BACKGROUND: Numerous conceptual frameworks have been developed to understand how community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships function, and multiple measurement approaches have been designed to evaluate them. However, most measures are not validated, and have focused on new partnerships. To define and assess the meaning of success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, we are conducting a CBPR study, Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS). In this article we describe the theoretical underpinnings and methodological approaches used. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to 1) develop a questionnaire to evaluate success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, 2) test the psychometric qualities of the questionnaire, 3) assess the relationships between key variables and refine the questionnaire and theoretical model, and 4) develop mechanisms and a feedback tool to apply partnership evaluation findings. METHODS: Methodological approaches have included: engaged a community-academic national Expert Panel; conducted key informant interviews with Expert Panel; conducted a scoping literature review; conducted a Delphi process with the Expert Panel; and revised the measurement instrument. Additional methods include: conduct cognitive interviews and pilot testing; revise and test final version of the questionnaire with long-standing CBPR partnerships; examine the reliability and validity; analyze the relationship among variables in the framework; revise the framework; and develop a feedback mechanism for sharing partnership evaluation results. CONCLUSIONS: Through the application of a theoretical model and multiple methodological approaches, the MAPS study will result in a validated measurement instrument and will develop procedures for effectively feeding back evaluation findings in order to strengthen authentic partnerships to achieve health equity.
BACKGROUND: Numerous conceptual frameworks have been developed to understand how community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships function, and multiple measurement approaches have been designed to evaluate them. However, most measures are not validated, and have focused on new partnerships. To define and assess the meaning of success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, we are conducting a CBPR study, Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS). In this article we describe the theoretical underpinnings and methodological approaches used. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to 1) develop a questionnaire to evaluate success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, 2) test the psychometric qualities of the questionnaire, 3) assess the relationships between key variables and refine the questionnaire and theoretical model, and 4) develop mechanisms and a feedback tool to apply partnership evaluation findings. METHODS: Methodological approaches have included: engaged a community-academic national Expert Panel; conducted key informant interviews with Expert Panel; conducted a scoping literature review; conducted a Delphi process with the Expert Panel; and revised the measurement instrument. Additional methods include: conduct cognitive interviews and pilot testing; revise and test final version of the questionnaire with long-standing CBPR partnerships; examine the reliability and validity; analyze the relationship among variables in the framework; revise the framework; and develop a feedback mechanism for sharing partnership evaluation results. CONCLUSIONS: Through the application of a theoretical model and multiple methodological approaches, the MAPS study will result in a validated measurement instrument and will develop procedures for effectively feeding back evaluation findings in order to strengthen authentic partnerships to achieve health equity.
Authors: M Viswanathan; A Ammerman; E Eng; G Garlehner; K N Lohr; D Griffith; S Rhodes; C Samuel-Hodge; S Maty; L Lux; L Webb; S F Sutton; T Swinson; A Jackman; L Whitener Journal: Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) Date: 2004-08
Authors: Karen Hacker; Shalini A Tendulkar; Catlin Rideout; Nazmim Bhuiya; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Clara P Savage; Milagro Grullon; Hal Strelnick; Carolyn Leung; Ann DiGirolamo Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2012
Authors: Barbara L Brush; Graciela Mentz; Megan Jensen; Brianna Jacobs; Kate M Saylor; Zachary Rowe; Barbara A Israel; Laurie Lachance Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2019-10-16
Authors: Laurie Lachance; Chris M Coombe; Barbara L Brush; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee; Megan Jensen; Brianna Taffe; Prachi Bhardwaj; Michael Muhammad; Eliza Wilson-Powers; Zachary Rowe; Cleopatra H Caldwell; Barbara A Israel Journal: J Appl Behav Sci Date: 2020-11-12
Authors: Lindsay A Bornheimer; Juliann Li Verdugo; Joshua Holzworth; Vitalis Im; Fonda N Smith; Hannah Sliwa; Stephan F Taylor; Cheryl A King; Timothy Florence; Nicholas Tarrier; Joseph A Himle Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 11.225
Authors: Ashley M Weber; Kristin C Voos; Tamilyn M Bakas; Jared B Rice; Mary Ann Blatz; Ana Paula Duarte Ribeiro; Heather L Tubbs-Cooley; Matthew J Rota; Heather C Kaplan Journal: J Clin Nurs Date: 2021-07-04 Impact factor: 3.036
Authors: Blake Boursaw; John G Oetzel; Elizabeth Dickson; Thomas S Thein; Shannon Sanchez-Youngman; Juan Peña; Myra Parker; Maya Magarati; Lenora Littledeer; Bonnie Duran; Nina Wallerstein Journal: Am J Community Psychol Date: 2021-02-18