Elizabeth J Carey1, Jennifer C Lai2, Christopher Sonnenday3, Elliot B Tapper4, Puneeta Tandon5, Andres Duarte-Rojo6, Michael A Dunn6, Cynthia Tsien7, Eric R Kallwitz8, Vicky Ng9, Srinivasan Dasarathy10, Matthew Kappus11, Mustafa R Bashir12, Aldo J Montano-Loza5. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 3. Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 5. Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 6. Center for Liver Diseases, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, and Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 7. Gastroenterology Department, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 8. Loyola University, Chicago, IL. 9. Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 10. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 11. Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 12. Division of Abdominal Imaging, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Abstract
Loss of muscle mass and function, or sarcopenia, is a common feature of cirrhosis and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in this population. Sarcopenia is a main indicator of adverse outcomes in this population, including poor quality of life, hepatic decompensation, mortality in patients with cirrhosis evaluated for liver transplantation (LT), longer hospital and intensive care unit stay, higher incidence of infection following LT, and higher overall health care cost. Although it is clear that muscle mass is an important predictor of LT outcomes, many questions remain, including the best modality for assessing muscle mass, the optimal cut-off values for sarcopenia, the ideal timing and frequency of muscle mass assessment, and how to best incorporate the concept of sarcopenia into clinical decision making. For these reasons, we assembled a group of experts to form the North American Working Group on Sarcopenia in Liver Transplantation to use evidence from the medical literature to address these outstanding questions regarding sarcopenia in LT. We believe sarcopenia assessment should be considered in all patients with cirrhosis evaluated for liver transplantation. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) assessed by computed tomography constitutes the best-studied technique for assessing sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis. Cut-off values for sarcopenia, defined as SMI < 50 cm2 /m2 in male and < 39 cm2 /m2 in female patients, constitute the validated definition for sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis. Conclusion: The management of sarcopenia requires a multipronged approach including nutrition, exercise, and additional pharmacological therapy as deemed necessary. Future studies should evaluate whether recovery of sarcopenia with nutritional management in combination with an exercise program is sustainable as well as how improvement in muscle mass might be associated with improvement in clinical outcomes.
Loss of muscle mass and function, or sarcopenia, is a common feature of cirrhosis and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in this population. Sarcopenia is a main indicator of adverse outcomes in this population, including poor quality of life, hepatic decompensation, mortality in patients with cirrhosis evaluated for liver transplantation (LT), longer hospital and intensive care unit stay, higher incidence of infection following LT, and higher overall health care cost. Although it is clear that muscle mass is an important predictor of LT outcomes, many questions remain, including the best modality for assessing muscle mass, the optimal cut-off values for sarcopenia, the ideal timing and frequency of muscle mass assessment, and how to best incorporate the concept of sarcopenia into clinical decision making. For these reasons, we assembled a group of experts to form the North American Working Group on Sarcopenia in Liver Transplantation to use evidence from the medical literature to address these outstanding questions regarding sarcopenia in LT. We believe sarcopenia assessment should be considered in all patients with cirrhosis evaluated for liver transplantation. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) assessed by computed tomography constitutes the best-studied technique for assessing sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis. Cut-off values for sarcopenia, defined as SMI < 50 cm2 /m2 in male and < 39 cm2 /m2 in female patients, constitute the validated definition for sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis. Conclusion: The management of sarcopenia requires a multipronged approach including nutrition, exercise, and additional pharmacological therapy as deemed necessary. Future studies should evaluate whether recovery of sarcopenia with nutritional management in combination with an exercise program is sustainable as well as how improvement in muscle mass might be associated with improvement in clinical outcomes.
Authors: Rahima A Bhanji; Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez; Andres Duarte-Rojo; Maryam Ebadi; Sunita Ghosh; Christopher Rose; Aldo J Montano-Loza Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 6.047
Authors: M Yanishi; Y Kimura; H Tsukaguchi; Y Koito; H Taniguchi; T Mishima; Y Fukushima; M Sugi; H Kinoshita; T Matsuda Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Eva Román; Maria Teresa Torrades; Maria Josep Nadal; Guillem Cárdenas; Juan Camilo Nieto; Sílvia Vidal; Helena Bascuñana; Cándido Juárez; Carlos Guarner; Juan Córdoba; Germán Soriano Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Rebecca L Corey; Michael D Whitaker; Michael D Crowell; Mira T Keddis; Bashar Aqel; Vijayan Balan; Thomas Byrne; Elizabeth Carey; David D Douglas; M Edwyn Harrison; Hugo E Vargas; Jorge Rakela Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Calvin Kruger; Margaret L McNeely; Robert J Bailey; Milad Yavari; Juan G Abraldes; Michelle Carbonneau; Kim Newnham; Vanessa DenHeyer; Mang Ma; Richard Thompson; Ian Paterson; Mark J Haykowsky; Puneeta Tandon Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Puneeta Tandon; Gavin Low; Marina Mourtzakis; Laura Zenith; Robert P Myers; Juan G Abraldes; Abdel Aziz M Shaheen; Hina Qamar; Nadia Mansoor; Michelle Carbonneau; Kathleen Ismond; Sumeer Mann; Alshimaa Alaboudy; Mang Ma Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Sophie L Allen; Jonathan I Quinlan; Amritpal Dhaliwal; Matthew J Armstrong; Ahmed M Elsharkawy; Carolyn A Greig; Janet M Lord; Gareth G Lavery; Leigh Breen Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 4.052