Literature DB >> 22969223

Surveillance for gastrointestinal malignancies.

Ashish K Tiwari1, Heather S Laird-Fick, Ramesh K Wali, Hemant K Roy.   

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are notorious for frequently progressing to advanced stages even in the absence of serious symptoms, thus leading to delayed diagnoses and dismal prognoses. Secondary prevention of GI malignancies through early detection and treatment of cancer-precursor/premalignant lesions, therefore, is recognized as an effective cancer prevention strategy. In order to efficiently detect these lesions, systemic application of screening tests (surveillance) is needed. However, most of the currently used non-invasive screening tests for GI malignancies (for example, serum markers such as alpha-fetoprotein for hepatocellular carcinoma, and fecal occult blood test, for colon cancer) are only modestly effective necessitating the use of highly invasive endoscopy-based procedures, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy for screening purposes. Even for hepatocellular carcinoma where non-invasive imaging (ultrasonography) has become a standard screening tool, the need for repeated liver biopsies of suspicious liver nodules for histopathological confirmation can't be avoided. The invasive nature and high-cost associated with these screening tools hinders implementation of GI cancer screening programs. Moreover, only a small fraction of general population is truly predisposed to developing GI malignancies, and indeed needs surveillance. To spare the average-risk individuals from superfluous invasive procedures and achieve an economically viable model of cancer prevention, it's important to identify cohorts in general population that are at substantially high risk of developing GI malignancies (risk-stratification), and select suitable screening tests for surveillance in these cohorts. We herein provide a brief overview of such high-risk cohorts for different GI malignancies, and the screening strategies that have commonly been employed for surveillance purpose in them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Cancer prevention; Gastrointestinal malignancies; Screening; Surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22969223      PMCID: PMC3435775          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  100 in total

1.  Detection of intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus: an observational comparator study suggests the need for a minimum of eight biopsies.

Authors:  Rebecca Harrison; Ian Perry; William Haddadin; Stuart McDonald; Richard Bryan; Keith Abrams; Richard Sampliner; Nicholas J Talley; Paul Moayyedi; Janusz A Jankowski
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Surveillance for colitis-associated colon neoplasia.

Authors:  Hugh James Freeman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia.

Authors:  Amitabh Chak; Ashley Faulx; Charis Eng; William Grady; Margaret Kinnard; Heather Ochs-Balcom; Gary Falk
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Eaden; K R Abrams; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Strong interaction between the effects of alcohol consumption and smoking on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma among individuals with ADH1B and/or ALDH2 risk alleles.

Authors:  Fumiaki Tanaka; Ken Yamamoto; Sadao Suzuki; Hiroshi Inoue; Masahiko Tsurumaru; Yoshiaki Kajiyama; Hoichi Kato; Hiroyasu Igaki; Koh Furuta; Hiromasa Fujita; Toshiaki Tanaka; Yoichi Tanaka; Yoshiyuki Kawashima; Shoji Natsugoe; Tetsuro Setoyama; Shinkan Tokudome; Koshi Mimori; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Hideshi Ishii; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Why does Japan have a high incidence of gastric cancer? Comparison of gastritis between UK and Japanese patients.

Authors:  G M Naylor; T Gotoda; M Dixon; T Shimoda; L Gatta; R Owen; D Tompkins; A Axon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia revisited and updated.

Authors:  B Sipos; S Frank; T Gress; S Hahn; G Klöppel
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  Clinical outcomes after transfusion-associated hepatitis C.

Authors:  M J Tong; N S el-Farra; A R Reikes; R L Co
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study.

Authors:  Sudarshan R Kadri; Pierre Lao-Sirieix; Maria O'Donovan; Irene Debiram; Madhumita Das; Jane M Blazeby; Jon Emery; Alex Boussioutas; Helen Morris; Fiona M Walter; Paul Pharoah; Richard H Hardwick; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with recombinant mutant human TNF-α and raltitrexed in mice with colorectal-peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Qianyi Gong; Changfeng Song; Xiaotong Wang; Renjie Wang; Guoxiang Cai; Xin Liang; Jianwen Liu
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-02-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.