Literature DB >> 15609792

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Catherine Lejeune1, Patrick Arveux, Vincent Dancourt, Sophie Béjean, Claire Bonithon-Kopp, Jean Faivre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials have demonstrated that fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer can significantly reduce mortality. However, to be deemed a priority from a public health policy perspective, any new program must prove itself to be cost-effective. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer using a fecal occult blood screening test, the Hemoccult-II, in a cohort of 100,000 asymptomatic individuals 50-74 years of age.
METHODS: A decision analysis model using a Markov approach simulates the trajectory of the cohort allocated either to screening or no screening over a 20-year period through several health states. Clinical and economic data used in the model came from the Burgundy trial, French population-based studies, and Registry data.
RESULTS: Modeling biennial screening versus the absence of screening over a 20-year period resulted in a 17.7 percent mortality reduction and a discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 3357 Euro per life-year gained among individuals 50-74 years of age. Sensitivity analyses performed on epidemiological and economic data showed the strong impact on the results of colonoscopy cost, of compliance to screening, and of specificity of the screening test.
CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effectiveness estimates and sensitivity analyses suggest that biennial screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test could be recommended from the age of 50 until 74. Our findings support the attempts to introduce large-scale population screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15609792     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462304001321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  12 in total

1.  The dynamics of colorectal cancer management in 17 countries.

Authors:  Panos Kanavos; Willemien Schurer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-01

Review 2.  CT colonography and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; James E East; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  [Diagnostic imaging of inflammatory and tumorous diseases of the colon].

Authors:  O Schaefer; T Baumann; M Treier; M Langer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.043

6.  Colon cancer screening update and management of the malignant polyp.

Authors:  James M Church
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

7.  Comparative benefit and cost-effectiveness of mailed-out faecal immunochemical tests vs collection at the general practitioner.

Authors:  Elisabeth F P Peterse; Caroline B Osoro; Marc Bardou; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Routine HIV screening in France: clinical impact and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Caroline E Sloan; Cécile Charlois-Ou; Stéphane Le Vu; Caroline Semaille; Dominique Costagliola; Josiane Pillonel; Anne-Isabelle Poullié; Olivier Scemama; Sylvie Deuffic-Burban; Elena Losina; Rochelle P Walensky; Kenneth A Freedberg; A David Paltiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations.

Authors:  Maartje Nielsen; Frederik J Hes; Hans F A Vasen; Wilbert B van den Hout
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.