Literature DB >> 22611041

Mechanical flutter stimulation induces a lasting response in the sensorimotor cortex as revealed with BOLD fMRI.

Monica Christova1, Stefan Golaszewski, Anja Ischebeck, Alexander Kunz, Dietmar Rafolt, Raffaele Nardone, Eugen Gallasch.   

Abstract

It has been recently shown that 20 min of mechanical flutter stimulation induces lasting motor cortical excitability changes, as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation in relaxed hand muscles. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study aims to examine if such neuromodulatory changes are reflected in the BOLD signal during a motor test. Therefore, two groups were recruited: one group receiving whole-hand flutter stimulation with a frequency of 25 Hz (FSTIM group, n = 22) and a second group receiving no stimulation (NOSTIM group, n = 22). As motor test finger-to-thumb tapping was performed to activate a wide sensorimotor network during the fMRI measurements. Three fMRI measurements were obtained with this test: before stimulation (PRE), after stimulation (POST1), and 1 h after stimulation (POST2). Three regions of interest (ROIs) were defined: primary motor area (M1), primary somatosensory area (S1), and supplementary motor area. In the absence of baseline differences between both groups, the FSTIM group showed increased movement-related brain activations compared with the NOSTIM group, both at POST1 and POST2. ROI analysis revealed increased blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) responses within contralateral S1 (+20%) and M1 (+25%) at POST1, which lasted until POST2. These poststimulatory effects within S1 and M1 obviously reflect neuroplastic changes associated with augmented cortical excitability. These findings are of high clinical relevance, for example, to improve the treatment of stroke patients.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical plasticity; fMRI; finger tapping paradigm; neuromodulation; sensorimotor cortex; somatosensory stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611041      PMCID: PMC6870026          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  59 in total

1.  Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: physiological characteristics and tuning function.

Authors:  S Tobimatsu; Y M Zhang; M Kato
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; J Pauls; M Augath; T Trinath; A Oeltermann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses.

Authors:  A Z Snyder
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

4.  Vibration-induced effects in stroke patients with spastic hemiparesis--a pilot study.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Christian Binder
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Variability of BOLD response evoked by foot vibrotactile stimulation: influence of vibration amplitude and stimulus waveform.

Authors:  C M Siedentopf; K Heubach; A Ischebeck; E Gallasch; M Fend; F M Mottaghy; F Koppelstaetter; I A Haala; B J Krause; S Felber; F Gerstenbrand; S M Golaszewski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Outlasting corticomotor excitability changes induced by 25 Hz whole-hand mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Monica Christova; Dietmar Rafolt; Stefan Golaszewski; Eugen Gallasch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Periodic microstimulation of single mechanoreceptive afferents produces frequency-following responses in human EEG.

Authors:  E F Kelly; M Trulsson; S E Folger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex.

Authors:  E L Bienenstock; L N Cooper; P W Munro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cortical synaptogenesis and motor map reorganization occur during late, but not early, phase of motor skill learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kleim; Theresa M Hogg; Penny M VandenBerg; Natalie R Cooper; Rochelle Bruneau; Michael Remple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Increased motor cortical excitability after whole-hand electrical stimulation: a TMS study.

Authors:  Stefan M Golaszewski; Jürgen Bergmann; Monica Christova; Raffaele Nardone; Martin Kronbichler; Dietmar Rafolt; Eugen Gallasch; Wolfgang Staffen; Gunther Ladurner; Roland Beisteiner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  3 in total

1.  Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Pattern of Mechanical Tactile Stimulation.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Shota Miyaguchi; Shinichi Kotan; Ryoki Sasaki; Masaki Nakagawa; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Modulation of sensorimotor cortex by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Eugen Gallasch; Monica Christova; Alexander Kunz; Dietmar Rafolt; Stefan Golaszewski
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Detection of Simulated Tactile Gratings by Electro-Static Friction Show a Dependency on Bar Width for Blind and Sighted Observers, and Preliminary Neural Correlates in Sighted Observers.

Authors:  Quoc C Vuong; Aya M Shaaban; Carla Black; Jess Smith; Mahmoud Nassar; Ahmed Abozied; Patrick Degenaar; Walid Al-Atabany
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.