Literature DB >> 20834043

Long-term effects on cortical excitability and motor recovery induced by repeated muscle vibration in chronic stroke patients.

Barbara Marconi1, Guido M Filippi, Giacomo Koch, Viola Giacobbe, Cristiano Pecchioli, Viviana Versace, Filippo Camerota, Vincenzo M Saraceni, Carlo Caltagirone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Muscle vibration modifies corticomotor excitability in healthy subjects and reduces muscle tonus in stroke patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether repeated muscle vibration (rMV) applied over the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and biceps brachii (BB) can induce long-lasting changes, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in patients with chronic stroke.
METHODS: Thirty hemiparetic patients who offered at least minimal wrist and elbow isometric voluntary contractions were randomly assigned to either an experimental group, which received rMV in addition to physiotherapy (rMV + PT), or a control group that underwent PT alone. The following parameters of the FCR, BB, and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) were measured through TMS before, and 1 hour, 1 week, and 2 weeks after the end of intervention: resting motor threshold (RMT), map area, map volume, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Muscle tonus and motor function were assessed on the same day as TMS.
RESULTS: Pre-post analysis revealed a reduction in RMT and an increase in motor map areas occurred in the vibrated muscles only in the rMV + PT group, with an increase in map volumes of all muscles. Moreover, SICI increased in the flexors and decreased in the extensor. These neurophysiological changes lasted for at least 2 weeks after the end of rMV + PT and paralleled the reduction in spasticity and increase in motor function. A significant correlation was found between the degree of spasticity and the amount of intracortical inhibition.
CONCLUSION: rMV with PT may be used as a nonpharmacological intervention in the neurorehabilitation of mild to moderate hemiparesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20834043     DOI: 10.1177/1545968310376757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  45 in total

1.  Muscle focal vibration in healthy subjects: evaluation of the effects on upper limb motor performance measured using a robotic device.

Authors:  Irene Aprile; Enrica Di Sipio; Marco Germanotta; Chiara Simbolotti; Luca Padua
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Mechanical flutter stimulation induces a lasting response in the sensorimotor cortex as revealed with BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Monica Christova; Stefan Golaszewski; Anja Ischebeck; Alexander Kunz; Dietmar Rafolt; Raffaele Nardone; Eugen Gallasch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Achilles tendon vibration-induced changes in plantar flexor corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Thomas Lapole; John Temesi; Philippe Gimenez; Pierrick J Arnal; Guillaume Y Millet; Michel Petitjean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Boosting and consolidating the proprioceptive cortical aftereffect by combining tendon vibration and repetitive TMS over primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Luisa Perasso; Laura Avanzino; Giovanna Lagravinese; Alessandro Giannini; Emanuela Luisa Faelli; Ambra Bisio; Angelo Quartarone; Vincenzo Rizzo; Piero Ruggeri; Marco Bove
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Decreased short-interval intracortical inhibition correlates with better pinch strength in patients with stroke and good motor recovery.

Authors:  Karina Nocelo Ferreiro de Andrade; Adriana Bastos Conforto
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  [Efficacy of early neurological and neurosurgical rehabilitation : Evidence-based treatment, outcome and prognostic factors].

Authors:  M Pohl; M Bertram
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Scaled Vibratory Feedback Can Bias Muscle Use in Children With Dystonia During a Redundant, 1-Dimensional Myocontrol Task.

Authors:  Shanie A Liyanagamage; Matteo Bertucco; Nasir H Bhanpuri; Terence D Sanger
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Reproducibility of transcranial magnetic stimulation metrics in the study of proximal upper limb muscles.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Sarah M Roelle; Corin E Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Nicole M Varnerin; David A Cunningham; Jennifer S Sharma; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang H Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.368

9.  Use of imperceptible wrist vibration to modulate sensorimotor cortical activity.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Brian D Schmit; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark S George; Leonardo Bonilha; Ryan J Downey; Will DeVries; Tibor Nagy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Acute and chronic neuromuscular adaptations to local vibration training.

Authors:  Robin Souron; Thibault Besson; Guillaume Y Millet; Thomas Lapole
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.