activity cliffs--why QSAR often disappoints.

Authors:  Gerald M Maggiora
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Matched molecular pairs as a guide in the optimization of pharmaceutical properties; a study of aqueous solubility, plasma protein binding and oral exposure.

Authors:  Andrew G Leach; Huw D Jones; David A Cosgrove; Peter W Kenny; Linette Ruston; Philip MacFaul; J Matthew Wood; Nicola Colclough; Brian Law
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Molecular transformations as a way of finding and exploiting consistent local QSAR.

Authors:  Robert P Sheridan; Peter Hunt; J Chris Culberson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  SAR index: quantifying the nature of structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Lisa Peltason; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Structure--activity landscape index: identifying and quantifying activity cliffs.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha; John H Van Drie
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Assessing how well a modeling protocol captures a structure-activity landscape.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha; John H Van Drie
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validation of "molecular diversity" descriptors.

Authors:  D E Patterson; R D Cramer; A M Ferguson; R D Clark; L E Weinberger
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-08-02       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Discovery and SAR study of novel dihydroquinoline containing glucocorticoid receptor ligands.

Authors:  Hidenori Takahashi; Younes Bekkali; Alison J Capolino; Thomas Gilmore; Susan E Goldrick; Richard M Nelson; Donna Terenzio; Ji Wang; Ljiljana Zuvela-Jelaska; John Proudfoot; Gerald Nabozny; David Thomson
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Pyrrolidinones as orally bioavailable antagonists of the human melanocortin-4 receptor with anti-cachectic activity.

Authors:  Joe A Tran; Fabio C Tucci; Wanlong Jiang; Dragan Marinkovic; Caroline W Chen; Melissa Arellano; Stacy Markison; Beth A Fleck; Jenny Wen; Nicole S White; Joseph Pontillo; John Saunders; Daniel Marks; Sam R Hoare; Ajay Madan; Alan C Foster; Chen Chen
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  6 in total

1.  Structure-based predictions of activity cliffs.

Authors:  Jarmila Husby; Giovanni Bottegoni; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Computational tools and resources for metabolism-related property predictions. 1. Overview of publicly available (free and commercial) databases and software.

Authors:  Megan L Peach; Alexey V Zakharov; Ruifeng Liu; Angelo Pugliese; Gregory Tawa; Anders Wallqvist; Marc C Nicklaus
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Activity landscape image analysis using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Javed Iqbal; Martin Vogt; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  On the validity versus utility of activity landscapes: are all activity cliffs statistically significant?

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha; José L Medina-Franco
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 5.  Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently.

Authors:  Andrew Currin; Neil Swainston; Philip J Day; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 6.  In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity.

Authors:  Arwa B Raies; Vladimir B Bajic
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2016-01-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.