Literature DB >> 15632335

Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial.

Michael L Dansinger1, Joi Augustin Gleason, John L Griffith, Harry P Selker, Ernst J Schaefer.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The scarcity of data addressing the health effects of popular diets is an important public health concern, especially since patients and physicians are interested in using popular diets as individualized eating strategies for disease prevention.
OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence rates and the effectiveness of 4 popular diets (Atkins, Zone, Weight Watchers, and Ornish) for weight loss and cardiac risk factor reduction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-center randomized trial at an academic medical center in Boston, Mass, of overweight or obese (body mass index: mean, 35; range, 27-42) adults aged 22 to 72 years with known hypertension, dyslipidemia, or fasting hyperglycemia. Participants were enrolled starting July 18, 2000, and randomized to 4 popular diet groups until January 24, 2002. INTERVENTION: A total of 160 participants were randomly assigned to either Atkins (carbohydrate restriction, n=40), Zone (macronutrient balance, n=40), Weight Watchers (calorie restriction, n=40), or Ornish (fat restriction, n=40) diet groups. After 2 months of maximum effort, participants selected their own levels of dietary adherence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: One-year changes in baseline weight and cardiac risk factors, and self-selected dietary adherence rates per self-report.
RESULTS: Assuming no change from baseline for participants who discontinued the study, mean (SD) weight loss at 1 year was 2.1 (4.8) kg for Atkins (21 [53%] of 40 participants completed, P = .009), 3.2 (6.0) kg for Zone (26 [65%] of 40 completed, P = .002), 3.0 (4.9) kg for Weight Watchers (26 [65%] of 40 completed, P < .001), and 3.3 (7.3) kg for Ornish (20 [50%] of 40 completed, P = .007). Greater effects were observed in study completers. Each diet significantly reduced the low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio by approximately 10% (all P<.05), with no significant effects on blood pressure or glucose at 1 year. Amount of weight loss was associated with self-reported dietary adherence level (r = 0.60; P<.001) but not with diet type (r = 0.07; P = .40). For each diet, decreasing levels of total/HDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and insulin were significantly associated with weight loss (mean r = 0.36, 0.37, and 0.39, respectively) with no significant difference between diets (P = .48, P = .57, P = .31, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Each popular diet modestly reduced body weight and several cardiac risk factors at 1 year. Overall dietary adherence rates were low, although increased adherence was associated with greater weight loss and cardiac risk factor reductions for each diet group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15632335     DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  393 in total

Review 1.  Gut hormones: the future of obesity treatment?

Authors:  Anne K McGavigan; Kevin G Murphy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Comparative effects of low-carbohydrate high-protein versus low-fat diets on the kidney.

Authors:  Allon N Friedman; Lorraine G Ogden; Gary D Foster; Samuel Klein; Richard Stein; Bernard Miller; James O Hill; Carrie Brill; Brooke Bailer; Diane R Rosenbaum; Holly R Wyatt
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Long Term Effects of Energy-Restricted Diets Differing in Glycemic Load on Metabolic Adaptation and Body Composition.

Authors:  Sai Krupa Das; Cheryl H Gilhooly; Julie K Golden; Anastassios G Pittas; Paul J Fuss; Gerard E Dallal; Megan A McCrory; Edward Saltzman; Susan B Roberts
Journal:  Open Nutr J       Date:  2007-04-01

4.  High-intensity exercise and carbohydrate-reduced energy-restricted diet in obese individuals.

Authors:  Francesco Sartor; Helma M de Morree; Verena Matschke; Samuele M Marcora; Athanasios Milousis; Jeanette M Thom; Hans-Peter Kubis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Agricultural policies, food and public health.

Authors:  Barry M Popkin
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Effects of low-carbohydrate diets versus low-fat diets on metabolic risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Tian Hu; Katherine T Mills; Lu Yao; Kathryn Demanelis; Mohamed Eloustaz; William S Yancy; Tanika N Kelly; Jiang He; Lydia A Bazzano
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  Severe Obesity in the Pediatric Population: Current Concepts in Clinical Care.

Authors:  Claudia K Fox; Amy C Gross; Eric M Bomberg; Justin R Ryder; Megan M Oberle; Carolyn T Bramante; Aaron S Kelly
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2019-09

8.  Carbohydrate restriction, prostate cancer growth, and the insulin-like growth factor axis.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; John Mavropoulos; Amy Wang; Medha Darshan; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; William J Aronson; Pinchas Cohen; David Hwang; Bercedis Peterson; Timothy Fields; Salvatore V Pizzo; William B Isaacs
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  Taking the bitter with the sweet: relationship of supertasting and sweet preference with metabolic syndrome and dietary intake.

Authors:  Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate; Dominic Moore; Barry Popkin
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  A model of social influence on body mass index.

Authors:  Ross A Hammond; Joseph T Ornstein
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.