Literature DB >> 20838618

Deficient liver biosynthesis of docosahexaenoic acid correlates with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease.

Giuseppe Astarita1, Kwang-Mook Jung, Nicole C Berchtold, Vinh Q Nguyen, Daniel L Gillen, Elizabeth Head, Carl W Cotman, Daniele Piomelli.   

Abstract

Reduced brain levels of docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3), a neurotrophic and neuroprotective fatty acid, may contribute to cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Here, we investigated whether the liver enzyme system that provides docosahexaenoic acid to the brain is dysfunctional in this disease. Docosahexaenoic acid levels were reduced in temporal cortex, mid-frontal cortex and cerebellum of subjects with Alzheimer's disease, compared to control subjects (P  =  0.007). Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores positively correlated with docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios in temporal cortex (P =  0.005) and mid-frontal cortex (P  =  0.018), but not cerebellum. Similarly, liver docosahexaenoic acid content was lower in Alzheimer's disease patients than control subjects (P  =  0.011). Liver docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios correlated positively with MMSE scores (r  =  0.78; P<0.0001), and negatively with global deterioration scale grades (P  =  0.013). Docosahexaenoic acid precursors, including tetracosahexaenoic acid (C24:6n-3), were elevated in liver of Alzheimer's disease patients (P  =  0.041), whereas expression of peroxisomal d-bifunctional protein, which catalyzes the conversion of tetracosahexaenoic acid into docosahexaenoic acid, was reduced (P  = 0.048). Other genes involved in docosahexaenoic acid metabolism were not affected. The results indicate that a deficit in d-bifunctional protein activity impairs docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis in liver of Alzheimer's disease patients, lessening the flux of this neuroprotective fatty acid to the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20838618      PMCID: PMC2935886          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Alzheimer's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized clinically by progressive cognitive impairment [1]. Age is the most important factor that predisposes persons to the non-familial form of the disease, which in 2010 affected over 35 million elderly adults worldwide [2]. How aging interacts with other risk factors for Alzheimer's disease [3] is still unknown. It appears, however, that certain age-related pathologies that are closely associated with systemic dysfunctions in lipid metabolism – including obesity and diabetes – might be involved [1]. The polyunsaturated lipid, docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3), is an essential component of neuronal membranes [4], [5] and a precursor for potent neuroprotective mediators [6]–[8]. Mammals obtain docosahexaenoic acid directly from dietary sources, especially fish, but can also produce it in liver from n-3 fatty acid precursors present in plants [9]–[11]. When the diet does not provide an adequate supply of these foods, as is often the case in contemporary populations [12], the liver's capacity to generate docosahexaenoic acid may become critical to keep normal the brain levels of this fatty acid [9], [11], [13], [14]. Figure 1 shows an overview of liver docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis. Elongase and desaturase enzymes localized in the endoplasmic reticulum of the hepatocyte progressively add carbon units and double bonds to shorter-chain n-3 fatty acids, producing the very-long-chain tetracosahexaenoic acid (C24:6n-3). This is transported into peroxisomes and then converted to docosahexaenoic acid by the sequential action of acyl-coenzyme A oxidases, d-bifunctional protein and peroxisomal thiolases [15]–[18]. Liver-derived docosahexaenoic acid reaches the brain through the circulation, probably bound to proteins that are also synthesized by hepatocytes [9].
Figure 1

Overview of docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis in liver.

Diet-derived α-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) is transformed into tetracosahexaenoic acid (C24:6n-3) by the sequential action of Δ6 and Δ5 desaturases (encoded by the FADS2 and FADS1 genes, respectively) and elongases (such as that encoded by the HELO1 gene) present in the endoplasmatic reticulum. Tetracosahexaenoic acid is transported into peroxisomes (shaded area), presumably by proteins encoded by the ABCD1 or ABCD2 genes, and then converted into docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3) by sequential action of acyl coenzyme-A oxidase (encoded by the ACOX1 gene), d-bifunctional protein (encoded by the HSD17B4 gene), and various peroxisomal thiolases (not shown). The figure shows chemical structures of fatty acids quantified in our analyses.

Overview of docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis in liver.

Diet-derived α-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) is transformed into tetracosahexaenoic acid (C24:6n-3) by the sequential action of Δ6 and Δ5 desaturases (encoded by the FADS2 and FADS1 genes, respectively) and elongases (such as that encoded by the HELO1 gene) present in the endoplasmatic reticulum. Tetracosahexaenoic acid is transported into peroxisomes (shaded area), presumably by proteins encoded by the ABCD1 or ABCD2 genes, and then converted into docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3) by sequential action of acyl coenzyme-A oxidase (encoded by the ACOX1 gene), d-bifunctional protein (encoded by the HSD17B4 gene), and various peroxisomal thiolases (not shown). The figure shows chemical structures of fatty acids quantified in our analyses. Evidence indicates that docosahexaenoic acid serves important neurotrophic functions during early mammalian development [19], particularly as precursors of phospholipids during synaptogenesis, but is still unclear whether it plays protective roles in adulthood and old age. Several, albeit not all, epidemiological and clinical studies suggest that higher intake of docosahexaenoic acid decreases the risk of cognitive decline and dementia in elderly adults [4]. Animal experiments support this conclusion [20]–[22] and further indicate that the fatty acid might exert these effects by promoting neuronal survival [7], [23]. The related question of whether alterations in brain docosahexaenoic acid levels might accompany cognitive decline has been addressed using post mortem brain tissue from Alzheimer's disease patients and age-matched control subjects [6], [24]–[30]. Despite some disparities, these investigations generally support the hypothesis that Alzheimer's disease may be associated with deficits in brain docosahexaenoic acid [31]. In the present study, we reexamined this possibility and searched for supporting correlative evidence that a failing in brain docosahexaenoic acid integrity might result from defective n-3 fatty acid metabolism in liver, as previously suggested by Scott and Bazan [9].

Results

Docosahexaenoic acid levels in brain

Brain levels of non-esterified (‘free’) docosahexaenoic acid were measured in extracts of temporal cortex, mid-frontal cortex and cerebellum from a total of 17 control subjects and 37 Alzheimer's disease patients. Table 1 shows estimated mean differences between the two groups after linear regression adjustment for age, gender and post mortem interval. There were statistically detectable differences (P<0.05) in docosahexaenoic acid content in all regions examined. The pooled adjusted difference between control subjects and Alzheimer's disease patients (95% confidence intervals) was −28.87 nanomoles per gram of tissue (−49.81, −7.94; P = 0.007).
Table 1

Levels of free docosahexaenoic acid (nmol/g) and docosahexaenoate-containing phosphatidylethanolamine (nmol/g) in various brain regions of control subjects and subjects with Alzheimer's disease.

Control subjectsSubjects with Alzheimer's diseaseAdjusted DifferenceP-value*
Mean ± SD ; NMean ± SD ; N(95% CI)
DHA
Temporal cortex123.61±24.07 ; 17102.29±40.66 ; 36−23.87 ( −45.18, −2.57 )0.029
Frontal cortex119.99±50.8 ; 1797.45±26.19 ; 37−22.11 ( −42.37, −1.85 )0.033
Cerebellum218.18±101.66 ; 16174.86±45.22 ; 35−42.58 ( −83.31, −1.84 )0.041
Pooled152.64±79.12 ; 17124.35±51.72 ; 37−28.87 ( −49.81, −7.94 )0.007
Phosphatidylethanolamine**
Temporal cortex11.52±3.58 ; 178.26±4.06 ; 36−3.22 ( −5.56, −0.88 )0.008
Frontal cortex29.7±5.94 ; 1723.83±5.84 ; 37−5.82 ( −9.32, −2.32 )0.002
Cerebellum13.71±4.16 ; 1610.37±4.75 ; 35−3.44 ( −6.28, −0.61 )0.018
Pooled18.4±9.43 ; 1714.32±8.6 ; 38−4.14 ( −7.2, −1.09 )0.008

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.

*P-values for differences between means were computed by linear regression analysis for each fatty acid in selected brain regions and Generalized Estimating Equations for the pooled analysis in the entire brain after adjustment for age, gender, and post mortem interval.

**Phosphatidylethanolamine was 1-stearoyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-phosphoethanolamine.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. *P-values for differences between means were computed by linear regression analysis for each fatty acid in selected brain regions and Generalized Estimating Equations for the pooled analysis in the entire brain after adjustment for age, gender, and post mortem interval. **Phosphatidylethanolamine was 1-stearoyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-phosphoethanolamine. Since docosahexaenoic acid is stored in membrane phospholipids, Table 1 also shows levels of docosahexaenoic acid-containing 1-stearoyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine in the three brain regions. There were significant differences between control subjects and Alzheimer's disease patients in all regions. The pooled adjusted difference between the two groups was −4.14 (−7.20, −1.09; P = 0.008). Levels of four n-3 fatty acids that serve as metabolic precursors for docosahexaenoic acid – α-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n-3), docosapentaenoic acid (C22:5n-3) and tetracosahexaenoic acid (C24:6n-3) – were quantified in the same extracts. There were marginally statistically detectable differences between control subjects and Alzheimer's disease patients only for mid-frontal cortex α-linolenic acid (P = 0.045) (Table 2). However, a significant difference between the two groups was detected when α-linolenic acid content was pooled across brain regions. No differences were observed for eicosapentaenoic acid and docosapentaenoic acid. Tetracosahexaenoic acid levels were below the detection limit of our assay (0.5 picomoles per sample).
Table 2

Levels of free n-3 fatty acids (nmol/g) in various brain regions of control subjects and subjects with Alzheimer's disease.

n-3 Fatty acidControl subjectsSubjects with Alzheimer's diseaseAdjusted DifferenceP-value*
Mean ± SD ; NMean ± SD ; N(95% CI)
α-Linolenic (C18:3)
Temporal cortex1.75±0.36 ; 171.95±0.76 ; 360.17 ( −0.22, 0.57 )0.387
Frontal cortex2.07±0.42 ; 172.46±0.79 ; 370.39 ( 0.01, 0.78 )0.045
Cerebellum1.65±0.54 ; 161.91±0.59 ; 350.27 ( −0.08, 0.62 )0.130
Pooled1.82±0.47 ; 172.12±0.76 ; 370.29 ( 0.06, 0.52 )0.019
Eicosapentaenoic (C20:5)
Temporal cortex2.13±1.18 ; 171.95±1.34 ; 36−0.21 ( −0.99, 0.58 )0.596
Frontal cortex2.18±1.09 ; 172.27±1.57 ; 370.08 ( −0.8, 0.97 )0.848
Cerebellum1.64±1.11 ; 161.46±0.48 ; 35−0.17 ( −0.62, 0.27 )0.437
Pooled1.99±1.13 ; 171.9±1.26 ; 37−0.06 ( −0.59, 0.47 )0.829
Docosapentaenoic (C22:5)
Temporal cortex3.98±2.52 ; 173.72±3.23 ; 36−0.24 ( −2.09, 1.61 )0.718
Frontal cortex7.45±1.69 ; 177.25±2.41 ; 37−0.15 ( −1.45, 1.16 )0.821
Cerebellum9.45±4.59 ; 169.67±2.78 ; 350.20 ( −1.87, 2.26 )0.850
Pooled7.01±3.81 ; 176.84±3.72 ; 37−0.17 ( −1.28, 0.94 )0.919

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.

*P-values for differences between means were computed by linear regression analysis for each fatty acid in selected brain regions and Generalized Estimating Equations for the pooled analysis in the entire brain after adjustment for age, gender, and post mortem interval.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. *P-values for differences between means were computed by linear regression analysis for each fatty acid in selected brain regions and Generalized Estimating Equations for the pooled analysis in the entire brain after adjustment for age, gender, and post mortem interval. Figure S1 shows individual data points for docosahexaenoic acid and 1-stearoyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine in temporal cortex from control subjects and Alzheimer's disease patients. The figure also reports the statistical correlation between temporal cortex docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios and most recent MMSE scores (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.44, P = 0.005). A comparable correlation was detected between individual MMSE scores and docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios in mid-frontal cortex (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.38, P = 0.018), but not in cerebellum (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.27, P = 0.12). Previous reports suggested that low brain levels of docosahexaenoic acid may be accompanied by decreases in n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids [25], [28], [32]. Here, no significant differences were observed in mid-frontal cortex and cerebellum for free linoleic acid (C18:2n-6), eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n-6) or arachidonic acid (C20:4n-6) between control subjects and Alzheimer's disease patients (Table S1). A difference was detectable, however, for arachidonic acid in temporal cortex (P = 0.02).

Docosahexaenoic acid levels in liver

The conversion of α-linolenic acid into docosahexaenoic acid occurs primarily in liver [5], [9], [13]. To examine whether this pathway is altered in Alzheimer's disease, n-3 fatty acids were quantified in liver samples from a second cohort of 9 control subjects and 14 Alzheimer's disease patients. These subjects were selected from a larger available pool because they were negative for hepatitis B or hepatitis C antibodies and, at autopsy, revealed no histological signs of liver disease. A list of medications taken by the subjects is provided in Table S2. There were statistically detectable differences between the two groups for docosahexaenoic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosapentaenoic acid and tetracosahexaenoic acid (Table 3). Additionally, differences were observed for the docosahexaenoic acid-containing phospholipid, 1-O-1′-(Z)-octadecenyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (Table 3).
Table 3

Levels of free n-3 fatty acids (nmol/g) and docosahexanoate-containing phosphatidylethanolamine (nmol/g) in liver of control subjects and subjects with Alzheimer's disease.

n-3 Fatty acidControl subjectsSubjects with Alzheimer's diseaseAdjusted DifferenceP-value*
Mean ± SD ; N = 9Mean ± SD ; N = 14(95% CI)
α-Linolenic (C18:3)28.55±7.8836.72±22.0511.19 (−4.53, 26.9)0.152
Eicosapentaenoic (C20:5)44.57±14.7467.4±29.4627.29 (6.69, 47.88)0.012
Docosapentaenoic (C22:5)21.51±8.9732.39±13.8212.7 (2.37, 23.03)0.019
Tetrahexaenoic (C24:6)0.73±0.170.9±0.210.19 (0.01, 0.38)0.041
Docosahexaenoic (C22:6)324.83±122.89204.64±74.62−107.79 (−187.71, −27.87)0.011
Phosphatidylethanolamine** 75.49±32.3046.42±15.73−34.68 (−55.86, −13.50)0.003

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.

*P-values for differences between means were computed by linear regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, and post mortem interval.

**Phosphatidylethanolamine was 1-O-1′-(Z)-octadecenyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. *P-values for differences between means were computed by linear regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, and post mortem interval. **Phosphatidylethanolamine was 1-O-1′-(Z)-octadecenyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine. Figure 2 shows individual data points for docosahexaenoic acid and 1-O-1′-(Z)-octadecenyl,2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine in liver, along with correlation analyses between liver docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios and most recent MMSE and global deterioration scale scores. The ratios were positively correlated with MMSE scores (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.78, P<0.0001) (Fig. 2C) and negatively correlated with global deterioration scale grades (P = 0.013; Fig. 2D).
Figure 2

Liver metabolism in Alzheimer's disease patients.

Levels of free docosahexaenoic acid (Panel A) and 1-O-1′-(Z)-octadecenyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (Panel B) in liver tissue from control subjects (open squares) and Alzheimer's disease patients (closed circles). Correlation between individual docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios in liver and most recent Mini-Mental State Examination scores (Panel C) or global deterioration scale grades (Panel D). HSD17B4 mRNA, encoding for d-bifunctional protein (Panel E) and pristanic acid levels (Panel F) in liver from control subjects (open squares) and subjects with Alzheimer's disease (closed circles). Lipid content is expressed in nanomoles per gram of wet tissue and mRNA levels are expressed in arbitrary units. There were statistically detectable differences between control subjects and Alzheimer's disease patients in the levels of docosahexaenoic acid (P = 0.0077) and 1-O-1′-(Z)-octadecenyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (P = 0.003) by two-tailed Welch's t-test. There was a significant correlation between docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios in liver and Mini-Mental State Examination scores with use of the partial correlation analysis after adjustment for age, gender and post mortem interval. Global deterioration scale grades correlate significantly (P = 0.013) with the docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios using a linear regression analysis adjusting for age, gender and post mortem interval. There were statistically detectable differences between control subjects and patients in the levels of HSD17B4 mRNA (P = 0.048) and pristanic acid (P = 0.0009) by two-tailed Welch's t-test.

Liver metabolism in Alzheimer's disease patients.

Levels of free docosahexaenoic acid (Panel A) and 1-O-1′-(Z)-octadecenyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (Panel B) in liver tissue from control subjects (open squares) and Alzheimer's disease patients (closed circles). Correlation between individual docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios in liver and most recent Mini-Mental State Examination scores (Panel C) or global deterioration scale grades (Panel D). HSD17B4 mRNA, encoding for d-bifunctional protein (Panel E) and pristanic acid levels (Panel F) in liver from control subjects (open squares) and subjects with Alzheimer's disease (closed circles). Lipid content is expressed in nanomoles per gram of wet tissue and mRNA levels are expressed in arbitrary units. There were statistically detectable differences between control subjects and Alzheimer's disease patients in the levels of docosahexaenoic acid (P = 0.0077) and 1-O-1′-(Z)-octadecenyl, 2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (P = 0.003) by two-tailed Welch's t-test. There was a significant correlation between docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios in liver and Mini-Mental State Examination scores with use of the partial correlation analysis after adjustment for age, gender and post mortem interval. Global deterioration scale grades correlate significantly (P = 0.013) with the docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios using a linear regression analysis adjusting for age, gender and post mortem interval. There were statistically detectable differences between control subjects and patients in the levels of HSD17B4 mRNA (P = 0.048) and pristanic acid (P = 0.0009) by two-tailed Welch's t-test. No differences were noted for free eicosatrienoic acid and arachidonic acid. In nanomoles per gram of tissue, eicosatrienoic acid was 75.26±33.37 in control subjects and 88.80±39.40 in Alzheimer's disease patients (P = 0.17); and arachidonic acid was 522.46±177.19 in control subjects and 435.96±172.80 in Alzheimer's disease patients (P = 0.46). A significant difference was observed, however, for free linoleic acid, the content of which was, in nanomoles per gram of tissue, 849.00±277.48 in control subjects and 580.17±253.79 in Alzheimer's disease patients (P = 0.042).

Docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis in liver

The expression of genes involved in docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis was measured in the same liver samples. There were statistically detectable differences only for the peroxisomal enzyme d-bifunctional protein (encoded by the HSD17B4 gene), which catalyzes the conversion of tetracosahexaenoic acid into docosahexaenoic acid [17], [18] (Table 4). Individual data points for HSD17B4 mRNA are reported in Figure 2E.
Table 4

Expression of genes involved in docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis and peroxisomal function in liver of control subjects and subjects with AD.

GeneControl SubjectsSubjects with Alzheimer's diseaseAdjusted DifferenceP-value*
SymbolMean ± SD; N = 9Mean ± SD; N = 14(95% CI)
FADS2 0.02±0.0290.016±0.0099−0.0017 (−0.02, 0.017)0.851
HELO1 0.011±0.0120.006±0.0046−0.0043 (−0.012, 0.0036)0.265
FADS1 0.037±0.0610.024±0.026−0.0071 (−0.044, 0.03)0.693
ABCD1 0.027±0.0340.02±0.024−0.0089 (−0.036, 0.018)0.500
ABCD2 8e-04±0.0010.0011±0.00130.00031 (−8e-04, 0.0014)0.567
ACOX1 0.2±0.240.31±0.680.069 (−0.45, 0.59)0.782
HSD17B4 0.18±0.0450.14±0.046−0.041 (−0.083, −0.00039)0.048
PEX13 0.041±0.0170.037±0.017−0.0047 (−0.022, 0.012)0.569
PEX14 0.0087±0.0040.013±0.0220.0029 (−0.013, 0.019)0.700
PEX19 0.018±0.0180.012±0.0054−0.0055 (−0.016, 0.0051)0.291

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.

*P-values for differences between means were computed by linear regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, and RNA integrity number.

Hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 4, HSD17B4; for other abbreviations see Text S1.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. *P-values for differences between means were computed by linear regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, and RNA integrity number. Hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 4, HSD17B4; for other abbreviations see Text S1. Since d-bifunctional protein participates in the degradation of branched-chain fatty acids, such as phytanic acid and pristanic acid, the levels of these compounds were also measured. In nanomoles per gram of tissue, phytanic acid was 1.93±0.51 in control subjects and 4.33±1.80 in Alzheimer's disease patients [adjusted difference (95% confidence intervals): 2.53 (1.17, 3.90); P = 0.001]; pristanic acid was 2.10±1.05 in control subjects and 4.23±1.58 in Alzheimer's disease patients [adjusted difference (95% confidence intervals): 2.37 (1.03, 3.70); P = 0.002]. Individual data points for pristanic acid are shown in Figure 2F.

Discussion

The first objective of this study was to reexamine the association, suggested by past reports [6], [24]–[30], between Alzheimer's disease and lowered brain docosahexaenoic acid content. Our findings provide new evidence in support of such association and further reveal the existence of a positive correlation between brain docosahexaenoic acid levels and cognitive status. To identify potential mechanisms responsible for the observed breakdown in brain docosahexaenoic acid integrity, we next focused our attention on the liver because of the critical role played by this organ in supplying docosahexaenoic acid to the brain [5], [9], [13]. Our results indicate that docosahexaenoic acid levels and expression of d-bifunctional protein, a key enzyme of docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis, are selectively reduced in liver of Alzheimer's disease patients. The functional significance of these findings is underscored by the identification of a strong positive correlation between liver docosahexaenoic acid content and cognitive status (P<0.0001). Previous studies have suggested that brain levels of docosahexaenoic acid [6] and docosahexaenoic acid-containing phospholipids [24]–[30] are reduced in Alzheimer's disease (see [31] for a discussion of discordances). Our investigations confirmed those results. In agreement with Lukiw et al. (2005) [6], we found that docosahexaenoic acid is reduced in temporal cortex and mid-frontal cortex from 37 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, compared to 17 closely matched control subjects. Additionally, our analyses suggested that (i) this deficit is selective for docosahexaenoic acid, because other n-3 or n-6 fatty acids are only marginally affected, and (ii) docosahexaenoic acid levels in temporal cortex and mid-frontal cortex positively correlate with cognitive status. This correlation highlights the significance of brain docosahexaenoic acid in normal cognition, though further research is needed to determine if it represents cause and effect. We were surprised to find that a decrease in docosahexaenoic acid was clearly detectable in cerebellum, a brain region that is regarded as being less vulnerable to Alzheimer's pathology. This finding led us to hypothesize that the alteration in brain docosahexaenoic acid might result from a systemic deficiency in the biosynthesis of this fatty acid. In mammals, the enzyme pathway responsible for docosahexaenoic acid production is primarily localized to the liver [5], [9], [13]. Therefore, to determine whether this pathway is dysfunctional in Alzheimer's disease, we examined the lipid composition of liver samples from 14 patients and 9 control subjects, who displayed no histological sign of liver pathology. Our analyses show that liver tissue from Alzheimer's patients contains reduced levels of docosahexaenoic acid, but elevated levels of tetracosahexaenoic acid and other n-3 fatty acids. This profile is incompatible with a nutritional deficit in n-3 fatty acids and is suggestive of a defect in the last step of docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis – the β-oxidative conversion of tetracosahexaenoic acid into docosahexaenoic acid, which occurs in liver peroxisomes (Fig. 1). Two additional findings support this interpretation and point to a selective involvement of peroxisomal d-bifunctional protein: the accumulation of pristanic acid and phytanic acid, two substrates for liver d-bifunctional protein, and the lowered expression of the HSD17B4 gene, which encodes for this protein [17], [18], [33]. Notably, other genes included in our panel were not significantly different between Alzheimer's disease patients and control subjects. These results are consistent with previous reports suggesting that d-bifunctional protein mutations are associated with reduced docosahexaenoic acid levels in human liver and brain [34], [35]. The pathological events that lead to down-regulation of liver d-bifunctional protein in Alzheimer's disease remain to be discovered. However, a role for oxidative stress, which is known to accelerate age-dependent liver peroxisomal damage [36]–[38], might be hypothesized. Furthermore, it is important to note that our analyses were focused on docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis and did not evaluate the potential impact of other aspects of docosahexaenoic acid metabolism – including transport and oxidation. A significant outcome of our analyses was the discovery that liver docosahexaenoic acid levels are positive correlated with MMSE scores, and negatively correlated with global deterioration scale grades. Although it is well established that patients with advanced liver diseases show a decline in cognitive abilities [39], these findings reveal a previously unrecognized association between hepatic docosahexaenoic acid homeostasis and global cognition, and suggest that subtle changes in liver docosahexaenoic acid metabolism might be associated with dementia. This supports early suggestions that in neurodegenerative disorders and aging, a failure in the supply of docosahexaenoic acid from the liver may take place [9]. Moreover, a circulatory “long loop” connects the supply of docosahexaenoic acid to the biogenesis of excitable and photoreceptor membranes [40]. In retinal degenerative diseases, a shortage of blood docosahexaenoic acid has been demonstrated, and a failure of the “long loop” from the liver is suggested to underlie these changes [41]. Future prospective investigations should explore the temporal relationship between such changes and the development of Alzheimer's pathology. As with all observational studies, there is the possibility that unmeasured factors may explain our results, even though we chose a priori to adjust for the three most likely confounders – age, gender and post mortem interval. Furthermore, though limited by the lack of information on dosages and treatment duration, our analysis of the medication record reveals no obvious correlation between individual drug classes and liver docosahexaenoic acid (Figure S2). Despite these inevitable limitations, our results do suggest that a dysfunction in liver docosahexaenoic acid metabolism, at least partly caused by abnormal d-bifunctional protein expression, might predispose persons to Alzheimer's disease. This has implications both for clinical interventions with n-3 fatty acids, which should take into consideration the limited ability of Alzheimer's disease patients to complete docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis, and for the discovery of peripheral lipid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

Materials and Methods

Study design and tissue procurement

We conducted this study in two parts. We first determined whether brain levels of docosahexaenoic acid are altered in Alzheimer's disease [6], [24]–[30] and whether such alterations correlate with cognitive status. We used frozen brain samples from a total of 17 non-demented control subjects and 37 pathologically confirmed subjects with Alzheimer's disease (males/females: control subjects, 10/7; subjects with Alzheimer's disease, 20/17), provided by the Institute for Brain Aging and the Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at the University of California, Irvine. Three brain areas were selected for analysis: temporal cortex (Broadmann area 20; 17 control subjects and 36 subjects with Alzheimer's disease), mid-frontal cortex (Broadmann area 9; 17 control subjects and 37 subjects with Alzheimer's disease), and cerebellum (16 control subjects and 35 subjects with Alzheimer's disease). Subjects were matched for age (in years: control subjects, 80.5±8.5; subjects with Alzheimer's disease, 80.5±7.3) and post mortem interval (in hours: control subjects, 4.4±1.5; subjects with Alzheimer's disease, 4.2±1.7). Alzheimer's disease cases met the National Institute on Aging-Reagan Institute criteria for intermediate or high likehood of Alzheimer's disease. Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, a measure of cognitive status, were available for 10 control subjects (mean score±SD = 28.3±1.8; assessed 44.3±35.9 months before death) and 29 subjects with Alzheimer's disease (mean score±SD = 12.4±7.2; assessed 11.0±6.2 months before death). Because the liver is a primary source of brain docosahexaenoic acid, in the second part of the study we examined whether Alzheimer's disease might be associated with alterations in liver n-3 fatty acid metabolism. Frozen liver samples from a separate cohort of 9 control subjects and 14 subjects with Alzheimer's disease (males/females: control subjects, 7/2; subjects with Alzheimer's disease, 8/6) were obtained from the Banner Sun Health Research Institute (Sun City, AZ). These were selected from a larger available pool because they were negative for hepatitis B or hepatitis C antibodies and, at autopsy, revealed no histological signs of liver disease (by hematoxylin/eosin staining). They were matched for age (in years: control subjects, 83.9±5.4; subjects with Alzheimer's disease, 84.6±6.7) and post mortem interval (in hours: control subjects, 3.4±0.9; subjects with Alzheimer's disease, 3.2±0.6). Alzheimer's disease cases met the National Institute on Aging-Reagan Institute criteria for intermediate or high likelihood of Alzheimer's disease. MMSE scores were available for 7 control subjects (mean±SD = 28.1±1.7; assessed 7.1±5.6 months before death) and 12 subjects with Alzheimer's disease (mean±SD = 11.9±10.6; assessed 10.1±8.7 months before death). Global deterioration scale scores were available for 6 control subjects and 9 subjects with Alzheimer's disease. All subjects and their caregivers (when appropriate) provided written informed consent for both the clinical examination as well as for brain donation at the University of California Irvine and for liver donation at the Banner Sun Health Research Institute Brain and Body Donation Program. The protocols and informed consent have been approved by the University of California Irvine Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Banner Health Institutional Review Board.

Lipid and gene expression analyses

Analyses are described in Text S1 available online with this article.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics are presented as means ± SD. The differences between unadjusted mean values were determined by two-tailed Welch's t-test. Associations between parameters were tested by partial correlation analysis (Pearson's). Generalized Estimating Equations [42] were used to determine the overall association of individual lipid species with Alzheimer's disease – adjusting for the a priori-specified potential confounders of age, gender, and post mortem interval – by pooling data across frontal cortex, temporal cortex and cerebellum. An exchangeable working correlation structure was used in model fitting, and robust standard errors [43] were used for inference in the Generalized Estimating Equations analysis. Adjusting for the covariates listed above, we used linear regression to estimate the association between individual lipid species and Alzheimer's disease. Linear regression was also utilized to determine differences in mRNA expression levels adjusting for age, gender, and RNA integrity number. All confidence intervals correspond to a 95% confidence level without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Supplementary Materials and Methods. (0.06 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file. Levels of free DHA (Panel A) and 1-stearoyl-2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (Panel B) in temporal cortex of control subjects (open squares) and subjects with AD (closed circles). Correlation analysis between individual docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios in temporal cortex and most recent Mini-Mental State Examination scores (Panel C). Lipid content is expressed in nanomoles per gram of wet tissue. There were statistically detectable differences between control subjects and patients in the levels of DHA (P = 0.019) and 1-stearoyl-2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (P = 0.0084) by two-tailed Welch's t-test. There was a significant correlation between docosahexaenoic/α-linolenic ratios and Mini-Mental State Examination scores by partial correlation analysis after adjustment for age, gender and post mortem interval. (6.78 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file. Correlation between liver docosahexaenoic acid and individual drug classes taken by the control subjects (open squares) and Alzheimer's disease patients (closed circles). (6.78 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file. Levels of free n-6 fatty acids (nmol/g) in various brain regions of control subjects and subjects with Alzheimer's disease. (0.10 MB DOCX) Click here for additional data file. List of medications taken by the subjects involved in the liver study. (0.06 MB DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  39 in total

1.  Plasmalogen deficiency in early Alzheimer's disease subjects and in animal models: molecular characterization using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  X Han; D M Holtzman; D W McKeel
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 2.  Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Catalase turnover in rat liver and kidney as a function of age.

Authors:  J L Haining; J S Legan
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 4.032

Review 4.  Quantitative contributions of diet and liver synthesis to docosahexaenoic acid homeostasis.

Authors:  Stanley I Rapoport; Miki Igarashi; Fei Gao
Journal:  Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.006

5.  Lipid abnormalities in the brain in adult Down's syndrome and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  B W Brooksbank; M Martinez
Journal:  Mol Chem Neuropathol       Date:  1989-12

6.  Severe deficiency of docosahexaenoic acid in peroxisomal disorders: a defect of delta 4 desaturation?

Authors:  M Martínez
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Docosahexaenoic acid protects from dendritic pathology in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model.

Authors:  Frédéric Calon; Giselle P Lim; Fusheng Yang; Takashi Morihara; Bruce Teter; Oliver Ubeda; Phillippe Rostaing; Antoine Triller; Norman Salem; Karen H Ashe; Sally A Frautschy; Greg M Cole
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Neuroprotectin D1: a docosahexaenoic acid-derived docosatriene protects human retinal pigment epithelial cells from oxidative stress.

Authors:  Pranab K Mukherjee; Victor L Marcheselli; Charles N Serhan; Nicolas G Bazan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Membrane docosahexaenoate is supplied to the developing brain and retina by the liver.

Authors:  B L Scott; N G Bazan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Decreased content of docosahexaenoate and arachidonate in plasma phospholipids in Usher's syndrome.

Authors:  N G Bazan; B L Scott; T S Reddy; M Z Pelias
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1986-12-15       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  69 in total

Review 1.  Neuroglialpharmacology: myelination as a shared mechanism of action of psychotropic treatments.

Authors:  George Bartzokis
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Circulating ethanolamine plasmalogen indices in Alzheimer's disease: Relation to diagnosis, cognition, and CSF tau.

Authors:  Mitchel A Kling; Dayan B Goodenowe; Vijitha Senanayake; Siamak MahmoudianDehkordi; Matthias Arnold; Tyler J Massaro; Rebecca Baillie; Xianlin Han; Yuk-Yee Leung; Andrew J Saykin; Kwangsik Nho; Alexandra Kueider-Paisley; Jessica D Tenenbaum; Li-San Wang; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Rima F Kaddurah-Daouk
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Docosahexaenoic acid signalolipidomics in nutrition: significance in aging, neuroinflammation, macular degeneration, Alzheimer's, and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Nicolas G Bazan; Miguel F Molina; William C Gordon
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 4.  Mass spectrometry strategies for clinical metabolomics and lipidomics in psychiatry, neurology, and neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Paul L Wood
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Peroxisomes of the Brain: Distribution, Functions, and Associated Diseases.

Authors:  Rachayeeta Deb; Neha Joshi; Shirisha Nagotu
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 6.  Omega-3 fatty acids, lipids, and apoE lipidation in Alzheimer's disease: a rationale for multi-nutrient dementia prevention.

Authors:  Marcus O W Grimm; Daniel M Michaelson; Tobias Hartmann
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Efficient synthesis of the very-long-chain n-3 fatty acids, tetracosahexaenoic acid (C24:6n-3) and tricosahexaenoic acid (C23:6n-3).

Authors:  Toshimasa Itoh; Ayako Tomiyasu; Keiko Yamamoto
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 1.880

8.  Altered Expression of Small Intestinal Drug Transporters and Hepatic Metabolic Enzymes in a Mouse Model of Familial Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Yijun Pan; Kotaro Omori; Izna Ali; Masanori Tachikawa; Tetsuya Terasaki; Kim L R Brouwer; Joseph A Nicolazzo
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators Improve Neuronal Survival and Increase Aβ42 Phagocytosis.

Authors:  Mingqin Zhu; Xiuzhe Wang; Erik Hjorth; Romain A Colas; Lisa Schroeder; Ann-Charlotte Granholm; Charles N Serhan; Marianne Schultzberg
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.590

10.  Serum cholesterol and variant in cholesterol-related gene CETP predict white matter microstructure.

Authors:  Nicholus M Warstadt; Emily L Dennis; Neda Jahanshad; Omid Kohannim; Talia M Nir; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray; Grant W Montgomery; Anjali K Henders; Nicholas G Martin; John B Whitfield; Clifford R Jack; Matt A Bernstein; Michael W Weiner; Arthur W Toga; Margaret J Wright; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.