BACKGROUND: Physicians are encouraged to counsel overweight and obese patients to lose weight. PURPOSE: It was examined whether discussing weight and use of motivational interviewing techniques (e.g., collaborating, reflective listening) while discussing weight predicted weight loss 3 months after the encounter. METHODS: Forty primary care physicians and 461 of their overweight or obese patient visits were audio recorded between December 2006 and June 2008. Patient actual weight at the encounter and 3 months after the encounter (n=426); whether weight was discussed; physicians' use of motivational interviewing techniques; and patient, physician, and visit covariates (e.g., race, age, specialty) were assessed. This was an observational study and data were analyzed in April 2009. RESULTS: No differences in weight loss were found between patients whose physicians discussed weight or did not. Patients whose physicians used motivational interviewing-consistent techniques during weight-related discussions lost weight 3 months post-encounter; those whose physician used motivational interviewing-inconsistent techniques gained or maintained weight. The estimated difference in weight change between patients whose physician had a higher global motivational interviewing-Spirit score (e.g., collaborated with patient) and those whose physician had a lower score was 1.6 kg (95% CI=-2.9, -0.3, p=0.02). The same was true for patients whose physician used reflective statements: 0.9 kg (95% CI=-1.8, -0.1, p=0.03). Similarly, patients whose physicians expressed only motivational interviewing-consistent behaviors had a difference in weight change of 1.1 kg (95% CI=-2.3, 0.1, p=0.07) compared to those whose physician expressed only motivational interviewing-inconsistent behaviors (e.g., judging, confronting). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, use of motivational interviewing techniques during weight loss discussions predicted patient weight loss.
BACKGROUND: Physicians are encouraged to counsel overweight and obesepatients to lose weight. PURPOSE: It was examined whether discussing weight and use of motivational interviewing techniques (e.g., collaborating, reflective listening) while discussing weight predicted weight loss 3 months after the encounter. METHODS: Forty primary care physicians and 461 of their overweight or obesepatient visits were audio recorded between December 2006 and June 2008. Patient actual weight at the encounter and 3 months after the encounter (n=426); whether weight was discussed; physicians' use of motivational interviewing techniques; and patient, physician, and visit covariates (e.g., race, age, specialty) were assessed. This was an observational study and data were analyzed in April 2009. RESULTS: No differences in weight loss were found between patients whose physicians discussed weight or did not. Patients whose physicians used motivational interviewing-consistent techniques during weight-related discussions lost weight 3 months post-encounter; those whose physician used motivational interviewing-inconsistent techniques gained or maintained weight. The estimated difference in weight change between patients whose physician had a higher global motivational interviewing-Spirit score (e.g., collaborated with patient) and those whose physician had a lower score was 1.6 kg (95% CI=-2.9, -0.3, p=0.02). The same was true for patients whose physician used reflective statements: 0.9 kg (95% CI=-1.8, -0.1, p=0.03). Similarly, patients whose physicians expressed only motivational interviewing-consistent behaviors had a difference in weight change of 1.1 kg (95% CI=-2.3, 0.1, p=0.07) compared to those whose physician expressed only motivational interviewing-inconsistent behaviors (e.g., judging, confronting). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, use of motivational interviewing techniques during weight loss discussions predicted patientweight loss.
Authors: Michael L Dansinger; Joi Augustin Gleason; John L Griffith; Harry P Selker; Ernst J Schaefer Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-01-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gary D Foster; Thomas A Wadden; Angela P Makris; Duncan Davidson; Rebecca Swain Sanderson; David B Allison; Amy Kessler Journal: Obes Res Date: 2003-10
Authors: Kimberly Campbell-Voytal; Jeanette M Daly; Zsolt J Nagykaldi; Cheryl B Aspy; Rowena J Dolor; Lyle J Fagnan; Barcey T Levy; Hannah L Palac; LeAnn Michaels; V Beth Patterson; Miria Kano; Paul D Smith; Andrew L Sussman; Robert Williams; Pamela Sterling; Maeve O'Beirne; Anne Victoria Neale Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Elizabeth J Carey; Jennifer C Lai; Christopher Sonnenday; Elliot B Tapper; Puneeta Tandon; Andres Duarte-Rojo; Michael A Dunn; Cynthia Tsien; Eric R Kallwitz; Vicky Ng; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Matthew Kappus; Mustafa R Bashir; Aldo J Montano-Loza Journal: Hepatology Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Kathryn I Pollak; Cynthia J Coffman; Stewart C Alexander; James A Tulsky; Pauline Lyna; Rowena J Dolor; Mary E Cox; Rebecca J Namenek Brouwer; Michael E Bodner; Truls Østbye Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: April Idalski Carcone; Ellen Barton; Susan Eggly; Kathryn E Brogan Hartlieb; Luke Thominet; Sylvie Naar Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-02-15
Authors: Alexander Kotov; Mehedi Hasan; April Carcone; Ming Dong; Sylvie Naar-King; Kathryn BroganHartlieb Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2015-11-05