Literature DB >> 20833350

Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?

C M van der Aalst1, R J van Klaveren, H J de Koning.   

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the burden could be reduced by evidence-based strategies for the primary prevention of cancer, the early detection of malignancies and more adequate treatment of cancer patients. Previous research has shown that lifestyle factors are associated with common cancers and that several cancer screening programmes are cost-effective in reducing cancer-specific mortality. But, some recent studies reported that participants of screening programs might unintentionally change their lifestyle. Cancer screening might be a teachable moment or, on the other hand, have a false health certificate effect. Despite that the evidence is scarce, cancer screening might have opportunities for lifestyle improvements, although a possible health certificate effect still remains. Integrated approaches to combine primary and secondary prevention have the potential to optimise the efforts to improve cancer prevention and survival. More research is warranted to investigate evidence-based approaches.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20833350     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: A clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

Authors:  Lisa M Fucito; Sharon Czabafy; Peter S Hendricks; Chris Kotsen; Donna Richardson; Benjamin A Toll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Stages of change, determinants, and mortality for smoking cessation in adult Taiwanese screenees.

Authors:  Dih-Ling Luh; Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Long-Ren Liao; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Ting-Ting Wang; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Ching-Yuan Fann
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-02

3.  Preventive Health Behaviors Among Low-Income African American and Hispanic Populations: Can Colonoscopy Screening Serve as a Teachable Moment?

Authors:  Pathu Sriphanlop; Lina Jandorf; Hayley Thompson; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; William Redd; Rachel C Shelton
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-04-03

Review 4.  Surveillance for gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Ashish K Tiwari; Heather S Laird-Fick; Ramesh K Wali; Hemant K Roy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Screening for high hip fracture risk does not impact on falls risk: a post hoc analysis from the SCOOP study.

Authors:  C I Condurache; S Chiu; P Chotiyarnwong; H Johansson; L Shepstone; E Lenaghan; C Cooper; S Clarke; R F S Khioe; R Fordham; N Gittoes; I Harvey; N C Harvey; A Heawood; R Holland; A Howe; J A Kanis; T Marshall; T W O'Neill; T J Peters; N M Redmond; D Torgerson; D Turner; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Rafael Meza; Sylvia K Plevritis; Kevin ten Haaf; Vidit N Munshi; Jihyoun Jeon; Saadet Ayca Erdogan; Chung Yin Kong; Summer S Han; Joost van Rosmalen; Sung Eun Choi; Paul F Pinsky; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Martin C Tammemägi; William D Hazelton; Eric J Feuer; Pamela M McMahon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Population based cancer screening programmes as a teachable moment for primary prevention interventions. A review of the literature.

Authors:  Carlo Senore; Livia Giordano; Cristina Bellisario; Francesca Di Stefano; Nereo Segnan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Design and respondent selection of a population-based study on associations between breast cancer screening, lifestyle and quality of life.

Authors:  Tytti Sarkeala; Sirpa Heinävaara; Jonna Fredman; Satu Männistö; Riitta Luoto; Maija Jäntti; Nea Malila
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Do health behaviours change after colonoscopy? A prospective cohort study on diet, alcohol, physical activity and smoking among patients and their partners.

Authors:  Gill Hubbard; Alistair Brown; Anna Campbell; Neil Campbell; Bob Diament; Shona Fielding; Liz Forbat; Lindsey F Masson; Ronan O'Carroll; Kevin Stein; David S Morrison
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Lifestyle changes associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening: Prospective data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Authors:  Claire Stevens; Samuel G Smith; Charlotte Vrinten; Jo Waller; Rebecca J Beeken
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.